View Full Version : If Hatton fought the version of Oscar who fought pacman..?
JIM KELLY
12-22-2008, 12:56 AM
Hatton beats the crap out of the weight drained golden boy in 3 rounds. Agree ?
GazOC
12-22-2008, 01:44 AM
Maybe not, Oscar was half-effective the few times Pac was there in front of him.......
Olu G. Rotimi
12-22-2008, 03:41 AM
As you know I am no fan of ODLH or Goldengirl as his detractorslike to call him however I think Hatton would suffer a brutal knockout against any version of ODLH. Hatton aggressiveness palys in to ODLH's strong points. I am not fooled by the Pacman fight. It was all to do with Pacman's style and dominannce. Styles make fights.
SouthpawSlayer
12-22-2008, 03:44 AM
3 rounds no way, very close fight
mattress
12-22-2008, 05:09 AM
DLH is well finished. Pac is a great fighter but to suggest that DLH's poor show (again) was due to Pac's tactics or talent is way off the mark. A near-prime DLH would soundly beat Pac or Hatton at 147. Oscar of today beats neither.
icemax
12-22-2008, 05:10 AM
ODLH looked like the living dead against Pac....Hatton would have killed him.
Grant1
12-22-2008, 05:32 AM
Hatton wins in the same manner that Pac-man did for me.
Nope.
Pacquiao's speed and variety really highlighted De La Hoya's failings. Hatton trying to wrestle him and beat him up on the inside...I think it would take longer to be effective like that.
BIG WORM
12-22-2008, 06:40 AM
DLH looked weak i dont think he'd take hattons body shots.... he'd go down like castillo
robpalmer135
12-22-2008, 07:03 AM
simular result with an earlair stoppage.
Beeston Brawler
12-22-2008, 08:26 AM
Tough to say.
Hatton is a more proficient body puncher than Pac, and it is an area that DLH has been proved to be vulnerable in the past.
However, if he tried to stand and fight, rather than like a buzzsaw it would take much longer.
So.....
Early blowout or wide a UD
hit me HARDER
12-22-2008, 08:36 AM
Late round bodyshot stoppage or a UD in favour of Ricky. I honestly think it was a weight issue with DLH against Pac.
I still think Oscar may have something left in the tank at a higher weight.
D-MAC
12-22-2008, 08:57 AM
ODLH looked like the living dead against Pac....Hatton would have killed him.
Hatton can kill the living dead???
When zombies rise to claim the earth, Ricky's the fucker that I'm gonna be calling:good
icemax
12-22-2008, 08:59 AM
Hatton can kill the living dead???
When zombies rise to claim the earth, Ricky's the fucker that I'm gonna be calling:good
:yep:yep
hit me HARDER
12-22-2008, 08:59 AM
Hatton can kill the living dead???
When zombies rise to claim the earth, Ricky's the fucker that I'm gonna be calling:good
Anyone can kill the Living Dead, except for those 28 Days Later fuckers!!
D-MAC
12-22-2008, 09:02 AM
Anyone can kill the Living Dead, except for those 28 Days Later fuckers!!
Fast moving Zombies are harder to kill:deal
Govanmauler
12-22-2008, 12:01 PM
Fast moving Zombies are harder to kill:deal
Fucking fast zombies , I bloody hate fast zombies :lol:
oh and yeah Hatton would beat him down but nowhere near 3 rounds , between the 8th and 10th !
PowerPuncher
12-22-2008, 01:28 PM
Delahoya would have dismantled Hatton and ko'd him, Hatton can't throw fast shots like Pacquaio that would beat Delahoya to the punch
JIM KELLY
12-22-2008, 03:36 PM
Delahoya did not look dangerous or stood a chance from round 1. He looked awfully weak, Ricky would have put a pounding on him.
icemax
12-22-2008, 03:50 PM
Delahoya would have dismantled Hatton and ko'd him, Hatton can't throw fast shots like Pacquaio that would beat Delahoya to the punch
I think that you must have been watching a different fight :nut Oscar looked on his last legs just getting into the ring
icemax
12-22-2008, 03:51 PM
Fast moving Zombies are harder to kill:deal
Fast moving zombies don't exist, they shuffle, I thought everyone knew that :-(
D-MAC
12-23-2008, 06:26 AM
Fast moving zombies don't exist, they shuffle, I thought everyone knew that :-(
Dawn of the Dead (2004) = Fast Moving Zombies
Modern cinema has to change things up; slow movers are out of fashion these days.
icemax
12-23-2008, 06:30 AM
Dawn of the Dead (2004) = Fast Moving Zombies
I meant in real life....real life = no fast moving zombies . Movies just take the truth and distort it :nono. If you want to see for yourself what I say is true, just go to Leeds . Leeds = shuffling zombies :deal
D-MAC
12-23-2008, 06:47 AM
I meant in real life....real life = no fast moving zombies . Movies just take the truth and distort it :nono. If you want to see for yourself what I say is true, just go to Leeds . Leeds = shuffling zombies :deal
:lol:
Yeah, Friday and Saturday nights in Belfast are kinda like that too.
icemax
12-23-2008, 06:52 AM
Yeah, Friday and Saturday nights in Belfast are kinda like that too.
:yep
Beeston Brawler
12-23-2008, 07:04 AM
I meant in real life....real life = no fast moving zombies . Movies just take the truth and distort it :nono. If you want to see for yourself what I say is true, just go to Leeds . Leeds = shuffling zombies :deal
BS.
We just enjoy playing in League One. :roll:
Govanmauler
12-23-2008, 07:35 AM
Dawn of the Dead (2004) = Fast Moving Zombies
Modern cinema has to change things up; slow movers are out of fashion these days.
I know !!
I cant beleive that Romero himself broke the cardinal rule in Land of the dead
but then thats why those films are shit compared to the origianl 3 !
Diary of the dead was ok tho.
( how f**kin off topic is that ! )
icemax
12-23-2008, 08:05 AM
BS.
We just enjoy playing in League One. :roll:
:rofl:rofl We'll see you down there next year:good
Boxing Gloves
12-23-2008, 12:03 PM
He'd have a good chance, Oscar looked awful and very slow and he couldnt pull the trigger.
Infern0
12-23-2008, 09:56 PM
No oscar would still have too much for Hatton imo, hatton is no pac-man
Realspitts
12-24-2008, 12:20 AM
tough to call b/c were talking about the hoya version that fought pac...
pac didnt allow hoya to get into any type of rhythm what so ever. and with a stationary, strait up & down fighter like hatton i could see oscar pulling the trigger more often. imo it would have been close fight with the edge going to hatton.
icemax
12-24-2008, 04:36 AM
No oscar would still have too much for Hatton imo, hatton is no pac-man
Oscar was a gunshy, shuffling, shambolic shell of his former self...my daughter would have had too much power and movement for him on that night.:bbb
mattress
12-24-2008, 04:51 AM
No oscar would still have too much for Hatton imo, hatton is no pac-man
Are you serious? Seriously deluded morelike.
john b
12-24-2008, 06:33 AM
Hatton would have won because oscar looked like a skeleton on fight night, which was rather predictable since he hadn't be a WW for nearly 7 years.
widdy
12-24-2008, 08:57 AM
wouldent of stood a chance against hatton,to much power,more than pacman has,and a better chin,it would of been quicker,i will say it again,anyone who thinks hatton is a sitting duck,no movement,fights bums, ect,know fookall about boxing
vBulletin® v3.8.0, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.