Who will make the most succesful defences of their title?

[El Cepillo]

Khan's at 140 with his WBA title.

Haye at HW with his WBA title.

Froch at 168 with his WBC title.


I personally think Haye is a better fighter than Khan. But Haye has probably got 1 more defence and then is a distinct underdog going in against a Klitschko.

140 is a good division, lots of young, well matched guys, but even the best guy(s) in the division is a long way short of a great fighter.

Froch is by far the weakest champion of this lot, an accident waiting to happen, but he already has 2 defences.

Thoughts?

[ScouseLad]

The Frank ****** fighter.

[Dan684]

:lol:

[mike464]

Khan of course. ****** probably has 10 Salita type fights lined up for him. Haye and Froch go after the best and will have to lose at some point.

[Lee Mc]

Haye is the best of the 3 but can't beat any Klitschko.

Froch has been slightly exposed by Dirrell as someone who can be outboxed and I think he loses to Kessler and, for the record although he has a completely different style, Abraham.

Khan will have the most defences although I don't think that will be more than 5 or 6.

[Losfer_Words]

I voted Khan simply because we all know that Haye doesn't intend on being around for much more than 2 years.

[PrideOfWales]

Frank ****** will guide his charge expertly through fields of danger like an elusive gazelle bounding through a field of lions.

Mick Hennessey will allow Carl Froch - armed with only a bayonet - to go into battle in an era when war is fought with guns.

David Haye is probably the world's smartest dumbass.