View Full Version : Marcel Cerdan vs. Bernhard Hopkins
Luigi1985
09-11-2007, 06:29 PM
Who wins at 160 lbs and why?
bumdujour
09-11-2007, 07:56 PM
i saw some of cerdans fights and he sure is a powerfull guy. but skillwise, hopkins was way better.
and hopkins was also way taller, with cerdan only being 5´8......short for a middleweight.
cerdan would pressure him and land some good stuff, but hopkins wiskers were made of stern stuff.
he´d simply use his hight and jab and box box box....all the way to a clear UD.
by the way, nice avatar. always had a thing for rosi.
McGrain
09-11-2007, 07:57 PM
Cerdan is to short and, for Hopkins, would be easy to hit.
Stoppage on accumalation of punishment in a good but one-sided fight.
brooklyn1550
09-11-2007, 08:30 PM
Hopkins by decision
His size, footwork, defense, and counter punching would see him through to a clear victory
redrooster
09-12-2007, 03:01 AM
Cerdan was on another level. much more tenacious, better puncher, all of that. Take my word for it, Cerdan wins easy decision.
Holmes' Jab
09-12-2007, 04:18 AM
Hopkins, close but clear UD.
mike4819
09-12-2007, 06:28 PM
If anyone wants to see Cerdan, I think the Zale fight is on you tube.
vBulletin® v3.8.0, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.