View Full Version : The comparisons between Hatton/PBF and Gatti/PBF
Will people who constantly say "This will be like Gatti/Mayweather was" please shut the fuck up?
1. Hatton right now is better than Gatti ever was.
2. Hatton is without doubt 10x better than Gatti was when he fought Mayweather. Wars with Robinson, De La Hoya, Ward and many more. Not only did PBF not beat a great fighter, he beat a "good" fighter who was shot!
Comparing Hatton, the undefeated, lineal 140lbs champion, to a guy who was never that good and effectively finished by the time he fought Mayweather is just ridiculous.
It should be a bannable offence. If ESB bans racists, as they're ignorant, there is nothing more ignorant in boxing, than a comparison Hatton to Gatti :good :D
There is no comparison,period.
KayEpps
09-18-2007, 10:37 AM
Good point. Hatton has never lost a fight and made Tyszu quit on his stool. Tsyzu would have beat the shit out of Gatti and ripped him to pieces. Whatever supposed shortcomings Hatton has, he is far above Gatti and always will be
Hatton lost to Collazo - if you watched the fight. Just like most can make a case for Castillo's first fight against Mayweather.
If you took anything from the Collazo fight is that as good as Hatton is - he had a lot of problems dealing with Collazo's speed. Well - Mayweather is way faster and more skilled than Collazo.
However - I do agree with the Thread Statement. Stop comparing Hatton to Gatti. If the fight turns out to be similar or worst - that's when you talk your shit.
jopez707
09-18-2007, 10:44 AM
Hatton lost to Collazo - if you watched the fight. Just like most can make a case for Castillo's first fight against Mayweather.
If you took anything from the Collazo fight is that as good as Hatton is - he had a lot of problems dealing with Collazo's speed. Well - Mayweather is way faster and more skilled than Collazo.
However - I do agree with the Thread Statement. Stop comparing Hatton to Gatti. If the fight turns out to be similar or worst - that's when you talk your shit.
I think that fight will be a better comparison. Collazo made Hatton look pretty bad in there, and Mayweather has even better skillz, ring generalship and speed that Collazo. I see Mayweather winning somehting like 8-4, or 9-3, maybe even stopping HAtton late on cuts. It will not be Gatti-Mayweather though, Hatton is much better than that.
Fab2333
09-18-2007, 11:04 AM
People are comparing the fight b/c that is exactly what it is shaping up 2 b.
Hatton had trouble handling Colazzo speed. Floyd is way faster than Colazzo and more skilled. Hatton got hit a lot by a slower colazzo, and many people thought that Hatton lost the fight. SO what do you think will happen when he gets in there at a weight he struggled fighting at for one, 2 Floyd is faster than Colazzo, 3 he is a smarter fighter, 4 way better defensively. Hatton really has no advantage in this fight IMO. He will have to just work his ass off in the ring and try 2 make it look close, but thats easier said than done.
THat is the reason why people compare the fight, and quite frankly I dont blame them, b/c I myself think that Floyd is gon woop Hatton ass somethin serious
brooklyn1550
09-18-2007, 11:09 AM
Big Mayweather fans point to the fight with Gatti
Big Hatton fans point to Sugar Ray Leonard v. Roberto Duran 1
I don't think it will be like either of those fights.
Conan
09-18-2007, 11:10 AM
Collazo didn't give Hatton a hard time with his speed. He gave him a hard time with his height and reach advantage. Collazo is over 5'10 and Hatton is 5'6 or 5'7. Mayweather's face is going to be alot easier to reach. And I suspect Hatton to set him up with a nasty body shot like he did Castillo
Collazo didn't give Hatton a hard time with his speed. He gave him a hard time with his height and reach advantage. Collazo is over 5'10 and Hatton is 5'6 or 5'7. Mayweather's face is going to be alot easier to reach. And I suspect Hatton to set him up with a nasty body shot like he did CastilloAnother thing floyd isn't a southpaw.
KayEpps
09-18-2007, 11:31 AM
Collazo didn't give Hatton a hard time with his speed. He gave him a hard time with his height and reach advantage. Collazo is over 5'10 and Hatton is 5'6 or 5'7. Mayweather's face is going to be alot easier to reach. And I suspect Hatton to set him up with a nasty body shot like he did Castillo
I'm not a big Mayweather fan - but please explain to me when Mayweather face has ever been easy to hit?
Ambition_Def
09-18-2007, 11:33 AM
Another thing floyd isn't a southpaw.
Exactly.
An orthodox boxer facing a southpaw is the hardest matchup for a guy who fights off the chest (smothers). You cannot fully smother the southpaw left because your shoulder is grinding into his, so he always has room. Watch the Magee fight, same deal.
Collazo has some speed but there was a great advantage there for him.
Thread Stealer
09-18-2007, 11:38 AM
The Hatton comparisons are way off.
I guess since Hatton and Gatti are both tough white guys who bleed quite a bit there's a tendency to compare the two.
Stylistically, among PBF's previous opponents, Hatton is more like a Jesus Chavez or Jose Luis Castillo.
Hatton gets in your face and applies pressure.
Gatti liked to trade and exchange but liked to have more room. He didn't swarm and apply pressure like Hatton.
Collazo was a strange fight, and a terrible performance, but there are reasons behind it. He was supposed to be fighting Lazcano at 140lbs 7 weeks before the fight. Lazcano is much more suited to Hatton than Collazo is because of his style and stance. Then you have all the legal problems Hatton had before this fight.
He didn't have time to prepare properly and it showed on the night.
KayEpps
09-18-2007, 12:19 PM
Who said his face was going to get hit anyway? Mayweather's always soaked body shots but he's not come up against anyone like Ricky who can really give to the body hard.
Are you telling me that a young Castillo didn't work the body as well as Ricky does? If so - you need to cancel your ESB membership - cause you have no idea what you're talking about.
And the Kid "Conan" was the one that said "Mayweather's face was within reaching distance for Ricky." They call him Pretty Boy for a reason.
KhanB
09-18-2007, 12:31 PM
I think Hatton has a more legitimate chance and Gatti just ended up being a Great White Hype fighter that people wanted to win but didnt have a shot.
Guru_Too_You
09-18-2007, 12:40 PM
Collazo was a strange fight, and a terrible performance, but there are reasons behind it. He was supposed to be fighting Lazcano at 140lbs 7 weeks before the fight. Lazcano is much more suited to Hatton than Collazo is because of his style and stance. Then you have all the legal problems Hatton had before this fight.
He didn't have time to prepare properly and it showed on the night.
But he was already training. Collazo didnt even know he was fighting. They had the same amount of time to prepare for one another, but Ricky had a head start.
To say that that was detrimental to him and accounts for his performance is what do you say, bollocks? It was an advantage Jack.
But he was already training. Collazo didnt even know he was fighting. They had the same amount of time to prepare for one another, but Ricky had a head start.
To say that that was detrimental to him and accounts for his performance is what do you say, bollocks? It was an advantage Jack.
He had seven weeks to carry on cutting down on his usual fat, which is never an issue, but he had no time to put 7lbs of muscle on. Without steroids most people would struggle to put a lb of solid muscle on in a week. Hatton had to do that whilst cutting a load of weight.
At least Collazo was fighting at his natural weight. Hatton wasn't. If both men were fighitng at 147lbs, then yes, Hatton would have an advantage but he was used to fighting at 140lbs and didn't have enough time to add muscle.
Hatton was noticably less ripped than he was at 140lbs and had a lot of stamina issues, despite throwing less punches. Had he had time to gain that 7lbs properly, neither would have been an issue.
vBulletin® v3.8.0, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.