Really? I’m not a Bradley fan and don’t think Bradley got a “gift”, at least not anymore so than Pac got a gift over JMM three times. When I first heard about the fight I too was outraged (I hate Arum!), but after viewing I watched it twice) I couldn’t understand the outrage/critics. A week or so after the fight I caught a video on boxing.com (it’s dated 27 June) and THAT was the fight I saw. A fight that was razor close, and one that I had Bradley winning by a couple rounds.Posted September 1, 2012 6:58 pm
Pedquiao and Arum will choose the poor old Mexican becaused they are EASY TO CHEAT ON= wether is by OVER THE LIMIT WEIGHT, PEDS or CROOKED PAID Judges.Posted September 1, 2012 6:57 pm
“the public” That really shows how blind and an ABSOLUTE IMBECILE you really are!!! PATHETIC!!!Posted September 1, 2012 4:39 pm
“the public” Your rationale is as good as an ABSOLUTE IMBECILE!!!Posted September 1, 2012 4:37 pm
Thank God Cotto doesn’t need to acquiesce to STUPID catchweight demands from overrated Ster0id users like Manny PacquinR0IDS. Good riddance. You fight by the rules or go kick rocks somewhere else. Cotto makes money WITHOUT PacquinR0IDS. FK him and his PEDS.Posted September 1, 2012 1:26 pm
Gotta love STUPID PacquinROID fans. Tell Manny PacquinROIDS to stop loading up on the horse ster0ids and stop hiding behind catchweights. Fight AT THE WEIGHTS designed for by boxing over the last few decades. Fight Cotto @ 154 and stop complaining. Amazing how fighters can’t fight at a designed weight. Cotto had to fight at practically a super lightweight, yet they were fighting for the welterweight title the last time these two met. Gotta love JUICERS whose careers are created by falsehoods. #OSTPosted September 1, 2012 1:24 pm
by these comments and your rationale, I take you are Filipino.Posted September 1, 2012 10:30 am
naw. Most people are now over the initial hype and realize Pac did nothing the last 4 rounds. That aint a champ and the right man won. Get over it and rematch this guy or retire. For shame Manny.Posted September 1, 2012 10:28 am
Cotto-Trout is a really good match-up I just hope it’s shown in the uk.Posted September 1, 2012 10:07 am
Hardley suprising that a Bradley fan thinks he won – trouble is everyone who isn’t a Bradley fan thinks he plain and simple got a gift. I’ve watched the fight a few times now and although it wasn’t a robbery on Brandon Rios-Richard Abril proportions it was a clear Pacquiao win. I’m not against Bradley winning I just want a fair and above board decision hopefully we’ll get that whenever the rematch happens.Posted September 1, 2012 9:59 am
He and FM need to fight. I’m sick of this s.Posted September 1, 2012 9:52 am
edit “who doesn’t require a catch weight.”Posted September 1, 2012 9:51 am
This writer Marcus Richardson needs a psychiatrist ASAP, saying Pacquiao will be defeated again by Bradley! In the first place Bradley was given a gift decision!The fight was not even close!Posted September 1, 2012 5:44 am
Cotto is fighting Mike Trout? Who cares who Cotto chose to fight I dont want to see Manny kick Cottos ass again, Cotto sucks and so does Bradley. Marquez is the only one who has beat Manny in the last 5 years.Posted September 1, 2012 3:19 am
THE REAL STORY here is that Miguel Cotto has chosen to take on Austin Trout, which will be Trout’s first major contest at elite level.
I’m a little surprised but also intrigued as Trout has begged for such a chance for the last year or so.
Being the bout is at MSG and Cotto’s support there, it will be a sell-out and give Miguel a chance to look really spectacular against a strong, young, up and comer.
The more I look at this fight the more intrigued I am…. If they can make a good undercard, perhaps with a Zab Judah etc on it, then this could well be worth a watch….
Good to see Cotto taking care of his own business now he is a free agent!!!!Posted September 1, 2012 3:11 am
There was also a little controversy about Bradley injuring his foot or whatever it was. To be fair, it was injured because he was tight and Pacquiao was putting pressure on him. Would he have done better if it was not injured. Maybe. Who knows. Do I care enough to find out? Probably not. Let him fight Marquez so we can see him get beat by the man once again.Posted September 1, 2012 3:10 am
I’m sorry it’s Markus my bad!Posted September 1, 2012 2:49 am
The author didn’t watch the Bradley Pac fight the only thing he looked at was the decision. Obviously cause nobody thought Bradley won not even Bradley lol.Posted September 1, 2012 2:45 am
Not interested in Pacquiao Bradley. Pacquiao already beat him the first time. The only controversy was in the scoring. The fight was pretty one-sided. I’d rather see Pac fight Marquez.Posted September 1, 2012 2:39 am
I don’t think there’s a need for Manny to fight again this year if there’s no better alternatives. Better yet let everything unfold now and sort it out next year. Sources say that Manny’s contract with Arum is about to expire some time next year. I think its Arum that is pushing the dates because of the contract with Manny.Posted September 1, 2012 2:30 am
Bradley beat pacman again? Ummmm….ok. I’m pretty sure that about 90% of people know pacman beat Bradley from corner to corner for a good 9 rounds of that fight. Bradley is the least risky option, but also the least financially too.Posted September 1, 2012 1:51 am
Yeah I don’t think Bradley will beat Pac again, I think they where just making up for the lose Pac should of had against Marquez in the 3rd fight. Pacs opponents are going to be running out just like his money. Pac is not in a good situation at the momentPosted September 1, 2012 1:48 am
money and greed is now the top priority of arum and pacquiao.Posted September 1, 2012 1:34 am
Why can’t Paquiao just take a rest, make the fight with Floyd whenever they csn make that happen and ride off into the sunset?Posted September 1, 2012 1:24 am
Author— you don’t like paqiao very much do you ? Bradley willl beat paqiao “again” …lol that says it all …Posted September 1, 2012 1:18 am