Aztec fighters vs vikings fighers.

[TRUEBELIEVER 66]

What Nationalities produce the toughest and most skilled fighters, the DANES, SCANDANAVIANS, NORWEIGEINS, or the Aztecs from countries such as MEXICO, CUBA, BRAZIL, SOUTH AMERICA ETC...
Thoughts anyone??

[TFFP]

:nut

Retarded question that you would know the answer to yourself with a seconds research.

Latin America has a history in the game of boxing. Scandinavia does not.

[elindiomonzon]

First, the Aztecs are from the region of central america, south american countries have other native tribes with different names( mocovies, guarani, inca etc). As for your question, native latin american fighters are the toughest men that this world "created". In the history of boxing there are 200+ latin world champions(mexico 100+,PR 50+, argentina 40+, colombia 40+ etc), where as for scandinavia i think that the number of champions doesn't reach the 20s, and by the way the aztecs or any latin american indian is way tougher than any viking warrior ( there are exceptions obviously)

[TRUEBELIEVER 66]

First, the Aztecs are from the region of central america, south american countries have other native tribes with different names( mocovies, guarani, inca etc). As for your question, native latin american fighters are the toughest men that this world "created". In the history of boxing there are 200+ latin world champions(mexico 100+,PR 50+, argentina 40+, colombia 40+ etc), where as for scandinavia i think that the number of champions doesn't reach the 20s, and by the way the aztecs or any latin american indian is way tougher than any viking warrior ( there are exceptions obviously)
:good Thanks good insight...
I see your title of Monzon, are you a great fan of Carlos?

[elindiomonzon]

yes im argentinean , him and kostya tszyu are my favorite fighters

[Uncle Sam]

Actually the Aztecs roamed in Mexico which is in North America.

[TRUEBELIEVER 66]

First, the Aztecs are from the region of central america, south american countries have other native tribes with different names( mocovies, guarani, inca etc). As for your question, native latin american fighters are the toughest men that this world "created". In the history of boxing there are 200+ latin world champions(mexico 100+,PR 50+, argentina 40+, colombia 40+ etc), where as for scandinavia i think that the number of champions doesn't reach the 20s, and by the way the aztecs or any latin american indian is way tougher than any viking warrior ( there are exceptions obviously)
YES i can see the dark skin prevails, stronger bloodlines also:huh, Vikings always brag about thier toughness but when they meet up with strong guy's with Aztec backgrounds they lose 90% of the time..

[moorser]

celtic fighters such as us irish and scottish are toughest fighters and have the best chins - wayne mccullough strongest chin in boxing ever fact hamed and harrison and morales couldnt even move him ! steve collins and barry mcguigan , john duddy . the list is endless

[Secern]

Is the viking drunk? If so I choose him over any Aztec.

:drink

[VanillaKilla]

LOL at all the people trying to represent their ethnic group as the best fighters! Since when do people get to take credit for other peoples accomplishments? I haven't read someone claim that their the toughest fighter yet. So ill be the first person to state that I can hold my own :smoke

[VanillaKilla]

YES i can see the dark skin prevails, stronger bloodlines also:huh, Vikings always brag about thier toughness but when they meet up with strong guy's with Aztec backgrounds they lose 90% of the time..

Vikings used to be great warriors, guess what? A shit load of them died in battle. Same with the greatest aztec warriors. We are probably descendants of farmers or merchants. If your latin american then you might even have most of your genes from spanish europeans. Look at oscar delahoya and julio cesar chavez and marco antonio barrera. dark skin my ass. Stop being an ignorant jackass

[Slider75]

YES i can see the dark skin prevails, stronger bloodlines also:huh, Vikings always brag about thier toughness but when they meet up with strong guy's with Aztec backgrounds they lose 90% of the time..
are you talking about present time or what? the "real" vikings never meet the Aztecs.. and lucky for the aztecs they didn`t!:hey

In Scandinavia boxing never been popular, until recently! if you want to see who is stronger, challenge them in strongman events!

[markedwardscott]

In the modern era Mexico produces the toughest fighters IMO.

[ZippyMan]

First, the Aztecs are from the region of central america, south american countries have other native tribes with different names( mocovies, guarani, inca etc). As for your question, native latin american fighters are the toughest men that this world "created". In the history of boxing there are 200+ latin world champions(mexico 100+,PR 50+, argentina 40+, colombia 40+ etc), where as for scandinavia i think that the number of champions doesn't reach the 20s, and by the way the aztecs or any latin american indian is way tougher than any viking warrior ( there are exceptions obviously)

Um OK. There are more people in Mexico City than there are Scandinavians. Boxing is a poor mans sport and Scandinavia is the richest area on earth. South America is for the most part impoverished.

The average VIKING WARRIOR would beat the living shit out of the average Aztec, Inca, Maya, etc,.... Vikings beat the crap out of Spaniards during their summer vacations. The Spaniards (pre-modern firearms) while vastly outnumbered destroyed all the major Central and South American powers. In one battle, a few hundred Spaniards slashed their way through 10,000 South American warriors without losing many Spaniards at all. It is clear that the Europeans used to bad dudes and the Vikings were the baddest of them all.

All that said, modern day South Americans on average beat the shit out of modern day Scandinavians. The Vikings either died out or settled in warmer climates.

[Hrak]

The Vikings either died out or settled in warmer climates.
No actually they just got domesticated

[Quick'N'Slick]

Haha good point

[Viking Worrier]

There is much wisdom in this thread.








:rofl

[Ivo]

Yeah, that was some funny sh!t!

[elindiomonzon]

its obvious that you don't know anything about history, a hundred spaniards?they easily slashed their way?no way, the war between the spaniars and the querandi indians from argentina lasted over 30 years and the casualties for each side were over the hundred thousands. the vikings had swords, axes and very sophisticated weapons for that time, native americans just had bows and arrows they fought with toughness and warrior spirit, the vikings without their sword are nothing, I'm not saying that native americans will beat any viking just that they are way tougher there is no doubt about it

[VanillaKilla]

to counteract your point, the vikings may have had swords... but they were also disadvantaged in their own way. They had NO idea how to fight in the rainforest, did not know the terrain, and were suceptible to disease and the warm climate. (their arent really many mosquitos in the climate vikings come from). Plus its much easier to defend a land then to succesfully subdue a land.(not attack and conquer but subdue (look at america in the middle east). Now imagine the natives tried to conquer the frozen mountain land of the vikings.... They would also be at a huge disadvantage. You got to take all things into account buddy. And whats with this nationalistic bullshit. No people are genetically "tougher" then anyone else. Anyone who says that is weak himself and looking for somone else to give him a reason to say hes tough. UNLESS we are talking about the french. They clearly do suck :bart

[elindiomonzon]

LOL I dont even know why Im answering to this thread but anyways its all good

[TRUEBELIEVER 66]

its obvious that you don't know anything about history, a hundred spaniards?they easily slashed their way?no way, the war between the spaniars and the querandi indians from argentina lasted over 30 years and the casualties for each side were over the hundred thousands. the vikings had swords, axes and very sophisticated weapons for that time, native americans just had bows and arrows they fought with toughness and warrior spirit, the vikings without their sword are nothing, I'm not saying that native americans will beat any viking just that they are way tougher there is no doubt about it
Put the Vikings, Scandanaivans, Danish, Noreweigens, against the toughest from Mexico, Brazil, Cuba etc, which has produced the toughest fighters-boxers?? from the past or present??

[VanillaKilla]

who produced the best fighters/boxers dosent mean jack shit! Professional fighting is and always will be a sport. Certain people may or may not adapt better to different rules sets. But in a real fight, bare handed, no rules.... i dont think you can really say who would be tougher than who if everyone was the same size. the toughness in sports has nothing to do with eye gouges, biting, strangling. In a real fight toughness isnt all that counts, its about whos the craziest savage mofo on the block. and im sure all cultures have their fair share of crazy mofos.:yep

[Sardu]

Italian-american fighters have great chins: LaMotta, Marciano, Basilio, etc.

[Slider75]

its obvious that you don't know anything about history, a hundred spaniards?they easily slashed their way?no way, the war between the spaniars and the querandi indians from argentina lasted over 30 years and the casualties for each side were over the hundred thousands. the vikings had swords, axes and very sophisticated weapons for that time, native americans just had bows and arrows they fought with toughness and warrior spirit, the vikings without their sword are nothing, I'm not saying that native americans will beat any viking just that they are way tougher there is no doubt about it
Yeah, fighting with a bow and arrow against man with a sword makes you tougher... no doubt:roll: the same way any little gangsta today is a badass with a gun in his hands!

In what way was the native american tougher than vikings? i guess the vikings used their sparetime watching tv and drinking beers, and when they was hungry they just sailed to the nearest mcdonald for some fastfood!

[SlicedAlone]

Wasn't professional boxing outlawed in Sweden? Boxing isn't a part of scandinavian culture at least not as much as latin cultures. Here in Cali most boxing gyms the few boxing gyms seem to be mostly Paisas (mexican nationals) with some Chicanos and blacks and few whites. But yeah, considering their success in strongman events im sure they're pretty physically capable. Its just not a big deal there I guess.

[Slider75]

Wasn't professional boxing outlawed in Sweden? Boxing isn't a part of scandinavian culture at least not as much as latin cultures. Here in Cali most boxing gyms the few boxing gyms seem to be mostly Paisas (mexican nationals) with some Chicanos and blacks and few whites. But yeah, considering their success in strongman events im sure they're pretty physically capable. Its just not a big deal there I guess.
Yes true, pro-boxing was not allowed in Sweden for some years, dont really know for how long, but guess its been quite long time. In Scandinavia and rest of north-europe boxing is about as popular as handball is in USA or England! and the biggest names in boxing coming out of scandinavia is Mikkel Kessler and Ingemar Johanson, there is a few more in history.. but dont think many know them! So compare that to the best boxers coming out of south-america, is ridicilous... and i think the treadstarter know that aswell:silly

Another thing is that Mogens Palle was/is the only major promotor in the area! That makes their chances to produce great boxers even smaller..

[Kush]

An Aztec would decapitate a viking.

[ZippyMan]

its obvious that you don't know anything about history, a hundred spaniards?they easily slashed their way?no way, the war between the spaniars and the querandi indians from argentina lasted over 30 years and the casualties for each side were over the hundred thousands. the vikings had swords, axes and very sophisticated weapons for that time, native americans just had bows and arrows they fought with toughness and warrior spirit, the vikings without their sword are nothing, I'm not saying that native americans will beat any viking just that they are way tougher there is no doubt about it

Don't make me dig through a bunch of books to prove my point. There was a battle in Peru where a couple hundred Spaniards killed around 10,000 natives. The Spaniards lost less than 100.

The English and the Spanish didn't take over the world by being wimps but they hurt their gene pool in the process by sending their best out to die.

- The thread is now officially dead

[SlicedAlone]

I remember Kessler damn near decapitating Andrade.

[El Puma]

I'm going to go with the Vikings. It's not even close really.

[markedwardscott]

Battling Nelson considered himself a descendant of vikings.

[Only registered and activated users can see links]

[Slider75]

Battling Nelson considered himself a descendant of vikings.

[Only registered and activated users can see links]
Yes, Oscar Battling Nelson was born in Denmark, so he is descendant of vikings! Compared to him and old guys like Ad Wolgast, Librado Andrades chin would be as fragile as Amir Khans!

Battling would rather die in the ring than lose, True viking warrior spirit!

[VX.Nefarious]

Don't make me dig through a bunch of books to prove my point. There was a battle in Peru where a couple hundred Spaniards killed around 10,000 natives. The Spaniards lost less than 100.

The English and the Spanish didn't take over the world by being wimps but they hurt their gene pool in the process by sending their best out to die.

- The thread is now officially dead

:lol:
the fuckin Europeans were far more technologically advanced. what else do you expect?


man this thread cracks me up :rofl:rofl:rofl

[VX.Nefarious]

btw this is the 1st time i ever visited the european section

[Kampioni]

btw this is the 1st time i ever visited the european section

Welcome!

@thread: Vikings were the first to discover North America, and at the time of the arrivial im sure they were far more advanced than the natives.

[Squire]

Why is a whole continent vs Scandinavia fair? How about South America vs Europe?

[anarci]

First, the Aztecs are from the region of central america, south american countries have other native tribes with different names( mocovies, guarani, inca etc). As for your question, native latin american fighters are the toughest men that this world "created". In the history of boxing there are 200+ latin world champions(mexico 100+,PR 50+, argentina 40+, colombia 40+ etc), where as for scandinavia i think that the number of champions doesn't reach the 20s, and by the way the aztecs or any latin american indian is way tougher than any viking warrior ( there are exceptions obviously):yep:yep:good

[anarci]

celtic fighters such as us irish and scottish are toughest fighters and have the best chins - wayne mccullough strongest chin in boxing ever fact hamed and harrison and morales couldnt even move him ! steve collins and barry mcguigan , john duddy . the list is endless:lol::lol::lol::lol:

[anarci]

All that said, modern day South Americans and Mexicans on average beat the shit out of modern day Scandinavians. The Vikings either died out or settled in warmer climates.:deal Well at least you got that part right. Took the words out of my mouth!

[VanillaKilla]

Aztecs are at a disadvantage due to their size. Average viking is around 6 feet tall, average aztec is most likley 5'6.

If it happens in the jungle, Vikings loose due to death by ambush

If it happens in the snow at norway, the aztecs freeze to death. Wait, did the aztecs even have boats?? :think

[Kampioni]

Vikings had strong armor, Aztecs only form of armor were thier booty shorts lol

Even in a jungle i think Aztec's get wrecked.

[anarci]

Aztecs are at a disadvantage due to their size. Average viking is around 6 feet tall, average aztec is most likley 5'6.

If it happens in the jungle, Vikings loose due to death by ambush

If it happens in the snow at norway, the aztecs freeze to death. Wait, did the aztecs even have boats?? :think Well ive also heard that the Aztecs were bigger before the spanish brought diseases and shit that made them sick and made the gene bull smaller but its probably just some myth but who knows:huh Aztecs had boats, infact i know for sure that the Mayans were known Mariners and i saw something on the History channel how they use to sail like thousands of miles centurys ago.

[anarci]

Vikings had strong armor, Aztecs only form of armor were thier booty shorts lol

Even in a jungle i think Aztec's get wrecked. Dude you got to do your homework and stop making idiotic remarks. Aztecs had great shields read a little bit before making assumptions.

[randeris]

What Nationalities produce the toughest and most skilled fighters, the DANES, SCANDANAVIANS, NORWEIGEINS, or the Aztecs from countries such as MEXICO, CUBA, BRAZIL, SOUTH AMERICA ETC...
Thoughts anyone??
are you for real?

[Vysotsky]

Italian-american fighters have great chins: LaMotta, Marciano, Basilio, etc.

Something has to be said for Croatia (Chuvalo, Mavrovic)

[VX.Nefarious]

Vikings had strong armor, Aztecs only form of armor were thier booty shorts lol

Even in a jungle i think Aztec's get wrecked.

P4P no armor, only weapons who wins?

[Kampioni]

P4P no armor, only weapons who wins?

Vikings hands down

[sallywinder]

[Only registered and activated users can see links]

[Only registered and activated users can see links]

After eight months of excavation, archaeologists from the National Institute of Anthropology and History (INAH) have located, 12 meters below , the entrance to the tunnel leading to a series of galleries beneath the Temple of the Feathered Serpent, in the Archaeologcial Area of Teotihuacan, where the remains of rulers of the ancient city could have been deposited.

In a tour made by to site today with the media, archaeologist Sergio Chavez Gomez, director of the Tlalocan Project went below the ground and announced the advances in the systematic exploration undertaken by the INAH of the underground conduit, which was closed for about 1,800 years by the inhabitants of Teotihuacan themselves and where no one has gone in since then.

INAH specialists hope to enter the tunnel in a couple of months and will be the first to enter after hundreds of years since it was closed. This excavation, which represents the most profound that has been done in the pre-Hispanic site, is part of the commemorations for the first 100 years of uninterrupted archaeological explorations (made in 1910) also called the City of Gods.

Gómez Chávez explained that the tunnel passes under the Temple of the Feathered Serpent, the most important building of the Citadel, “and the entry was located a few meters from the pyramid.

Access is by a vertical shaft of about five meters per side down to a depth of 14 meters from the surface, the entrance leads into a long corridor with an estimated length of 100 meters which ends in a series of underground chambers excavated in the rock.

[PaddyD1983]

No actually they just got domesticated

Worst thing that can happen to any fighter. In the words of Micky;

"You got civilised"

[sparta]

SPARTANS & AZTECS WOULD DESTROY ANY VIKING.:lol: IM HALF N HALF.

[Sdt]

Something has to be said for Croatia (Chuvalo, Mavrovic)

Lol Chuvalo is Canadian

EDIT: just wiki'ed it and your right his parents are croatians lol owned myseld!

[emanuel_augustus]

This thread might be of interest:

[Only registered and activated users can see links]

[cross_trainer]

[Only registered and activated users can see links]

[EnzoRD]

What Nationalities produce the toughest and most skilled fighters, the DANES, SCANDANAVIANS, NORWEIGEINS, or the Aztecs from countries such as MEXICO, CUBA, BRAZIL, SOUTH AMERICA ETC...
Thoughts anyone??

This is a somewhat misleading argument from the thread title.

Vikings settled all over Britain, and Russia. 60% of Scots and people from Northern England share the same genes as Norwegians.
The vikings basically raided everywhere around Europe. Whereas didn't the Aztec just die out after the Spanish breathed on them? Half of them got wiped out by smallpox.

Brazil has a population of what. 190,000,000? of all different ethnic groups anyway. mostly white (48%), Multi-ethnic (half white/half black etc 43%. 7% black, and 1% Asian.

Whereas the Scandinavians are mostly middle-class, well off, far more educated than anywhere in the western world, have the highest degree of health, basically live with the highest standards of living on the planet. And only have a population of 20 million.

Basically. The question is retarded. Especially since boxing isn't very popular in Scandinavia and boxing is banned in places like Norway. Everyone of their boxers have to travel to a foreign country to fight.

However. What would happen if you go back in time and put a Viking against an Aztec. I don't know. Home ground they both win. Neutral venue, I think it would be depend on the individual. No matter what the race is, there is always a weak link and a strong one.

[HENDO]

They already settled this. Brock Lesnar got destroyed.

[Brickhaus]

I don't know, but obviously Victor Terrazas, the Aztec Viking, destroys all.

[Madmar]

They are both extinct peoples so no one will ever know.

[Madmar]

They already settled this. Brock Lesnar got destroyed.

Lol what? First off Lesner is not a "viking" and that other one certainly isn't an "aztec"

And by your logic, every white boxer or fighter that beats a mexican one means that "vikings" own "aztecs"

You can't just take 1 single person, claim he is a people that no longer exist and then ignore all other incidents that go by your uneducated and ignorant "logic" that have results that you wouldn't of wanted.

Your IQ is quite low.

[HENDO]

Lol what? First off Lesner is not a "viking" and that other one certainly isn't an "aztec"

And by your logic, every white boxer or fighter that beats a mexican one means that "vikings" own "aztecs"

You can't just take 1 single person, claim he is a people that no longer exist and then ignore all other incidents that go by your uneducated and ignorant "logic" that have results that you wouldn't of wanted.

Your IQ is quite low.

It was a joke.

Who's IQ is "quite low" now?

[VanillaKilla]

Vikings are very overrated in battle IMO...

What they should be known for is their excellent navigation,exploration, and assimilation....

Aztecs, well they were a warrior nation apparently.... But not much is known of their history.... 1 big factor is their lack of metal armor or weapons. That is a huge disadvantage.

Imo the best fighters were probably the original Mongols or the original Romans, both of them took over their respective worlds with advanced tactics and a warrior culture. Neither exist anymore though :lol: