PDA

View Full Version : Was Morales robbed?

ko factor
08-05-2007, 12:43 AM
What do you think?
Zakman
08-05-2007, 12:46 AM
Nope. People say every close fight was a "robbery." Just another in a LONG list of debatable decisions. :nod
Boom_Boom
08-05-2007, 12:47 AM
i voted yes

i had it 8-4 morales plus a KD
Nico
08-05-2007, 12:55 AM
Definitely not a robbery.
cyrillo
08-05-2007, 12:56 AM
No.
the_what
08-05-2007, 12:57 AM
No but Barrera was in their first fight. :yep
Jason997
08-05-2007, 12:58 AM
No, but Erik won IMO. Certainly a superior fighter.

- Jason
knockout
08-05-2007, 01:04 AM
no
andyZOR
08-05-2007, 01:29 AM
Definitely not a robbery.


Yea im gonna do that....I had a stream for it but I didnt bother ;P
digiram
08-05-2007, 01:35 AM
Saw the fight, and had him winning for sure.

Poor Erik.

Diaz isn't gonna last though. If Morales were still in his prime, he would've KO'd that cat a long time ago.
roadrunner
08-05-2007, 01:43 AM
Yes! He was robbed bigtime. Those judges stink!!!
Chert
08-05-2007, 01:47 AM
yep. he was definitely robbed. even diaz though he lost when the scores were announced before his name was said. :-(
BxN
08-05-2007, 01:53 AM
No but Barrera was in their first fight. :yep

Not really. Nice try though.

Morales wasn't robbed but he deserved the victory.
H .
08-05-2007, 03:38 AM
Close fight, I had Morales winning, I don't know about robbery
aramini
08-05-2007, 03:45 AM
morales deserved to win by a slightly larger margin than diaz winded up winning on the scorecards, thats why I couldn't believe it when they said "still". I thought it was just bad scoring - I didn't realize how bad until it was too late.
KillerInstinct
08-05-2007, 04:33 AM
No, I don't think he was "robbed". I think people who had him winning the fight are upset that Diaz got the nod because they wanted to see Morales finish his career with a title..
GARCIA
08-05-2007, 06:22 AM
Morales won the fight IMO
Bangis
08-05-2007, 06:25 AM
i thought morales did enough to win the fight on a close but clear decision.
Decebal
08-05-2007, 06:29 AM
Diaz won fair and square.

so why are people 2 to 1 saying he was robbed? Because they love Morales and wanted him to go out on a high?
Morrissey
08-05-2007, 06:48 AM
It was a close decision.

But he was not robbed. In the first place, Diaz was the champ, and IMO, EM did not impress the judges that much to get their nod.
Decebal
08-05-2007, 06:59 AM
They were blinded by sentimentalism. They expected him to win because they thought Diaz was a mediocre fighter. They were disappointed. :lol::lol::lol:

Move on, guys. Your idol has accepted his defeat graciously and is hanging up his gloves. Let him go. :D

Diaz is still a mediocre fighter though! It seems Morales was clearly shot and on top of that demotivated.
boxbox
08-05-2007, 07:08 AM
close, and could have gone either way. imo ,should have been erik...adios el terrible! man i feel so sad!
surreal deal
08-05-2007, 11:28 AM
Not really. Nice try though.

Morales wasn't robbed but he deserved the victory.
how does that work?:huh
Deslizer
08-05-2007, 12:33 PM
No, it was a close fight. You could give it either way.
PH|LLA
08-05-2007, 12:38 PM
fair decision.
ripcity
08-05-2007, 01:08 PM
It was a close fight but not a robbery. I had Morales up 114-113 but I wouldn't call it a robbery.
MagnaNasakki
08-05-2007, 01:47 PM
Not a robbery. Really close fight, I had Diaz 114-113. It was a tight fight.