PDA

View Full Version : Bennie Briscoe Vs. James Scott


la-califa
06-21-2007, 10:46 PM
This would be a battle of two of the biggest baddest, Baldest contenders to never win a world championship. At a fictional 168 pounds since it pits a 160 & a 175 pound fighter. 12 rounds.

Doc McCoy
06-22-2007, 12:11 AM
Briscoe by a hair. :lol:

Seriously though I think Bennie has too much experience for Scott, even though he had decent skills and great stamina.
Briscoe would work the body early on to slow Scott down for the left-hooks and overhand rights that would be coming his way circa Rd7.

Scott would know doubt tag Bennie but doubt whether he could seriously hurt him.

Would be a war of attrition though.

brownpimp88
06-22-2007, 12:28 AM
James scott at 175 was a monster, too bad he was short lived.

Titan1
07-03-2007, 08:45 PM
Scott by a razor thin decision, since 168 at that time was technically light heavy anyway.

brownpimp88
07-03-2007, 08:47 PM
I pick scott to win this fight since briscoe was proven to be inconsistent and scott had a solid resume for a guy with less than 30 fights. He also naturally bigger.

robert ungurean
07-03-2007, 08:52 PM
Brisco was a better fighter.
Look what happened to Scott when he fought pressure fighters.
Braxton & Martin. He could only fight going forward. Brisco would have had something to say about that.