Bradley is out in the cold because he is a joke. He knows Pacquiao beat him badley, and his mouth did him in. He is damaged goods, and the only way he can come back is to fight Pacquiao again.
Marquez has been beaten by Pacquiao 3 times. Why again. If you watch Pacquiao vs Marquez II, at the start of round 12, Jim Lamply said that the only way Marquez can possibly win the fight was to knock out Pacquiao. It wasn’t close at all. Pac vs Marquez III was close, but Pavc won that fight 2.
Pacquiao beat the living chit out of Cotto.mWhy would Cotto agree to another serious beating?.Posted August 27, 2012 6:15 pm
Yes, Pac’s supposedly been a benefactor of some decisions however, they were NOT controversial on the level of the Pac/Bradley fight. The trilogy with jmm at best was contested between fans and writers from both sides but, when you compare the decision in Pacs last fight, everyone and their mother knows full well Pac won that fight hands down. You can’t argue with the majority of fans who argued against that decision however, when you compare it to pac/jmm….that decision was a toss up….nothing controversial about it, it could have gone either way. Pac/Bradley?….That’s a decision already known by anyone who is anyone at any reputable boxing site or magazine.Posted August 27, 2012 11:05 am
If he’s so good, why hasn’t anyone else challenged helmet head since he was last gifted? Google the decision to find that the majority of the planet knows Pac won. No rematch is necessary. It would be cool to see bradley humble himself and agree with what Andre Ward has already expressed that he lost and will give the belt back to Pac for a rematch. He needs to shed the arrogant attitude if he expects to play with the players. Know what I mean?Posted August 27, 2012 10:59 am
Sound on or off, Bradley still lost big time. When you’re in a room with friends watching a fight of this caliber, no one is listening to what these guys are saying besides, the action in the ring is what convinces people, nevermind what Lampley and co. are saying. I mean, you do have your own mind, don’t you?Posted August 27, 2012 10:54 am
In fact, if Tim had at least the class to admit that he was not satisfied with the result, it would have gone a long way towards establishing his credibility and integrity and winning over many more fans, who by the way…… keep Bradley and his family living large. The fact he acted in an arrogant manner after the fact speaks volumes about his character, and while he can act anyway he chooses to act, the fact remains that it is boxing fans who pay the bills. If we don’t like it……we certainly will not buy it. Bradely’s own facial reaction before the decision was rendered said it all and was in tandem with what most already knew, which was, he lost the fight.Posted August 27, 2012 10:48 am
Rematch not needed to prove anything. Majority of the planet knows Pac won, just ask Andre Ward who’s among the millions who agree.Posted August 27, 2012 10:33 am
Definitely more entertaining than a bradley rematch, although, I’d like to see them fight at 147.Posted August 27, 2012 10:31 am
You need to google what the rest of the world thought about that decision then think about it again. It’s not worth it on may fronts. First, the majority of the planet knows Pac won. Two, a rematch then would prove nothing given Pac already won. Three, the low ppv numbers prove Pac did Bradley a favor by giving him his most lucrative payday in his life, something by the way Bradley will never see again. Knowing full well the fight wouldn’t sell but still took it and was robbed in the process. So, what is there to be gained for Pac by fighting Bradley considering everything? Absolutely NOTHING!!!Posted August 27, 2012 10:26 am
COTTO EVEN AT 154 WILL AVOID A PACMAN FIGHT. HE SHOULD HAVE LEARNED A LESSON ON THE FIRST AND FROM MARGARITO AT 162 HAD PACMAN DISLOCATED HIS ORBITAL SOCKET.
COTTO FIGHTING PACMAN AGAIN AT ANY WEIGHT WILL BE DANGEROUS FOR HIM.
WHAT HAPPENED TO COTTO AND MARGARITO AGAINST PAC MAY HAPPENED TO MAYWEATHER, OR EVEN WORSE,Posted August 26, 2012 11:47 pm
I GO FOR A PACQUIAO-MARQUEZ FIGHT.
TRULY A BOXING MATCH IF THESE TWO FACES EACH OTHER AGAIN.
IT WILL REMIND ME OF DURAN-HAGLER, HEARNS-LEONARD, LEONARD- HAGLER AND HEARNS-HAGLER.
FLOYD’S GOOD BOXER BUT NOT EXPLOSIVE. HE’S BORING.
HE SHOULD CHANGE HIS SPORT FROM BOXING TO BADMINTON.
sorry -see another rematchPosted August 26, 2012 9:04 pm
I don’t want to any rematches! Pac needs to make fight with Mayweather or call it a day.Posted August 26, 2012 9:04 pm
He should fight Bradley again to regain the belt he lost. (Go to boxing.com’s June 27 article about their first fight if you think Pac won that fight.)Posted August 26, 2012 5:47 pm
Give Marquez another chance. He is Mexican and it was the great boxers of Mexico that made Pacquiao famous. Mexicans and Filipinos are like distant relatives, therefore, who ever wins will be more acceptable to both Flips and the Mexs.Posted August 26, 2012 2:48 pm
Obviously this “forreal” is an absolute IMBECILE!!! Even the current Major League Baseball and Boxing Commission testing able to catch who’s taking PED’s. This constant accusation coming from a FLOYDIOTS only shows what a PUPPETS they are for they don’t have a brain of their own and simply follow what Floydie told them so!!! PATHETIC!!! LMAO!!!Posted August 26, 2012 2:18 pm
Obviously your sick calling yourself Te tumbaPosted August 26, 2012 1:26 pm
I need somebody to tell me what I am seeing?Posted August 26, 2012 11:26 am
Ray Ray…..very cold….and it seems true. Pacquaio was missing a lot in his Bradley match upPosted August 26, 2012 9:14 am
JoeKidd….I never saw Pacquaio miss so much…..watch it with the sound off……the announcers were calling a fight that just wasn’t happening. Lampley scored blows that never landed…and called lefts and rights that missed as scoring blows….it was disgusting.Posted August 26, 2012 9:13 am
te tumbo….far more fight fans would like to see the Bradley /Pacquaio rematch …due to the win Bradley was awarded and the Title he now holds. Marquez has three fights already….exciting each one…some say Marquez should have been awarded at least one or even two of those fights…..but Marquez has three purses in the bank so far
NOBODY wants to see another Cotto , catchweight fight with Pacquaio..’cept goodol kind, caring and compassionate bobarum
Lastly…can we leave the insults aside….you living proof that anal sex is dangerousPosted August 26, 2012 9:09 am
“Tachyeon” Nope you’re WRONG!!! It’s your FLOYDIE who is out in the cold JAILED!!!Posted August 26, 2012 3:29 am
“Ray Ray” Then go tell FLOYDIE not to make any excuses so the fight will happen, okay?Posted August 26, 2012 3:28 am
“TARK” What the heck you’re talking about??? No rematch needed since the fight was corrupted! Even the WBO re-affirms who’s the real winner, right???Posted August 26, 2012 3:23 am
Truly, the only reason why this fight won’t happen because Floyd will always find excuses not to let it happen…and the Floydiots will always agree with him for they are like PUPPETS!!! PATHETIC!!!Posted August 26, 2012 3:21 am
“Charles” No doubt ‘coz these comments comes from the mouth of FLOYDIOTS AND CRYBABIES JUANITA and JUST LIKE YOU!!! PATHETIC!!! LMAO!!!Posted August 26, 2012 3:16 am
“B Red” You’re just simply dreaming!!! Simply you are as blind as you can be and a hater…Posted August 26, 2012 3:13 am
with Pacman fighting either Cotto or Marquez why doesnt Bradley for the other. Will be a cracka of a fight, no matter who it is.Posted August 26, 2012 3:01 am
I dont blame Arum if pac ducks the fight because Bradley will beat pac more convincing in the rematchPosted August 26, 2012 1:40 am
Of all the people that have earned the fight Marquez is it. He should own one if not two wins over Pac, and even as more of a fan of Pacman I`d kind of like to see JMM get a deserved nod over him. He is just an absolutely superb technician and a joy to watch work. Bradley I`m not that bothered about, and by the looks of the PPV, not many others are either. He didn`t earn the Pac fight in the first place – he got it by NOT fighting his obvious opponent, he got very fortunate with the scoring vs Pac, and now he is trash-talking to cover up his embarassment at getting the decision. If JMM had to fight Bradley for the right to go in with Pac I`d be picking Marquez all day long.Posted August 26, 2012 12:46 am
AA?????? Ya you need to see him for Free,,I would pay Dog Crap to see AA brawl, not fight, not box he can’t do neither!!!Posted August 25, 2012 11:06 pm
The comments so far have been decent here. You didn’t get any pacturds acting without class and spewing hate like usual. Good job guys!Posted August 25, 2012 10:42 pm
Keeps fighting flat-footed? Writer is a bona fide twit. Pacquiao looked fantastic against Bradley. Impeccable defence.Posted August 25, 2012 9:40 pm
Hype job Cotto will only tight at 154 and JMM only inmexico and does not really care about PAC. It’s PAC whoisoutin the coldPosted August 25, 2012 9:28 pm
Pacs on borrowed time if he fights Marquez he will lose if he fights Cotto at super welter he will lose if he fights Floyd at any weight he will lose, he’s got 1 or 2 fights left. Itl b interesting 2 c how Arum strings his career outPosted August 25, 2012 8:40 pm
A Cotto rematch is pointless Manny mopped the floor with him.Posted August 25, 2012 8:08 pm
If Pacquaio fights Marquez, and I hope that he does, it will be Pac’s last fight as Marquez will finish him this time and Arum will need to find a new golden goose.Posted August 25, 2012 7:32 pm
No rush for a Bradley-Pac rematch, but in lieu of that fight I wonder how much people will really be up for rematches with Cotto, who Pacquiao soundly thrashed the first time around, or Marquez, who neutralizes Pacman like cryptonite. Too bad Mayweather lets his bad breakup with his ex-girlfriend Arum get in the way of the obvious mega-fight everyone wants to see.Posted August 25, 2012 7:14 pm
You are correct, Bradley should be it. But for free.Posted August 25, 2012 6:15 pm
So not only does the new ESB format suck but they’ve added tracking software that follows where the hell we go? I’ve got a filter that blocks that app and alerts me to attempts to do it, so you won’t track me. Way to sell out your readers. I am out.Posted August 25, 2012 5:49 pm
Cotto or Marquez I don’t give a damn. Pac vs Floyd or no more PPV buys for either guy. Boycott in effect and I am no longer falling for an undercard bout I like.Posted August 25, 2012 5:41 pm
Pls where can i watch Abrahams fight free online?Posted August 25, 2012 5:01 pm
If Pacquiao doesn’t fight Bradley things are really screwed up in the fight game… The decision is not going to be overturned and Bradley doesn’t judge his own fights. A rematch should be mandatory. Hasn’t Pacquiao been the benefactor of dubious decisions during his career? And how many times does Pac have to fight Marquez? …. Cotto was dominated and stopped, so I don’t see a any particular reason for a rematch there.Posted August 25, 2012 4:44 pm
Hey anyone have a good english commentary link for Robert Stieglitz – Arthur Abraham fight?Posted August 25, 2012 4:39 pm
To be honest Bradley doidnt deserve the first shot at Pac and he didnt show much in their fight to warrant a rematch no matter what the scorecards said. Marquez 4 is a good choice and Marquez finally prevails!Posted August 25, 2012 4:22 pm
The best choice for pacquiao is Marquez. Their last fight did the best PPV numbers in his last few fights. It makes the most sense not only monetarily but also as an entertaining fight. Though I would love to see pacquiao step up 154lbs. And see what kind of animal he really is without all the catch weight bs.Posted August 25, 2012 4:07 pm