PDA

View Full Version : A ridiculous Calzaghe article...


kosaros
07-27-2009, 11:44 AM
[Only registered and activated users can see links]’s-no-worthy-challengers-for-him/#more-10366

By Michael Lieberman: In a recent interview with Walesonline, former WBO super middleweight champion Joe Calzaghe sounds bitter as he dishes dirt on Carl Froch and says that there are still no worthy challengers to him. Calzaghe seems to be unaware Americans Andre Dirrell, Andre Ward, as well as Romanian Lucian Bute and German based super middleweight Arthur Abraham.

I hate to break this to Calzaghe, but I’d pick any one of those fighters to make a clean sweep of every opponent that Calzaghe has fought in his career, including Mikkel Kessler. And that’s not because Calzaghe faced a lot of quality fighters during his career, because he faced a whole lot of mediocre opponents.

As for the Super Six tournament that has been put together by Showtime and will be starting in October, Calzaghe said “I see the guys fighting now and I know I could beat them all.” Those are pretty bold words for a guy that struggled to beat a 43-year-old Bernard Hopkins and was knocked down by him as well as 40-year-old Roy Jones Jr.

Calzaghe saves his best comments for World Boxing Council super middleweight champion Carl Froch, saying that there’s no reason to come back because “I’m watching him get beaten up already, so I don’t need to bother.” Calzaghe is talking about Froch’s struggles to beat Jermain Taylor. Froch was getting beaten until the last 30 seconds of the 12th, which is when Froch was able to stop Taylor with only 14 seconds left in the fight.

Froch was fighting a good fighter in Taylor, and there’s no shame in struggling against a fighter like Taylor. After all, Taylor was a champion, you know? I think Taylor would have fought a life and death fight with Calzaghe if he was still around and might have had enough to take Calzaghe.

That’s how good Taylor is. Calzaghe, not satisfied with one comment about Froch, continued to pour it on, saying “He’s in the Super Six now and I don’t even think he will know his name by the time that’s finished. It doesn’t me coming back for that to happen.” It looks like Calzaghe doesn’t see Froch as winning the tournament by the sounds of it. I don’t disagree with him there, because Froch is going to probably struggle to make it out of the first round because he’ll be facing some tough fighters with a good chin.

But, I think Froch would do at least as good a job a Calzaghe would be if he were in the tournament. Both of them would be facing faster opponents like Ward, Dirrell and Taylor, and would have problems to get a win against any of them. I think Froch has the better chance than Calzaghe, because he at least would have a puncher’s chance because of his power.

All Calzaghe would have going for him is his hand speed,. Which wouldn’t be as good as Taylor, Dirrell and Ward. I think deep down, Calzaghe wishes he was in the tournament to see how he’d do, but he probably wouldn’t want to do it because of the risk involved.

It would mean putting his unbeaten record on the line against top quality fighters in the prime of their career rather than fighters on the slide like Hopkins and Jones. There wouldn’t be any soft touches in the tournament like Mario Veit for Calzaghe to feast on and look good against.

I'm not that big of a fan of Calzaghe (ignore my threads/posts in the general), but this article is one of the worst I have ever seen published on a boxing website.

Losfer_Words
07-27-2009, 11:52 AM
Yeah, because Bute shits on JC's resume. Very silly article and stinks of some sort of personal vendetta from the writer's end.

ishy
07-27-2009, 11:55 AM
Most of the articles on boxingnews24 seem to be written by haters or huggers. I think they are all just written by fans. A while back there were a lot of Klit hugging articles on there.

Grant1
07-27-2009, 11:58 AM
That's quality fair play :lol:

ryanm8655
07-27-2009, 12:14 PM
Even if any of the crap in there was true it is appallingly written...reads like a 10 year old has written it.

GazOC
07-27-2009, 12:16 PM
Biased, poorly written crap like that should be a forum post, not an article.

Losfer_Words
07-27-2009, 12:18 PM
I still find the double standards of the Yanks amazing, really. I remember before the JT win Froch was slated on so many forums and by so many American writers and now they love him! I made a thread yesterday to try and understand why they worship Froch more than Haye considering that they are both lippy and, thus far IMO, Haye has proven more on the world stage.

HeavyT
07-27-2009, 12:19 PM
Boxing News 24 is a bunch of biased pricks to be hoenst... there is an occasional good write up. But rarely.

Losfer_Words
07-27-2009, 01:13 PM
The third paragraph of this article looks as if was written by someone cut from the same cloth as the subject of this thread as well:

[Only registered and activated users can see links]

I don't disagree with the thoughts on Arreola's HW resume but it just stinks of a snide dig at Haye.

smjm089
07-27-2009, 01:36 PM
That guy seems to be incredibly bitter about Calzaghe seething with hatred if you will.It certainly was alot more like a forum post of a Calzaghe hater than a genuine unbiased article for a boxing website.

PrideOfWales
07-27-2009, 01:52 PM
If the guy is signed up to the "walesonline" website even this long after Joe has retired then he definately has some bitterness issues of his own!

Hilarious article... good find kos.

Personally though, my all time favourite boxing website article on Calzaghe is here:

[Only registered and activated users can see links]

Also, it's a shame The Ring online wiped out their archives online, Bill Delthoff once penned the following (to paraphrase):

"Sure Calzaghe gave a good performance against Lacy but he tied Lacy up all night to stop him fighting and wouldn't travel for the fight. I'll make some predictions; Calzaghe will never fight the like of Kessler, he'll never get in the ring with Hopkins and he'll never come to the USA to prove himself outside of his comfort zone."

kosaros
07-27-2009, 01:58 PM
If the guy is signed up to the "walesonline" website even this long after Joe has retired then he definately has some bitterness issues of his own!

Hilarious article... good find kos.

Personally though, my all time favourite boxing website article on Calzaghe is here:

[Only registered and activated users can see links]

Also, it's a shame The Ring online wiped out their archives online, Bill Delthoff once penned the following (to paraphrase):

"Sure Calzaghe gave a good performance against Lacy but he tied Lacy up all night to stop him fighting and wouldn't travel for the fight. I'll make some predictions; Calzaghe will never fight the like of Kessler, he'll never get in the ring with Hopkins and he'll never come to the USA to prove himself outside of his comfort zone."

"Calzaghe will fight with the heart of a true champion, but it will not be enough to stop Lacy, who hits as hard as Tyson and is as fast as "Pretty Boy" Floyd. Lacy by KO in six"

:rofl:rofl:rofl

PrideOfWales
07-27-2009, 02:17 PM
More here:

[Only registered and activated users can see links] oxi ngsce ne.com/?m=show&id=3266

digregorio1.
07-27-2009, 02:19 PM
i used to visit boxingnews24 often before i found esb and you will notice that every single one of michael liebermann's articles are anti-british and mostly anti-calzaghe, and they are so ridiculous at times that i'm sure they are wind ups

'Ben'
07-27-2009, 02:29 PM
Not Michael Lieberman!!! For fuck sake!!!

I never read his shit the worst journalist alive!.... apart from maybe Manuel Parez who hates all fighters that beat Mexicans!!!

Boxingnews 24.... the worst boxing website of all time.:-(

El Cepillo
07-27-2009, 07:29 PM
Liberman is a joke, but thats not his worst article by any stretch of the imagination.

'Ben'
07-27-2009, 07:32 PM
Liberman is a joke, but thats not his worst article by any stretch of the imagination.


Oh yeah.

Parez is pretty bad too though.