View Full Version : Joe Louis KO 6 Lee Savold Youtube
SuzieQ49
03-15-2009, 09:19 PM
[Only registered and activated users can see links]
Great Performance by Joe at age 37. I believe Savold was the BBC heavyweight champion, and rated # 2 in the world at the time.
McGrain
03-15-2009, 09:25 PM
Welcome back Suzie.
Bummy Davis
03-15-2009, 09:57 PM
You back and right on it Suzie...good stuff
MRBILL
03-15-2009, 10:03 PM
I just recorded "Louis-Brion" last month on ESPN Classics.... Louis was in-shape, but also old and slow by 1950 / '51.... Joe Louis didn't age gracefully after age 35...... Louis still had presence and power, but no speed or reflexes at all...... Cheers.....
MR.BILL
TheGreatA
03-15-2009, 10:12 PM
Interesting fight between an aging former champion and an aging contender. Both were around 36 years old I believe. Both also went onto to lose their next fight to Rocky Marciano.
Savold was still top ranked at the time as was Louis, the number 1 and the number 2 ranking contenders in the division actually (as rated by the Ring Magazine).
[Only registered and activated users can see links]
Savold was a bloody mess at the end of the fight.
This was the best Louis looked during his comeback. Of course the fact that he was in there against another slowened down old man instead of Rocky Marciano or Ezzard Charles probably made it seem that way. It was the last knockout of Joe Louis' career and one of his more underrated KO's I feel since it's rarely seen anywhere unlike many of his other knockouts.
Marciano Frazier
03-16-2009, 01:55 AM
It looks like a very short, incisive, well-timed left inside Savold's punch that closes the show. All-around, for a guy his age, Joe was in good shape and fighting form.
Good seeing you again, SuzieQ.
mcvey
03-16-2009, 06:26 AM
[Only registered and activated users can see links]
Great Performance by Joe at age 37. I believe Savold was the BBC heavyweight champion, and rated # 2 in the world at the time.
While Louis looked better against Savold than Marciano would do a year later Savold was past it at 35 a tko over Woodcock had briefly ressurrected his career, but he was never a real top liner, in thruth.
Louis in this fight ,showed he could still dominate the third and second raters but he was no longer the "Brown Bomber"
mcvey
03-16-2009, 06:29 AM
Interesting fight between an aging former champion and an aging contender. Both were around 36 years old I believe. Both also went onto to lose their next fight to Rocky Marciano.
Savold was still top ranked at the time as was Louis, the number 1 and the number 2 ranking contenders in the division actually (as rated by the Ring Magazine).
[Only registered and activated users can see links]
Savold was a bloody mess at the end of the fight.
This was the best Louis looked during his comeback. Of course the fact that he was in there against another slowened down old man instead of Rocky Marciano or Ezzard Charles probably made it seem that way. It was the last knockout of Joe Louis' career and one of his more underrated KO's I feel since it's rarely seen anywhere unlike many of his other knockouts.
To put that ranking inperspective ,Joey Maxim was number 3.
SuzieQ49
03-16-2009, 11:59 AM
To put that ranking inperspective ,Joey Maxim was number 3.
Bob Baker and Clarence Henry were # 4 and # 5, and Marciano was around # 10, so I would hardly call the contenders "weak".
mcvey
03-16-2009, 12:10 PM
Bob Baker and Clarence Henry were # 4 and # 5, and Marciano was around # 10, so I would hardly call the contenders "weak".
Savold had lost 38 fights going in to the Louis fight and had been kod 8 times ,the last by Elmer Ray in 2 rds.I didnt call the contenders weak ,I said Savold was never really a top liner ,and I stand by that.
ChrisPontius
03-16-2009, 04:54 PM
Savold had lost 38 fights going in to the Louis fight and had been kod 8 times ,the last by Elmer Ray in 2 rds.I didnt call the contenders weak ,I said Savold was never really a top liner ,and I stand by that.
Savold has a lot of losses on his record, but also has a lot of good wins over contenders. I think he is somewhat underrated.
janitor
03-16-2009, 05:01 PM
The other respectable performance of Louis's comeback was the Beshore fight where he did a somewhat better number on Beshore than Charles did.
While Louis was a shell of his former self during his comeback he was still relative to the other heavyweights in the division one of the best around. Whatever asesment you make of Savold at this stage this was an important fight relative to the heavyweight picture at the time. Perhaps akin to winning an alphabet belt today.
If Ezzard Charles had not lost the title to Walcott it is probable that Louis would have got a second shot at the title though I dont think her had enough left at this point to beat Charles or Walcott for that matter.
TheGreatA
03-16-2009, 06:09 PM
The other respectable performance of Louis's comeback was the Beshore fight where he did a somewhat better number on Beshore than Charles did.
While Louis was a shell of his former self during his comeback he was still relative to the other heavyweights in the division one of the best around. Whatever asesment you make of Savold at this stage this was an important fight relative to the heavyweight picture at the time. Perhaps akin to winning an alphabet belt today.
If Ezzard Charles had not lost the title to Walcott it is probable that Louis would have got a second shot at the title though I dont think her had enough left at this point to beat Charles or Walcott for that matter.
You could make the case that the fight was for an alphabet title since the British Boxing Board of Control recognized Lee Savold as the heavyweight champion after his TKO win over Bruce Woodcock.
Early rounds of Marciano vs Louis:
[Only registered and activated users can see links]
[Only registered and activated users can see links]
MRBILL
01-13-2011, 03:18 AM
One thing is certain, as time went on during Joe Louis' 1950s comeback, he got himself in much better shape than the soft looking 218 he was for Buzzard Charles in 1950...
I have "Louis-Brion 1" rolling and Louis looks fit to me here... Of course he is aged at 36, but still a solid 1950s heavyweight contender all the way...
MR.BILL:deal:thumbsup
vBulletin® v3.8.0, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.