Boxing


Boxing News
Boxing Headlines
Boxing Results
Interviews
Boxing History
Boxing Schedule

Boxing Odds
Boxing News Wire
Boxing Rankings
Boxing Video
Live Boxing
Write For Us

Boxing Forum
Boxing Chat
The Team
Link to ESB
Boxing Links





 
Web ESB


Bet On Boxing

Talkin Boxing
With Billy C


Boxing News 24










 

HOW TO CLEAN UP PROFESSIONAL BOXING

By CLIFF CLARK

29.12 - Aren´t you sick of the whole damned alphabet soup business? It mucks up professional boxing terribly. I´m sick of fighters not fighting appropriate opponents, and mediocre fighters being proclaimed world champion. I would give anything if someone could engineer a solution. I´m sick of Holyfield-Ruiz and Tyson-Neilson style fights. I want to see Oquendo fight Lewis, Mosley fight De La Hoya, Jones fight Michalczewski etc.

Larry Holmes and Muhammad Ali fought when they were both past 30 years of age, and in Holmes´ eighth title defense. That horrible one-sided fight should have taken place several years earlier, when it would have been a good fight. Ali, like many other champions in boxing, got away with defending the title against unranked fighters. Instead of fighting Holmes, Ali hand-picked challengers like Richard Dunn, Jean Pierre Coopman and Leon Spinks. I point this out as a glaring example of Professional Boxing´s biggest problem: Multiple champions and organizations. The sad fact is that the multiple organizations that recognize the multiple champions will generally rank any fighter their champion wants to fight for a hefty sanctioning fee.

Professional boxing needs to have one internationally recognized champion ruling each division. It needs a system to force the champions to fight their number one ranked challengers, and it needs a system to force the top contenders to fight each other, instead of opponents they can easily brutalize. Professional tennis and golf organized into monolithic organizations that have the clout to discourage alphabet soup. That´s what has to happen in professional boxing on a worldwide basis. Professional boxing needs a few strong individuals with good business acumen and organizational skills, who can organize a network of professional boxing's power players. The network can work to slowly consolidate all the titles and organizations. What is needed is one powerful, global, controlling body that recognizes one champion in each weight class, and that makes great fights happen. That´s a dream that could come true.

I suggest a system that mandates each divisional champion fight the number one ranked challenger every three months. Each challenger ranked 2 through 9 would fight a designated opponent every three months also. Number 2 would fight number 3. Number 4 would fight number 5. Number 6 would fight number 7, and number 8 would fight number 9.

This system would inject tremendous excitement, activity and new blood into the game. As ranked fighters are beaten and drop out of contention, they would be replaced with young and hungry athletes, confident they´ll get their chance if they keep winning. Instead of waiting around years for a fight, good boxers would stay busy, honest promoters would get rich, and fans would see many more great fights.

Based on the results of the fights, the list of contenders should be revised every three months by a ratings board of genuine experts. The board should be comprised only of former top professional boxing trainers, and former top professional boxers, who are neurologically and mentally fit. There are many of them to choose from. What is needed are a few wealthy and successful former boxers of great integrity, who are still rabid fans. Guys who still follow boxers in every weight class. I wouldn't be opposed to including a couple of boxing´s better authors and journalists on the panel, but this shouldn´t be overdone. Figure skating, springboard/platform diving, and gymnastics are individual sports that generally have only top former athletes and coaches judging their top events. The decisions of those judges ultimately determine the ranking of the athletes in those sports. Boxing needs to upgrade it´s judging and ranking specialists.

Some people may feel that to mandate that champions and contenders fight every three months, would be a little rough on people who manage, promote and telecast fights. The fact is that some fighters nowadays think 2 fights a year is being active. Of course when you have millions of dollars in the bank, you may think 2 fights are plenty, but the people hurt the most by this inactivity are the four, six, and eight round prelim fighters. Some heavyweight fighters can afford to go a year between fights. They can fight a badly overmatched opponent, and make 100s of thousands or even millions of dollars. When main event fighters don´t fight, the prelim fighters don´t get a chance to earn their little pocket change. The boxing game languishes when main event fighters loaf around and sit on their bank account.

The problem of top fighters not fighting is not a new one. Jess Willard took it pretty easy after he won the heavyweight championship. Jack Dempsey let the heavyweight championship rust for a three-year stretch before he fought Gene Tunney.

On the opposite extreme, some top pros of that time, like Ted "Kid" Lewis, fought over 300 professional fights. Lewis fought from 1909 through 1929. After fighting 97 fights in the previous two years, Ted Lewis said he wanted to "pace myself" in 1913. He fought only 12 fights that year, including 11 fights scheduled for 15 to 20 rounds. In 1914 Ted Lewis fought 3 bruising 20 round battles in less than a month. He quickly fought two more grueling 20 round fights for a total of five 20 rounders in 64 days. He wrote that he was in the top physical condition of his life during that period, because he knew he had to face tougher fighters than he had ever fought before in 20 round fights. He had 145 fights under his belt through 1914, and he didn´t fight Jack Britton until 1915. Britton became his best opponent, and they fought 20 times. In those days the gloves were much smaller and the hands were wrapped and taped a little harder. It is true that the science of the sport has advanced a lot, and you have better pure boxers in the ring today than ever before; but the fighters of Ted Lewis´ day were generally tougher, harder, better conditioned, and more durable than most boxers of today.

I´m not an old timer, and I´m not one to say today´s fighters are soft. My only reason for telling the Ted Lewis story is because you hear some folks say that fighters need months of time to recuperate from a fight. Obviously if a fighter takes a beating, or gets knocked out in brutal fashion, he needs a long rest. In certain cases boxers should have their boxing licenses revoked. If a fighter is caught napping and suffers a one punch knock out--such as happened to Lennox Lewis against Rahman--he should be ready to fight again in 90 days, as long as he checks out neurologically. A good alert boxer with finished boxing skills should not get hit with many damaging punches. He should be able to fight competitive fights frequently. Certainly one fight every three months is not excessive.

Of course the tough part to reforming professional boxing will be to consolidate all the titles and alphabet organizations. That will take some ingenuity and cooperation among top promoters, managers, publishers, and others who have a lot to gain by cleaning up professional boxing. Professional boxing needs to combine the strength of it´s most influential entities to create one dominant worldwide organization that can repel unsavory influences, create a superior and well structured regulatory environment, and build the international respect it´s community and fans have always dreamed of.

I´ll reiterate that tennis and golf are individual sports, of international scope, that have successfully resisted the attempts by interlopers to split up, and mess up the their ranks. They do it through the determined cooperation of resourceful and honest professionals.

 

Like This Story Then Digg It:






 





Boxing Forum








Mixed Martial Arts News





If you detect any issues with the legality of this site, problems are always unintentional and will be corrected with notification.
The views and opinions of all writers expressed on eastsideboxing.com do not necessarily state or reflect those of the Management.
Copyright © 2001- 2008 East Side Boxing.com - Privacy Policy l Contact