PDA

View Full Version : Most finely tuned boxers of all time...?


Russell
08-26-2007, 01:12 AM
Who were they? Who was the cloest to being more of a machine than a man?

Marciano? Hagler?

JohnThomas1
08-26-2007, 01:16 AM
Sal Sanchez was pretty fine tuned, aggressive counterpuncher that used to get into a fantastic rhythm.

salsanchezfan
08-26-2007, 01:19 AM
Sal Sanchez was pretty fine tuned, aggressive counterpuncher that used to get into a fantastic rhythm.


............And physically, I think Russell's use of the word "machine" is excellent when regarding Sanchez. We've all read here how his breathing and heartrate would return to resting rates in as little as 37 seconds. That's almost like flipping a switch. Unreal.

lillarry
08-26-2007, 01:32 AM
Hagler and Hopkins come to mind

brooklyn1550
08-26-2007, 01:45 AM
Henry Armstrong
Aaron Pryor

Russell
08-26-2007, 02:02 AM
Anyone know what Hopkin's regime is like?

Same goes for Pryor and Armstrong...

JohnThomas1
08-26-2007, 02:07 AM
Pryor was all over the place style wise, i'd hardly call him machine like. Joe Louis also comes to mind here, uber precise and drilled.

Russell
08-26-2007, 02:15 AM
Pryor deserves mention if only for pure endurance, though I really wonder how much of that was drug fueled, knowing Pryror.

JohnThomas1
08-26-2007, 02:21 AM
Pryor deserves mention if only for pure endurance, though I really wonder how much of that was drug fueled, knowing Pryror.

The topics a bit contrasting, "finely tuned" is the header while "more of a machine than a man" sits below. I wasn't thinking finely tuned and endurance went together, but if we're talking endurance Pryor and Armstrong certainly fit. I still wouldn't call Aaron finely tuned, but he can certainly ham it up late in a fight. Sanchez is both, finely tuned and great endurance wise.

Russell
08-26-2007, 02:25 AM
Yeah, I get what you're saying.

I guess I'm just not very picky over what kind of input I get. :)

red cobra
08-26-2007, 05:51 PM
Both Marciano and Hagler were fanatical trainers and this can be made the primary reason that both were the champions that they were.

TBooze
08-26-2007, 06:00 PM
Hagler; it was his biggest weakness as well as a strength.

Hagler was brilliant at following a fight plan; but when the plan was not working perfectly he could not adapt to plan B (AntufermoI/Duran/Leonard). And with Petronelli's in his corner it hardly helped matters...

McGrain
08-26-2007, 08:07 PM
In answer to this question I would pick

Burley
Langford
Greb

I suppose. On they went, regardless.

Vantage_West
08-26-2007, 08:36 PM
Pryor was all over the place style wise, i'd hardly call him machine like.

nah pryor was a good boxer but his conditioning was better than his handspeed and hieght and ring skills so might as well put it to good use and impersonate a windmill.

Vantage_West
08-26-2007, 08:38 PM
carlos zarate anybody always in shape lanky very quick very good conditioning and and destructive one punch power a vey high p4p power rater

Bad_Intentions
08-26-2007, 11:09 PM
hagler.