PDA

View Full Version : Hamed was really good but


PH|LLA
08-10-2007, 12:17 AM
Pacquiao would've owned him. I mean i understand you guys can dislike Pacquiao's fans but the extent to which he is underrated is unbelievable.

PH|LLA
08-10-2007, 12:20 AM
Pac would have to change his style. Even the post-95 Hamed, post-97 even, would take him out with his single power counters (with Pac coming in like that).
:patsch

Chert
08-10-2007, 12:21 AM
yep. hate the fans, not the fighter. pac is a really good guy. he gives non-stop thrills and excitement to all boxing fans.

Carlos Primera
08-10-2007, 12:21 AM
pac wipes the floor with hamed imo. he gets a lot of backlash here on the forums, because of his fans. but seriously lets look past that, and not underate the guy. he demolishes barrera, K.O's the never been stopped morales and gives marquez, the guy hamed was ducking a very tough fight.

tays001
08-10-2007, 12:22 AM
yep. hate the fans, not the fighter. pac is a really good guy. he gives non-stop thrills and excitement to all boxing fans.

di second that . his fan are dillusional

WhataRock
08-10-2007, 12:22 AM
Probably
But Manny has been Ko'd and hurt by lesser punchers, not many people were hitting as hard as Naz at the time he was in his prime.
There is a massive chance that Naz could land some decisive bombs on the aggressive Pacman.

I would go as far to say that Pac only starts a slight favourite. Naz was a strong little dude and had a decent beard.

The MAB debacle had more to do with Naz's lack of passion and lack of proper training than people think. I mean even a fully pumped and fit to max Hamed probably would have been beaten by MAB but Ive seen some docos on Naz before the MAB fight and it appeared like boxing was the last thing on his mind.

And Im a pretty big Pac fan, I really liked Naz but Ive been a fan of Pac for some time.

tays001
08-10-2007, 12:23 AM
i think pac beat hamed but isay out of 10 fights pac wins 6-4

Chert
08-10-2007, 12:25 AM
di second that . his fan are dillusional

hate is too strong a word though... tolerance is the key.

MagnificentMatt
08-10-2007, 12:26 AM
Hameds dumb ass wasnt elusive as he thought....He would be walking the ring with his hands down to his knees and get caught by Pacs speed..IMO

Chert
08-10-2007, 12:27 AM
Pac hasnt been hurt in 8 years except when Agapito (RIP) tried to kill his testicles. Hes taken about hhmmm I say about a thousand bombs to the head and truthfully, I havent seen him wobbled.

People like to bring up his knock out when he was younger, yes he was a bit malnourished at the time, just not as strong mentally and physically.

If you look at his records when he started most of his wins were decisions.

His last 35 fights or so, he has an incredible KO ratio. Most against formidable opposition

yep. i agree.

PH|LLA
08-10-2007, 12:27 AM
Id say Pac wins this 8 times out of 10 lets not forget the fight Nas had against Kevin Kelly before he fought Barrera i mean Pacquiao is too relentless and too fast on the trigger for Naz

tays001
08-10-2007, 12:31 AM
but naz is fast to and i think has has more power then pac. if naz can conncet he can defenaly KO pac is pac the better fighter yes will pace best him out of 10 yes but naz is very fast too and pac may have trouble with his speed

PH|LLA
08-10-2007, 12:33 AM
Are you kidding? He's not underrated at all, most consider him the 2nd best P4P fighter in the world, it's his ridiculous Pac-maniacs who overrate the living shit outta him. Hamed by KO.

:patsch :nut

tays001
08-10-2007, 12:33 AM
I mean this is easy. Its funny Id even advise someone to go to boxrec on this one.

The guy was just not that strong when he started and gradually his body matured.

And as for Hamed, he probably thinks hes fast, PAC will make him look slow...I believe and you can look at the videotapes that PAC has the fastest hands in boxing today...Faster than Floyd.

no way is pac even faster then floyd or fastes in the world guzman is faster the pac

Carlos Primera
08-10-2007, 12:35 AM
Id say Pac wins this 8 times out of 10 lets not forget the fight Nas had against Kevin Kelly before he fought Barrera i mean Pacquiao is too relentless and too fast on the trigger for Naz
good point pharoah i just think pacs relentlessness, speed, quickness and power would be too much. if it befuddled JMM a very skilled boxer, the unorthodox hamed would have his hands full.

Jose FM
08-10-2007, 12:35 AM
Pac by 5th round KO

PH|LLA
08-10-2007, 12:36 AM
no way is pac even faster then floyd or fastes in the world guzman is faster the pac
this is just floyd nuthugging

Pac is faster than Floyd on his feet FOR SURE and arguably with his punches

But its not even a debate that Pac is MUCH quicker than Floyd on his feet

carras
08-10-2007, 12:39 AM
No, you goddamn idiot Pac fans overrate the fucking shit out of him. Goddamnit I hate this because I used to be a Pac fan. I pick Hamed over him based on styles, as I explained in my last thread, but even so, it's a 50/50 fight, and I wouldn't bet. Pac is a greater fighter, but in a swarmer vs a big puncher match, the big puncher usually ends up the winner.

I don't know shit? Gimme a fuckin break, just because I don't think Pac beats every fighter in history under 135 pounds like you morons makes me an idiot? Yeah OK.

ignore the hugger pea. when it comes to pac you just can't argue with them.

on the topic I like naz by mid-round KO, hamed's style is all wrong for pac.

PH|LLA
08-10-2007, 12:41 AM
Fuck no! Floyd has much better and faster movement. Pac just runs forward, Floyd is much better at playing angles and avoiding pressure and keeping the fight where he wants it. Pac just runs at you fast. Jesus!

You see Chimba? No, you probably don't because you agree with him.
yea all he does is run at you fast :patsch

floyd is better at playing angles because his upper body movement is better controlled. He's better at avoiding pressure cause his positioning is better. that has nothing to do with the fact that Pac is faster on his feet than Floyd

pathetic

BobDigi5060
08-10-2007, 12:50 AM
Pacman at this point would have won.. But not back in 05.

Chert
08-10-2007, 12:55 AM
people here underrate pac's hand speed... just look at the barrera fight. pac delivers 4-5 punch combos in no time at all.

achillesthegreat
08-10-2007, 03:24 AM
I don't think for a second PAC would own him. Hamed had a great chin and legendary power. If he is reading PACs shots and piercing his defence then he could make him pay HARD!

CASH_718
08-10-2007, 03:31 AM
Pac hasnt been hurt in 8 years except when Agapito (RIP) tried to kill his testicles. Hes taken about hhmmm I say about a thousand bombs to the head and truthfully, I havent seen him wobbled.

People like to bring up his knock out when he was younger, yes he was a bit malnourished at the time, just not as strong mentally and physically.

If you look at his records when he started most of his wins were decisions.

His last 35 fights or so, he has an incredible KO ratio. Most against formidable opposition

Larios had Pac man rocked bad. Morales had him hurt and so did JMM.

Oh and Pac man has NEVER and will NEVER fight a fighter with Hamad's power. Power like that comes along once every 20 years.

achillesthegreat
08-10-2007, 03:35 AM
Hamdan had him rocked...

...with a JAB!

ThePlugInBabies
08-10-2007, 04:21 AM
i imagine some of these pac nuthuggers whos entire boxing knowledge revolves around him have never even seen the prince fight and don't seem to realise the sort of power he had.

manny has to be clever in this one, if he thinks he can just walk through hameds bombs then he'll be tasting canvas in no time.

albaneze
08-10-2007, 05:03 AM
Hamed sucks, big time show off.

ron u.k.
08-10-2007, 07:27 AM
i'd take naz here and i don't underrate pac.barrera felt the need to completely change his style for naz because he knew the previous come forward in your face barrera would have been sparked.pacman would have a dilemma, does he stick to his usual swarming strategy and risk being tagged by bombs from angles he's never experienced or does he try to play it cuter, and can he play it cuter? i didn't particularily like naz or his fighting style,but the one unique thing about him was his power,possibly the hardest punching feather in history.hamed by ko.

Outboxer
08-10-2007, 07:37 AM
Naseem is highly underrated because of the fact that so many hated his personality (or the personality he depicted when he was in the ring).

To straight out say that Pac would murder him, no question, is just silly.

dave
08-10-2007, 08:06 AM
Ya I could have liked hamed...but the guy was a clown...so when he fought a top guy who did not like clowns he was spanked

cableguy
08-10-2007, 08:40 AM
Hamed sucks, big time show off.

Maybe....but the guy single handedly raised the profile of the featherweight division (and the purses that now go along with it).
For all his faults people have alot to thank the little 'show off' for. I for one thought the whole Naz package was great for boxing

pfUFYtXNN0A

Motor City Sam
08-10-2007, 10:35 AM
Maybe....but the guy single handedly raised the profile of the featherweight division (and the purses that now go along with it).
For all his faults people have alot to thank the little 'show off' for. I for one thought the whole Naz package was great for boxing

pfUFYtXNN0A

I agree. Boxing needs high profile personalities who fight exciting fights that people will tune in to see. That was Naz. I kind of liked him, so I made sure to watch when he was on. I also knew people who hated him, and they watched in hopes that he would get beat. It would have been better for the sport if he had continued to fight.

PH|LLA
08-10-2007, 11:50 AM
those who i dont know hamed or dont like is personality are dead wrong i saw many Hamed fights and was a big fan but i'm also realistic about where his skills stand relative to Pacquiao's.

He is simply a notch below

TIGEREDGE
08-10-2007, 12:57 PM
Probably
But Manny has been Ko'd and hurt by lesser punchers, not many people were hitting as hard as Naz at the time he was in his prime.
There is a massive chance that Naz could land some decisive bombs on the aggressive Pacman.

I would go as far to say that Pac only starts a slight favourite. Naz was a strong little dude and had a decent beard.

The MAB debacle had more to do with Naz's lack of passion and lack of proper training than people think. I mean even a fully pumped and fit to max Hamed probably would have been beaten by MAB but Ive seen some docos on Naz before the MAB fight and it appeared like boxing was the last thing on his mind.

And Im a pretty big Pac fan, I really liked Naz but Ive been a fan of Pac for some time.

BULLSHIT. I always knew that the little horrible arab would get beat when he fought some one of MABS calibre. He had very good punch and some unique skills but he was never great.

PACMAN WOULD DESTROY HIM

TIGEREDGE
08-10-2007, 12:58 PM
those who i dont know hamed or dont like is personality are dead wrong i saw many Hamed fights and was a big fan but i'm also realistic about where his skills stand relative to Pacquiao's.

He is simply a notch below

SPOT ON. GOOD BUT NOTHING GREAT THAT LITLE BASTARD HAMED

Jinx
08-10-2007, 01:11 PM
i see Pac as a superior fighter to prime Hamed, but the way Pac fights he could get decapitated by one of Hamed's out-of-nowhere uppercuts...a fight between them would've looked like the Hamed/Kelley fight, with both hitting the canvas and the fight ending explosively early...

ThePlugInBabies
08-10-2007, 01:57 PM
BULLSHIT. I always knew that the little horrible arab would get beat when he fought some one of MABS calibre. He had very good punch and some unique skills but he was never great.

PACMAN WOULD DESTROY HIM

how would he? pac would have to change his game, i'm sorry but you just don't walk through hamed and unload shots on him, if manny tried as great as he is he would be hitting the canvas, naz had absolutely brutal power.

manny would have to change his game like mab did in order to beat the prince.

Danny Ocean
08-10-2007, 02:00 PM
naseem ko 6

Brighton bomber
08-10-2007, 02:20 PM
I am a fan of Naz but Pac would beat him, maybe stop him late. Hamed was a very good fighter who hit even harder than Pac but style wise, I'd favour Pac. Hamed often leant back, with Pacs fast straight punches and fast explosive bursts of speed he would catch Hamed time and again. Hamed would undoubtedly give him problems with his awkward style and phenomenal power but I see Pac picking himself off the floor early (Perhaps more than once) and stopping him in the later rounds. Either way it would be an amazing fight.

Smazz20
08-10-2007, 02:23 PM
This is the type of match up that would result in a trilogy. A pure blockbuster of entertainment.

Ramshall1
08-10-2007, 02:34 PM
. . .he sucks.

Illmatic
08-10-2007, 03:24 PM
Anyone who comes straight at Hamed got knocked out, except for McColough who has a legendary chin. To beat him you need great defense and great counterpunching skills. Pac has the style to make it a great fight, but he would be kayoed.

And people forget Hamed had a great chin, the only time Ive ever thought he was actually hurt was against Kelley in the third round, before he floored Kelly.

Ramshall1
08-10-2007, 03:28 PM
I cant bvelieve no one said it yet. . . Hamed is a punk. . . he had a very questionable heart. After getting schooled by MAB, instead of saying o.k. lets get back to the drawing board and get more technique. . . he just fukcin quit like a spoiled child. Pac would have beat him into submission.

Illmatic
08-10-2007, 03:30 PM
I cant bvelieve no one said it yet. . . Hamed is a punk. . . he had a very questionable heart. After getting schooled by MAB, instead of saying o.k. lets get back to the drawing board and get more technique. . . he just fukcin quit like a spoiled child. Pac would have beat him into submission.

No heart? anyone who knocked him down got brutally kayoed in return. thats heart. In his fight against 5'11 daniel alicea, alicea knocked down hamed with two huge rights in a row. Hamed got up at the count of 1 and stalked him. In the second round he landed a huge uppercut, then a straight right, then another huge uppercut to knock him out. It was brutal, and he did it right-handed if i remember correctly.

Or getting hurt by Kelly and then knocking him down with a straight out of nowhere...the man has shown heart

LeedsLad
08-10-2007, 03:33 PM
The man had alot of heart, but unfortunately by the Barrera fight he had lost interest in the sport of boxing. This would have been a close fight, and i think both guys could KO each other, but id lean slightly towards Pac.

Morales vs. Hamed was a fight that could/should have happened, and would have been just as, if not more, entertaining than this IMO.

Ramshall1
08-10-2007, 03:34 PM
No heart? anyone who knocked him down got brutally kayoed in return. thats heart. In his fight against 5'11 daniel alicea, alicea knocked down hamed with two huge rights in a row. Hamed got up at the count of 1 and stalked him. In the second round he landed a huge uppercut, then a straight right, then another huge uppercut to knock him out. It was brutal, and he did it right-handed if i remember correctly.

Or getting hurt by Kelly and then knocking him down with a straight out of nowhere...the man has shown heart

he showed it against those guys, but the biggest test was how he would come back after getting schooled and slammed into the turnbuckle by MAB. . . he didnt even come back at all. That tells the story.

Illmatic
08-10-2007, 03:39 PM
he showed it against those guys, but the biggest test was how he would come back after getting schooled and slammed into the turnbuckle by MAB. . . he didnt even come back at all. That tells the story.

he fought Calvo, and he was booed for not knocking him out---a guy whos never been knocked out, and said fuck it, im going to go get fat and spend my money. I think that getting no support from his hometown fans had more to do with it than anything else

Ramshall1
08-10-2007, 03:47 PM
he fought Calvo, and he was booed for not knocking him out---a guy whos never been knocked out, and said fuck it, im going to go get fat and spend my money. I think that getting no support from his hometown fans had more to do with it than anything else

so he quit cause he got bood? even mnore reason to question his heart/desire. . . I didnt see that Calvo fight but if he was boo'd by his hometown he musta been pretty bad. good riddance.

tays001
08-10-2007, 04:25 PM
this is just floyd nuthugging

Pac is faster than Floyd on his feet FOR SURE and arguably with his punches

But its not even a debate that Pac is MUCH quicker than Floyd on his feet

your a dumb ass pharroh pac is not the fastest in the game and i can garuntee you PBF and Guzman are both faster then pac in hand speed and of foot

Nawfal
08-10-2007, 04:57 PM
i think hamed would ko him

faisal
08-10-2007, 05:14 PM
hamad would beat the dawg shit out of pac

Illmatic
08-10-2007, 05:17 PM
so he quit cause he got bood? even mnore reason to question his heart/desire. . . I didnt see that Calvo fight but if he was boo'd by his hometown he musta been pretty bad. good riddance.

another irrational hater

thewoo
08-10-2007, 05:23 PM
Hamed wasn't exactly hard to hit. His style would be perfect for Pacquiao who would be able to come up the middle with straight fast shots. Hamed would definatly taste the canvass.

However, Hamed was excellent at pulling shit out of the fire with a huge bomb, and I don't think that pacquiao has the defense to avoid those shots. I think that in the end Hamed would have his hand raised in a late KO victory.

Illmatic
08-10-2007, 05:37 PM
Hamed wasn't exactly hard to hit. His style would be perfect for Pacquiao who would be able to come up the middle with straight fast shots. Hamed would definatly taste the canvass.

However, Hamed was excellent at pulling shit out of the fire with a huge bomb, and I don't think that pacquiao has the defense to avoid those shots. I think that in the end Hamed would have his hand raised in a late KO victory.

Hamed under Ingle was very hard to hit. Check the fights with Robinson, Johnson, Medina

Slicknick56
08-10-2007, 05:39 PM
:lol:

you guys cant be serious. Hamed was quick and extremely unorthodox and were talkign about Hamed in his prime... he would drop Pacman in my opinion and probably KO him. He would pull back from Pacmans shots and land his own counters, same thing he always did. Pacman isnt exactly Barrera (who beats Pacman in their rematch)

Ramshall1
08-10-2007, 05:53 PM
another irrational hater

how is that irrational hate??? The dude quit for one of two reasons. . he got schooled/he got boo'd - if that makes him quit then the sport is better off without him - thats just common sense.

Illmatic
08-10-2007, 05:59 PM
how is that irrational hate??? The dude quit for one of two reasons. . he got schooled/he got boo'd - if that makes him quit then the sport is better off without him - thats just common sense.

i guess all fighters should fight until their 50 and half retarded

Ramshall1
08-10-2007, 06:08 PM
i guess all fighters should fight until their 50 and half retarded


now youre just being glib.

Motor City Sam
08-10-2007, 06:13 PM
Selfishly, I wish the Prince had gone back to the gym, refined his game, and got back in the ring. However, I am not one to criticize a guy for hanging up the gloves after he's made his money and lost his hunger for the sport. Boxing is not something you want to do while less than 100% dedicated.

TIGEREDGE
08-10-2007, 06:17 PM
No heart? anyone who knocked him down got brutally kayoed in return. thats heart. In his fight against 5'11 daniel alicea, alicea knocked down hamed with two huge rights in a row. Hamed got up at the count of 1 and stalked him. In the second round he landed a huge uppercut, then a straight right, then another huge uppercut to knock him out. It was brutal, and he did it right-handed if i remember correctly.

Or getting hurt by Kelly and then knocking him down with a straight out of nowhere...the man has shown heart

naz had heart and a good chin he just was not the exceptional fighter he was hyped up to be. He would of been a danger to any fighter in history because of his punch.

He was a good fighter with a dew unique skills AND

ALSO A HORRIBLE BASTARD

TIGEREDGE
08-10-2007, 06:20 PM
Hamed under Ingle was very hard to hit. Check the fights with Robinson, Johnson, Medina

mediana hit him a lot. Had him trouble. kevin kelly had him on the floor a few times. He was hard to hit for domestic fighters like steve robinson and a shot tom johnson (world class but not all that in his prime) and that over rated badillo mother fucker.

But when he fought anyone with a bit of world class left in him, he would not look so great.

TIGEREDGE
08-10-2007, 06:21 PM
I agree. Boxing needs high profile personalities who fight exciting fights that people will tune in to see. That was Naz. I kind of liked him, so I made sure to watch when he was on. I also knew people who hated him, and they watched in hopes that he would get beat. It would have been better for the sport if he had continued to fight.

eXCELLENT STAEMENT. NAZ DID ENTERTAIN AND THE SPORT NEEDS CHARACTERS LIKE HIM

BUT HE WAS A HORRIBLE BASTARD

Motor City Sam
08-10-2007, 06:28 PM
eXCELLENT STAEMENT. NAZ DID ENTERTAIN AND THE SPORT NEEDS CHARACTERS LIKE HIM

BUT HE WAS A HORRIBLE BASTARD

I would have disagreed with the "horrible bastard" part up until the time of that car crash after he retired. That was bad.

Toopretty
08-10-2007, 07:27 PM
That would be a must see fight but I got pac taking him out. Pac is not a slickster like barrera but his hand speed and power. I can see him catching Hamed one too many times. But Pacman may take a knockdown or two himself. That would be a classic battle that should of happend. I am replaying it in my mind..WOW.

kg0208
08-10-2007, 07:29 PM
Pacman and Hamed was 50/50 for me. To imply that either couldn't hurt the other is crazy IMO. Power wise Hamed has an advantage IMO, but who knows. Pacman has a speed advantage.

ThePlugInBabies
08-10-2007, 07:56 PM
I guess he was contemplating a comeback. But when he witnessed how Pac beat Barrera brutally, he decided not to. Pac could give him a more severe beating that what he did to Barrera.

or maybe it's because he also ended up in prison. :patsch

again your lack of boxing knowledge outside of pacman lets you down.

Toopretty
08-10-2007, 08:00 PM
Maybe pac would summon the spirit of 1000 gorillas or the stamina of 100 monkeys or something like that before the fight. With that being said, no way Pac would lose this fight with his Buddhist fanbase calling on the animal crac-ker gods to bring Pacqiao strength :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl

MagnaNasakki
08-10-2007, 08:19 PM
Pac gets hit alot. Hes not hard to find. He's a great fighter, fast, skilled, and powerful, but Hamed would hit him solidly just like lesser fighters have. And when Hamed clocks you, you get KOed.

Hamed KO 6

Morrissey
08-10-2007, 08:22 PM
Hamed will knock out PAc.

One punch and it would be over. That's all Hamed would have needed.

Ramshall1
08-10-2007, 08:25 PM
you cats who think Pac would not have a chance are truly delusional.

Toopretty
08-10-2007, 09:14 PM
Pac has more then a chance he is the favorite. Hamed has the punchers chance in this one

reed_man02
08-10-2007, 09:29 PM
Hamed wasn't exactly hard to hit. His style would be perfect for Pacquiao who would be able to come up the middle with straight fast shots. Hamed would definatly taste the canvass.

However, Hamed was excellent at pulling shit out of the fire with a huge bomb, and I don't think that pacquiao has the defense to avoid those shots. I think that in the end Hamed would have his hand raised in a late KO victory.

i agree. the only way to beat hamed is to give a barrera type performance. pac is nothing of the sort and would eventually go down as all of hamed opponents did after eating a wild bomb from hamed.

thewoo
08-10-2007, 11:43 PM
Hamed under Ingle was very hard to hit. Check the fights with Robinson, Johnson, Medina

I've seen all those fights. He had a very unothodox style and had really good waste movement for defense but he was there to be hit. Problem is a lot of the time guys hesitated to throw because of what they knew was coming back at him

blackstrider
08-11-2007, 12:05 AM
I believe PacMan could give Hamed his first KO loss. Pacman has good finishing touches. we all knew hes akward but he can withstand punishments especially the pac of today. and he is wise but people dnt see that, instead people see the akwardness of his.

Just dnt show pac that ur groggy or u will end up with a big wave from the ref just to save u from severe beating.

Thinman
08-11-2007, 03:14 AM
This is a very difficult prediction. :huh What if both of them end up on their feet? Who do you think can take the decission? 12 rds, nobody goes down....:think

I personally think that this fight won't go the distance....but it could go..... and that's why I am asking this question.

johnco
08-11-2007, 04:05 AM
Sweet Pea, you are really a nice guy I think.. But dude you have to get your head out of your ass...:rofl :rofl :rofl

If I retired young and is contemplating comeback..and then I saw the fighter who outclassed me got destroyed by this young Tornado.

What would I be thinking....(Stay with me here ok:good )

Would I be thinking geez I better make a comeback now, the guy who dominated me just got dismantled. My chances are great

or

Ohh shit, I was thinking about coming back but whew I dont know theres some new fighters out there now, maybe its not worth it. Maybe my time is over

This is real world thinking...And this is what boggles my mind about your intelligence and why I seriously question it...(for someone who post and drop boxers names from the 18th century)...
your reasoning is so fuckn way off.:patsch :patsch :patsch
a

johnco
08-11-2007, 04:06 AM
Sweet Pea, you are really a nice guy I think.. But dude you have to get your head out of your ass...:rofl :rofl :rofl

If I retired young and is contemplating comeback..and then I saw the fighter who outclassed me got destroyed by this young Tornado.

What would I be thinking....(Stay with me here ok:good )

Would I be thinking geez I better make a comeback now, the guy who dominated me just got dismantled. My chances are great

or

Ohh shit, I was thinking about coming back but whew I dont know theres some new fighters out there now, maybe its not worth it. Maybe my time is over

This is real world thinking...And this is what boggles my mind about your intelligence and why I seriously question it...(for someone who post and drop boxers names from the 18th century)...
your reasoning is so fuckn way off.:patsch :patsch :patsch

he got a pea brain... dont expect more :D:D

ron u.k.
08-11-2007, 05:10 AM
I cant bvelieve no one said it yet. . . Hamed is a punk. . . he had a very questionable heart. After getting schooled by MAB, instead of saying o.k. lets get back to the drawing board and get more technique. . . he just fukcin quit like a spoiled child. Pac would have beat him into submission.i don't believe pac would beat him but i agree with everything else you say.

tays001
08-11-2007, 12:33 PM
Maybe pac would summon the spirit of 1000 gorillas or the stamina of 100 monkeys or something like that before the fight. With that being said, no way Pac would lose this fight with his Buddhist fanbase calling on the animal crac-ker gods to bring Pacqiao strength :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl

yeah thats classic:rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :yep :yep :yep :yep :D :D :lol: :lol: :lol:

puga_ni_nana
08-11-2007, 12:48 PM
yeah. picking pac to beat hamed was really overrating pac. he is really no good and is waiting to be exposed.

tays001
08-11-2007, 01:08 PM
he got a pea brain... dont expect more :D:D

johnco you swing like tarzan off pac. your a straight hugger . " pac beat anyone cuz he hasb heart of 10,000 lions :yep :yep :yep

tays001
08-11-2007, 01:12 PM
yeah. picking pac to beat hamed was really overrating pac. he is really no good and is waiting to be exposed.

not in regards to this but most not all fan cuz some are knowledgable overate him saying crazy stuff like pac would ko every ATG and even saying he's greater p4p the SRR :-(

that why some over rate him. but saying he will beat naz is not overrating it just opinion

tays001
08-11-2007, 01:13 PM
No, but his fans act like he'd destroy Hamed JUST because Barrera soundly beat Naz and Pac destroyed Barrera.

yeah i hate that way of thinking:patsch

puga_ni_nana
08-11-2007, 01:32 PM
No, but his fans act like he'd destroy Hamed JUST because Barrera soundly beat Naz and Pac destroyed Barrera.


this could be the logic why people pick pac to beat naz. not a good one but it indicates the level of performance they perform if they will face elite fighters.

surely the style of pac is just right for naz. but it would not be that easy for hamed because pac is not kevin kelly.

PH|LLA
08-11-2007, 02:29 PM
lol at all you morons who think i'm a pac nuthugger cause i think he would soundly beat Nas. You've got your heads so far up your asses its rediculous.

Pac is better than Hamed. Period. and NO, I'm not a nuthugger. I don't think he would destroy a 400lb gorilla and i don't think he is the next coming of SRR. But you fucking haters think Gatti has more skills than Pacquiao and then say shit like "i used to be a fan" its pathetic

TIGEREDGE
08-11-2007, 02:41 PM
The real title should be called; has a fighter EVER been more overrated by his fans than Manny Pacquiao?

You can understand why his fans have got excited about him. A man who has KOd MAB and erik morales (twice), is something to get excited about

Who did hamed beat of this caliber?

All fans have a tendency to overate their fighter, but PAC has done an awful lot in his career. How many men have carried their power up all the weights that PAC did? They say fighters lose their punch when they go up in weight. PAC has jumped over 3 weight divisions (flyweight to Junior lightweight)

What did hamed do that was extrodinary? he was well matched and was in the right division at the right time. He would of been nowhere if had of come one the scene 10 years later, with PAC, MARQUEZ, BARERA AND MORALES

He only fought MAB because MAB was coming up in weight. he ducked a strong featherweight in MARQUEZ

TIGEREDGE
08-11-2007, 02:43 PM
lol at all you morons who think i'm a pac nuthugger cause i think he would soundly beat Nas. You've got your heads so far up your asses its rediculous.

Pac is better than Hamed. Period. and NO, I'm not a nuthugger. I don't think he would destroy a 400lb gorilla and i don't think he is the next coming of SRR. But you fucking haters think Gatti has more skills than Pacquiao and then say shit like "i used to be a fan" its pathetic

GREAT STATEMENT. Pac is not the new sugar ray, but he has achieved so much, he has a right to be overrated