McGrain
11-06-2008, 08:44 AM
Neither lost, and although Rocky has victories over ATG fighters on his ledger, he's often criticised for picking on "old men", or at least great fighters who were past their best.
In many ways the two are opposites. Lopez is a near perfect tecnhician who does everything very very well, a prescice puncher who is capable of altering punches mid-flight. Rocky has near limitless stamina and throws for the opponent, often, rather than a specific target. Louis talks about "being unable to move his arms for weeks" after his fight with Marciano because Rocky liked hitting at the arms fro they were an easy target. Not technically great, Rocky had the raw goods and was moulded.
Who do you think was better at boxing? Overall, not boxing as in on your toes, being a boxer, who was better at doing this sport? Is it even reasonable to compare them, coming, as they do, from completely different weights and styles?
Some footage:
[Only registered and activated users can see links]
[Only registered and activated users can see links]
Try to think of this independent of resume.
In many ways the two are opposites. Lopez is a near perfect tecnhician who does everything very very well, a prescice puncher who is capable of altering punches mid-flight. Rocky has near limitless stamina and throws for the opponent, often, rather than a specific target. Louis talks about "being unable to move his arms for weeks" after his fight with Marciano because Rocky liked hitting at the arms fro they were an easy target. Not technically great, Rocky had the raw goods and was moulded.
Who do you think was better at boxing? Overall, not boxing as in on your toes, being a boxer, who was better at doing this sport? Is it even reasonable to compare them, coming, as they do, from completely different weights and styles?
Some footage:
[Only registered and activated users can see links]
[Only registered and activated users can see links]
Try to think of this independent of resume.