PDA

View Full Version : Evander Holyfield vs. Jersey Joe Walcott


Luigi1985
08-20-2007, 07:46 AM
Who wins and why?

fists of fury
08-20-2007, 07:53 AM
I'd say Evander at heavyweight but Walcott at cruiserweight.
I think Walcott would give Evander planty of difficulty because of that sneaky style. Holyfield didn't always look too clever when you boxed him, and I think Walcott would diffuse much of Holyfield's agressiveness.
However, Evander would probably outwork him and outmuscle him at heavyweight.
At cruiserweight, the same sort of fight would unfold, but Holyfield's punches would have less effect on Walcott.

Luigi1985
08-20-2007, 08:00 AM
I'd say Evander at heavyweight but Walcott at cruiserweight.
I think Walcott would give Evander planty of difficulty because of that sneaky style. Holyfield didn't always look too clever when you boxed him, and I think Walcott would diffuse much of Holyfield's agressiveness.
However, Evander would probably outwork him and outmuscle him at heavyweight.
At cruiserweight, the same sort of fight would unfold, but Holyfield's punches would have less effect on Walcott.




:think

Mhmm, but Walcott was never a CW, he was a natural HW, and I donīt understand what you meant, at HW Holyfield didnīt have that much power to KO Walcott, whether at CW Evanderīs power was very good...

fists of fury
08-20-2007, 08:03 AM
:think

Mhmm, but Walcott was never a CW, he was a natural HW, and I donīt understand what you meant, at HW Holyfield didnīt have that much power to KO Walcott, whether at CW Evanderīs power was very good...

Well, Walcott scaled under 200 pounds, which today to me is a cw, but anyways...

It's not that I think Evander overpowers Walcott, it's just that I think his punches would be harder and thus more effective against Walcott. Telling in a long, hard fight.

Luigi1985
08-20-2007, 08:07 AM
Well, Walcott scaled under 200 pounds, which today to me is a cw, but anyways...

It's not that I think Evander overpowers Walcott, it's just that I think his punches would be harder and thus more effective against Walcott. Telling in a long, hard fight.


Ah, OK, I wasnīt sure, but now I know what you mean! :thumbsup

FlatNose
08-20-2007, 08:53 AM
I'm thinking Walcott would be a little too clever for the very predictable Holyfield.If Jersey Joe could put Joe Louis down three times in two fights with tricky counters, he could certainly nail the less polished Holyfield.Evanders relentlessness would work against him in a battle with Walcott, and JJ would TKO Holyfield somewhere around the last three rounds.

robert ungurean
08-20-2007, 09:16 AM
Walcott.
He would simply out box out punch Holy & is too clever to fall into the type of Walcott also hit very hard but I see it as a UD for him. fight Holy would want.

Minotauro
08-20-2007, 10:32 AM
Got to go with Walcott via decision he is awkward and unpredictable plus hard to hit he would probably counter Holyfield who tries to brawl too often and leaves himself exposed.

Ted Stickles
08-20-2007, 05:42 PM
Id go with Walcott.The guy was a master tactician

Luigi1985
08-21-2007, 07:48 AM
Holyfield never looked that good against tricky fighters, Walcott had the power to make Evander respect him and the stamina against Holyfieldīs high pace, I would take Jersey Joe to win a pretty comfortable UD (8-4)...


Walcott UD Holyfield