Tito v winky 2000

[TIGEREDGE]

this fight would of been much different IMO. tito was fat and faded in 2005 thats why winky dominated

i fancy tito

[My2Sense]

tito was fat and faded in 2005 thats why winky dominated


It's hard to rest a dominant performance like that entirely on the shoulders of being "fat and faded." A fighter generally doesn't dominate with such ease unless there's a stylistic factor in there as well.

On top of that, Winky wasn't at his peak anymore either. He was showing slight signs of slipping even before he fought Mosley the first time.

IMO Winky takes him anytime.

[rekcutnevets]

Tito has always been vulnerable down the middle, and that is where Winky would always be attacking him.

[EL-MATADOR]

It's hard to rest a dominant performance like that entirely on the shoulders of being "fat and faded." A fighter generally doesn't dominate with such ease unless there's a stylistic factor in there as well.

On top of that, Winky wasn't at his peak anymore either. He was showing slight signs of slipping even before he fought Mosley the first time.

IMO Winky takes him anytime.

Tito is my all time fave but I have to agree with this...Nightmare of a matchup for any version of Tito..

[TIGEREDGE]

don't get me wrong, winkys style is wrong for tito but i still reckon that he could squeeze out a decision against him. vargas and harry simon could