View Full Version : Andy Lee > John Duddy?
Butch Coolidge
06-24-2007, 12:19 PM
Duddy is further along in his professional career and I've barely seen Andy Lee but something tells me Lee is more likely to go all the way to a championship belt and keep it for a while. Lee is both clever and hardpunching that makes it really tough to fight against him.
Arthur
06-24-2007, 12:30 PM
Agreed. I am a big Duddy fan but he doesn't seem to be particulary skilled to me. Andy Lee on the other hand looks to be a champion in the making. Emanual Steward is really keen on him.
LennoxGOAT
06-24-2007, 12:37 PM
I think Lee shows much better skills. Combined with better coaching and Lee should be a legit, longtime champ.
brooklyn1550
06-24-2007, 01:28 PM
Lee has more potential - he is more skilled and is trained by one of the best
achillesthegreat
06-24-2007, 01:29 PM
In a few fights I'll choose Lee over Duddy. Duddy has valuable experience now. He's been in some long fights and a war.
Club Fighter
06-24-2007, 01:45 PM
Over a year ago I made a thread regarding James Moore. It got no responses. Mark my words, he's a tough kid and will make a name for himself from 154-160. He's got all the tools and a strong amateur background, no disrespect to John Duddy or Andy Lee.
Mrboogie23
06-24-2007, 02:28 PM
Over a year ago I made a thread regarding James Moore. It got no responses. Mark my words, he's a tough kid and will make a name for himself from 154-160. He's got all the tools and a strong amateur background, no disrespect to John Duddy or Andy Lee.
Not sure what that has to do with andy lee being a better prospect then duddy but right on.
:good
In response to the thread, I'd say Lee appears to be more skilled. I expect him to accomplish more then Duddy.
Andy Lee will appear on the undercard of Klitschko vs Brewster.His opponent has not been anounced yet.
vBulletin® v3.8.0, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.