View Full Version : Better fighters vikings or aztecs,
TRUEBELIEVER 66
02-04-2009, 08:06 PM
The Scandanavians, Danes, or the Noreweigenes, the blondes, with blue eyes, up against the Dark, hair, skin, Mexico, Brazil, Cuba, etc, what group produces better tougher fighters in your opinion?
mrplow182
02-04-2009, 08:33 PM
Nobody beats the Spartans
TRUEBELIEVER 66
02-04-2009, 08:48 PM
Nobody beats the Spartans
Whats a spartan?
mrplow182
02-04-2009, 08:50 PM
Whats a spartan?
These badasses............
[Only registered and activated users can see links]
Out of your list Vikings win everytime over Aztecs
mrplow182
02-04-2009, 08:51 PM
But Spartans beat Vikings by Split Decision.......
TRUEBELIEVER 66
02-04-2009, 09:09 PM
But Spartans beat Vikings by Split Decision.......
hmm OK I WANNA SEE A SPARTAN VS AN AZTEC OF EQUAL TALENT IN A REAL FIGHT,,:hat
mrplow182
02-04-2009, 09:10 PM
hmm OK I WANNA SEE A SPARTAN VS AN AZTEC OF EQUAL TALENT IN A REAL FIGHT,,:hat
Boxing or weapons??
TRUEBELIEVER 66
02-04-2009, 09:10 PM
These badasses............
[Only registered and activated users can see links]
Out of your list Vikings win everytime over Aztecs
hOW MANY YEARS AGO WAS THAT? AND WHERE WERE THEY LINED UP AT?
A Rock
02-04-2009, 09:11 PM
not to be racist or anything but ppl from central and south america are overall smaller than the vikings.
But at the same time Vikings werent organized soldiers, they were bands of criminals. Aztecs would have better bow and arrow style advantage
TRUEBELIEVER 66
02-04-2009, 09:11 PM
boxing or weapons??
either or? It dosent matter?
mrplow182
02-04-2009, 09:13 PM
hOW MANY YEARS AGO WAS THAT? AND WHERE WERE THEY LINED UP AT?
At their peak they'd be around 600 BC....that photo was probably based on the Persian wars but I'm not sure.....
Spartans would be too old school and rough for the Aztecs
mrplow182
02-04-2009, 09:15 PM
either or? It dosent matter?
If there were weapons the Aztecs might squeeze a win.......Spartan kids were tought to fight from about 4 years old though....they'd win at boxing
JIM KELLY
02-05-2009, 12:31 AM
Vikings were ruthless, they would gang bang your wives, sisters, mommas and just bounce out afterwards like nothing happened!
Mongols were some crazy azz warriors.
Come on.
Vikings whoop their ass. It looks like Prescott-Khan on a mass scale.
Beeston Brawler
02-05-2009, 04:34 AM
The Mongols were pretty badass - Temujin KO2 Montezuma
Vikings win easily. The fact they have iron weapons as a pose to stone helps tremendously.
A good percentage of this forum will have viking genetics. Especially men in Northern England/Scotland.
Think carefully before admitting cavemen could beat you :yep
icemax
02-05-2009, 06:18 AM
The Mongols were pretty badass - Temujin KO2 Montezuma
Montezuma II was chinny, the first time a Spanish journeyman rolled up it was lights out
Beeston Brawler
02-05-2009, 09:58 AM
Montezuma II was chinny, the first time a Spanish journeyman rolled up it was lights out
:yep
Shaka Zulu?
He might have been a bit gunshy though......
icemax
02-06-2009, 10:30 AM
:yep
Shaka Zulu?
He might have been a bit gunshy though......
Gunshy, possibly, but he would be the first top class boxing/goalkeeper combo that I have ever come across
markedwardscott
02-09-2009, 09:58 PM
Intriguing question. If you mean boxers, have to go with Aztecs.
dwilson
02-10-2009, 04:08 AM
Aztecs were fags. Walking round in underpants and throwing shitty sticks at each other.
[Only registered and activated users can see links]
VS.
[Only registered and activated users can see links]
Enough said.
Beeston Brawler
02-10-2009, 07:33 AM
Talk about a well balanced post.
Don't blame the TFFP, blame Google.
surreal deal
02-10-2009, 08:39 AM
Whats a spartan?
You've never heard of Sparta?
Isnt this a lounge question guys?
Beeston Brawler
02-10-2009, 09:05 AM
If that's the best you can do, you need to turn it in sunshine - or at least try Yahoo! first :good
vBulletin® v3.8.0, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.