View Full Version : rahman-tua II .......was tua knocked down?
Vantage_West
08-20-2009, 01:03 AM
:think:huh:blood
My2Sense
08-20-2009, 01:15 AM
If I remember right, the bell rang about a split second before he was floored.
But if the bell hadn't rung, it should've been scored a KD IMO.
Hydraulix
08-20-2009, 01:16 AM
Yeah...the punch came after the bell. So I don't count it as a knockdown. Tua didn't see it coming.
TheGreatA
08-20-2009, 08:43 AM
Tua himself was still throwing punches. It was a legit knockdown otherwise but due to it being after the bell, it shouldn't be counted, much like Starling-Molinares.
[Only registered and activated users can see links]
Robbi
08-20-2009, 08:51 AM
No wonder he went down. His feet were totally square on and in a straight line. Hagler and LaMotta would both have went down in the exact same situation.
klompton
08-20-2009, 09:17 AM
Yes it was a legit knockdown but shouldnt be scored because it was after the bell.
Russell
08-20-2009, 06:52 PM
Sure was.
Rahman had ridiculous power. Compare the shots he took from Shannon Briggs, Vitali Klitschko, Frank Bruno and others to the right hand that put him down like he had been shot from Rahman.
Marion Wilson actually said Rahman or Shannon Briggs were the hardest hitters he ever faced.
punchy
08-20-2009, 11:17 PM
This is different to the shot Rahman took from Tua after the bell where he was really hurt, Tua doesn't look hurt and its true his feet are together so no wonder he went down, looks like they evened up and any knockdown after the bell doesn't count in my book.
Rumsfeld
08-20-2009, 11:22 PM
Not a knockdown.
Rahman was (IMO) robbed in that fight.
klompton
08-20-2009, 11:37 PM
Rahman was robbed in both fights
fists of fury
08-21-2009, 02:53 AM
Not an official knockdown, but a knockdown.
vBulletin® v3.8.0, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.