Jermaine "Bad Intentions" Taylor... [Archive]

Amsterdam

09-19-2007, 03:17 AM

No, he doesn't, he's a disgrace and there is no need to even go over the facts anymore because Pavlik is going to annihilate him and answer all of the questions for those who failed to see the evidence that was blatantly in their faces.

What he does fight like however is a guy who can't deal with pressure, a guy who cannot evolve and a guy who cannot comprehend what a world class trainer giving good advice is screaming at him, due to his total lack of anything resembling the average man's intellect.

But let's glorify the disgrace and skip into the sunset content with THIS as the set undisputed MW champion, I'm syked.

KhanB

09-19-2007, 03:19 AM

I dont care if Pavlik loses his next fight after beating milk dud Taylor. Just take the belts away from JT and bring balance back to the universe.

Amsterdam

09-19-2007, 03:20 AM

I dont care if Pavlik loses his next fight after beating milk dud Taylor. Just take the belts away from JT and bring balance back to the universe.

I agree, it's not like Pavlik is anything more than a solid B level fighter anyway. But I'd rather the belts go to a solid guy who's going to give it all and is also a good representative of the sport than a piece of shit who cannot even speak correctly.

Amsterdam

09-19-2007, 03:33 AM

I have come on this thread enough and explained Taylor to all of his critics and I am finished with that. If you are so sure let's do this, I will bet you that Taylor wins this fight. And the bet will be that the loser can never come to this forum again. We will have the Mods monitor the IP Address but one of us will be banned. Will you take the bet? It's time to start holding people accountable for their comments

You're too late, I already have bets running. Besides, all it takes is an injury and the fight is over and not from my picks favour, an injury can happen even if I am right and Taylor is getting destroyed, so taking a permanent ban bet on any bout would be stupid just for the 10% injury ratio.

However my ignorant Taylor apologising friend, if Pavlik is not successful in removing Taylor, then I will be gone for 7 months total due to the bets I have made.

Amsterdam

09-19-2007, 03:50 AM

Well my friend you may be a dumb SOB but you are not a liar in any means, that's an honest post. Hopkins 1 and 2 and Winky were razor thin fights that all had razon thin outcomes, it was not like a De La Hoya fight wear he lost and won on the scorecards by four rounds ( Whitaker, Quartey,:deal )

Hopkins and Wright are A level elite's, but not hard hitting pressure fighters. Do you know what style fucks Taylor up?

Pressure.

Good luck.

psychopath

09-19-2007, 03:52 AM

Does he really have bad intentions when fighting? I don't see it... :think

Well . . . you're probably being blinded by your hatred too, just like some desperate people here. :yep

I'm certain that all the fighters that climbs the ring have serious bad intentions towards their opponents :D though not everybody is sucesfull in putting it into play.

If you're thinking that Taylor goes up the ring without the intention of hurting his opponent then something must be terribly wrong with you.

Check your psychiatrist buddy while it's not too late. :rofl

Lance_Uppercut

09-19-2007, 03:54 AM

Hopkins and Wright are A level elite's, but not hard hitting pressure fighters. Do you know what style fucks Taylor up?

Pressure.

Good luck.

And you base that off ONE fight where he won all but maybe two rounds? Seeing as Calzaghe's a type of pressure fighter, it's no wonder you're selling it. You and Saran wrap...:patsch

psychopath

09-19-2007, 04:01 AM

Hopkins and Wright are A level elite's, but not hard hitting pressure fighters. Do you know what style fucks Taylor up?

Pressure.

Good luck.
Pressure fucks Taylor up? Oh YEAH? How come he's still undefeated. :D

This is what happens to fighters who comes in to give Taylor pressure, look at this carefully :yep

[Only registered and activated users can see links]

:happy:happy:happy:happy:happy:happy:happy:happy:happy:happy:happy:happy:happy:happy:happy:happy

RAMPAGE0017

09-19-2007, 04:05 AM

Pressure fucks Taylor up? Oh YEAH? How come he's still undefeated. :D

This is what happens to fighters who comes in to give Taylor pressure, look at this carefully :yep

[Only registered and activated users can see links]

:happy:happy:happy:happy:happy:happy:happy:happy:happy:happy:happy:happy:happy:happy:happy:happy

What's sad is.. that punch that he connected with on Spinks actually looked like it was pretty hard, and yet Spinks still managed to not only go the distance, but possibly WIN the fight, as well.

psychopath

09-19-2007, 04:11 AM

What's sad is.. that punch that he connected with on Spinks actually looked like it was pretty hard, and yet Spinks still managed to not only go the distance, but possibly WIN the fight, as well.
Yeah "looks" and "possibly" :D:lol: . . . unfortunately that's just your insinuation. The fact is that's just a glancing blow because Spinks is on the move all the time "AND" spinks actually loss. :yep:good . . . so it's not really that sad it's just in your head.

RAMPAGE0017

09-19-2007, 04:16 AM

Yeah "looks" and "possibly" :D:lol: . . . unfortunately that's just your insinuation. The fact is that's just a glancing blow because Spinks is on the move all the time "AND" spinks actually loss. :yep:good . . . so it's not really that sad it's just in your head.

Oh, you mean we're not playing make-believe? If that's the case, I guess we can cancel out your above attempt to display that Taylor can handle pressure, seeing as how the 3 photos you posted weren't even of fighters who in certain cases can't even maintain HALF the pressure which Pavlik can.

psychopath

09-19-2007, 04:28 AM

Oh, you mean we're not playing make-believe? If that's the case, I guess we can cancel out your above attempt to display that Taylor can handle pressure, seeing as how the 3 photos you posted weren't even of fighters who in certain cases can't even maintain HALF the pressure which Pavlik can.
Nah . . . you cancel your further attempt to degrade Taylor. That's what it is. :D:lol:

Yeah Pavlik is the master of pressure . . . if that's the way you want to put it. :yep Let's just see what happens comes fight time.

Problem is . . . you people can't wait for the real thing . . . and you can't keep your mouth shuts . . . as if you knew exactly what's going to happen.

I have been defending Taylor buddy . . . but I have never tried to pull down nor insult Pavlik. :hey:lol:

RAMPAGE0017

09-19-2007, 04:37 AM

Nah . . . you cancel your further attempt to degrade Taylor. That's what it is. :D:lol:

Yeah Pavlik is the master of pressure . . . if that's the way you want to put it. :yep Let's just see what happens comes fight time.

Problem is . . . you people can't wait for the real thing . . . and you can't keep your mouth shuts . . . as if you knew exactly what's going to happen.

I have been defending Taylor buddy . . . but I have never tried to pull down nor insult Pavlik. :hey:lol:

Degrade him? What have I said about him that isn't true?

psychopath

09-19-2007, 04:47 AM

Degrade him? What have I said about him that isn't true?

I didn't say that you said anything that isn't true. What I'm saying is . . . you feel Taylor will crumble under Pav's pressure because the fighters in the photos is not even half of Pav's pressure? Let's wait for the actual fight and see. Clear? :D :yep

Shake

09-19-2007, 11:17 AM

Perhaps he intends to stink the place up.

JETSKI

09-19-2007, 11:28 AM

And you base that off ONE fight where he won all but maybe two rounds? Seeing as Calzaghe's a type of pressure fighter, it's no wonder you're selling it. You and Saran wrap...:patsch

No, he's no basing it on one fight with Miranda. He (and I) but apparently not you, know that Pavlik always comes forward & pressures his opponents to back up & with his workrate & when he chooses to send in the bomb, its no wonder his record is 31-0 with...

28 KO's!!!

a 90% KO percentage.:yep

DamonD

09-19-2007, 11:30 AM

KO percentages aren't everything, of course...just ask Oganov ;)

JETSKI

09-19-2007, 11:30 AM

Pressure fucks Taylor up? Oh YEAH? How come he's still undefeated. :D

This is what happens to fighters who comes in to give Taylor pressure, look at this carefully :yep

[Only registered and activated users can see links]

:happy:happy:happy:happy:happy:happy:happy:happy:happy:happy:happy:happy:happy:happy:happy:happy

I don't see anybody going down in those photo's.:tong

BIGTIMETIMMY

09-19-2007, 11:44 AM

I think taylor will be agressive early and be up on the cards until getting fatigued and a tko stoppage in the 8th or 9th for pavlik

Brickhaus

09-19-2007, 11:50 AM

Hopkins and Wright are A level elite's, but not hard hitting pressure fighters. Do you know what style fucks Taylor up?

Pressure.

Good luck.

He handled Ouma's pressure just fine, and he turned Marquez into a bloody pulp. Any fighter that has tried pressure tactics with Taylor has failed miserably.

Zakman

09-19-2007, 12:02 PM

Does he really have bad intentions when fighting? I don't see it... :think

Hell no. Why should he? He's got the HBO suits behind him. All he has to do is show up, remain standing through the final bell and everything's all set!

A better nickname for him would be:

Jermain "Gift Decision" Taylor!:yep

The Kurgan

09-19-2007, 12:07 PM

He has no intentions whatsoever except not getting hurt; for a boxer, that's pretty bad intention-wise, especially as far as the fans are concerned.

So yes, "Bad Intentions" is a fitting name for Jermain.

Lacyace

09-19-2007, 02:33 PM

No, he doesn't, he's a disgrace....

:-(

Brickhaus

09-19-2007, 03:12 PM

Ouma is tiny, 5'8" natural 154 pounder. And Marquez was also a natural jr.middleweight.

I still don't see the evidence pointing to Taylor being bad at handling pressure fighters. Best I can tell, he slacks off when fighters don't bring pressure, and he's more active and has more counterpunching opportunities when an opponent presses.

I just want someone to point out the fight where Taylor couldn't handle pressure. Ouma is not a good answer - he handled that fine and coasted to a decision. Ouma's punches didn't hurt him, so he didn't do much to waste energy avoiding them. Yes, Ouma was small, but it still doesn't provide evidence that he can't handle pressure.

brooklyn1550

09-19-2007, 03:35 PM

Not to the degree of a Cotto, Pacquiao, or Hatton. It's a good nickname regardless.

Thor

09-19-2007, 03:58 PM

Damn Psychopath, I almost didn't notice that ESPN type scroller thing you got. I need one for my avatar bet with Zakman.:think

Ramshall1

09-19-2007, 04:52 PM

you guys are givin him too much grief for his one fight with Spinks.

Zakman

09-19-2007, 05:18 PM

you guys are givin him too much grief for his one fight with Spinks.
It's not just Spinks, it's EVERY fight since HBO appropriated Hopkins' title for their poster boy!!!!:patsch

Jinx

09-19-2007, 05:28 PM

Taylor should have 2 losses on his record already...but that being said he still will beat Pavlik...his athleticism and quicker hands will do the job, and he's gained the experience from Hops and Wink...Pavlik's a good fighter, strong puncher but i don't he can do much with Taylor because of the speed difference...and Taylor hits hard, not a one-punch guy but he can hurt anyone at 168 and below...Pavlik is in for it...

Ramshall1

09-19-2007, 05:38 PM

It's not just Spinks, it's EVERY fight since HBO appropriated Hopkins' title for their poster boy!!!!:patsch

come on now, Hops is the one who made those two fights boring as hell . . .you cant blame JT for that.

ANd as for the decision, coulda gone either way . . . too pretend they were robberies is just absurd.

Lance_Uppercut

09-19-2007, 09:20 PM

No, he's no basing it on one fight with Miranda. He (and I) but apparently not you, know that Pavlik always comes forward & pressures his opponents to back up & with his workrate & when he chooses to send in the bomb, its no wonder his record is 31-0 with...

28 KO's!!!

a 90% KO percentage.:yep

OK.....and he's using the Pavlik v Miranda fight to prove Taylor doesn't like pressure fighters? :huh Perhaps you missed what I replied to.

box03

09-19-2007, 10:48 PM

I dont know why everyone hates Taylor so bad, for one he ducks nobody as you could see by his resume. He has thought 4 close matches with some elite fighters of this era and has won 3 and one of which was a draw, in all 4 fights he was the agressor. The man is obviously talented and wether he beats Pavlik or not they cant take away the fact he was the only man to beat B-hop twice, and thats accomplishment in itself.

Scar

09-19-2007, 11:22 PM

Last 2 fights were terrible, if that's the style he plans to use from now on then he loses his next fight 100%. The Jermain Taylor from the Winky fight and before fought with Bad Intentions and desire.

tays001

09-19-2007, 11:53 PM

Toopretty

09-20-2007, 01:37 AM

Taylor is not shit...god damn it..he was a decent middle champ..Crazy Amsterdam is right though..taylor goes into a shell and becomes kind of like a punching bag when he is smothered. Pavlik has everything to beat Taylor. If he does not take him out of there I will be surprised. But Taylor is still a good fighter regardless.

Lance_Uppercut

09-20-2007, 02:19 AM

If Taylor is crap that means Hopkins and Winky are crap. That means Tarver is crap as well as Jones and Johnson. I guess Shane is crap since he lost to Winky. Same for DLH...crap. Idiots...

Amsterdam

09-20-2007, 05:17 AM

If Taylor is crap that means Hopkins and Winky are crap. That means Tarver is crap as well as Jones and Johnson. I guess Shane is crap since he lost to Winky. Same for DLH...crap. Idiots...

You may very well be onto something pretty ground breaking mate with this post.

However, Shane with his size disadvantage is more than forgiven, in fact, 'resume points' for making it close the 2nd time around. Johnson is a B level fighter, always has been. Tarver is absolutely an overrated fighter and Jones at that point was no longer Roy Jones Jr.

Hopkins is definitley not crap, just old at 40+.