View Full Version : Dana White Trashes Jake Rossen
snakerattle79
12-29-2009, 12:44 PM
after Loretta Hunt it's now Jake Rossen
[Only registered and activated users can see links]
Dana is the King of douchebags, I think its funny he is calling someone else a douchebag haha. I can't wait 'til this asshole disappears forever. What does he have against Mazzagotti now?
TKDfighterJoe
12-29-2009, 03:47 PM
he doesn't seem as cool as he is trying to be when you take into account he is saying it all for the camera.
300press
12-29-2009, 07:55 PM
:patsch
It's sad that he probably set up the camera himself. This guy is hurting the sport bigtime.
Beebs
12-29-2009, 07:58 PM
Dana is the King of douchebags, I think its funny he is calling someone else a douchebag haha. I can't wait 'til this asshole disappears forever. What does he have against Mazzagotti now?
He's got a pretty legitimate beef there, Mazzagotti has been late on a disproportionate number of stoppages; he is going to get somebody hurt.
Every other thing out of Dana White's mouth is some sort of insult.
Seems like one of those guys who takes outspokeness to the level of a talkshow host.. It's Jerry Springeresque, and has been ever since his oddball challenge against Tito. I'm pretty sure people wouldn't mind watching him try to box with Tito.
achillesthegreat
12-29-2009, 08:28 PM
I'm not a huge White fan or anything but I think people are forgetting he started off as a fan, did as much for MMA as anyone, is incredibly passionate but has a good and bad side. He's not an angel but alot of people make him out to be the devil himself.
I'm not a huge White fan or anything but I think people are forgetting he started off as a fan, did as much for MMA as anyone, is incredibly passionate but has a good and bad side. He's not an angel but alot of people make him out to be the devil himself.
Nobody forces him to go out and talk shit all the time. The guy seems to just have that sort of, "Ugly American" character. The guy has some interesting things to say, he puts on some great shows, and most of the time I agree with what he has to say about the outcome of fights, his own fighters, etc. He has very high standards for his own people, and that is a great thing about him..
But, the terrible thing about him is that he puts himself at odds with things he doesn't have to. He's one of those types of people who has a need for enemies, arrogant, and absolutely thoughtless at times. The shit he's talked about Couture, Tito, Rampage, Barnett, and Fedor is just idiotic.
He was a great usher of MMA to the United States. Nobody can take that away from him. But when it comes right down to it, he's a pos 50% of the time.
He only does it for money, don't get that confused with loving MMA.
He only does it for money, don't get that confused with loving MMA.
I would have disagreed with this a year ago.. But, we have Kimbo on T.V.. Roegan handing out with the Hulkster, and the release of Dan Henderson..
Dan Henderson.. Was he really asking too much? I mean seriously. Who in their right mind lets Dan Henderson go?
dublynflya
12-30-2009, 05:21 AM
Nobody forces him to go out and talk shit all the time. The guy seems to just have that sort of, "Ugly American" character. The guy has some interesting things to say, he puts on some great shows, and most of the time I agree with what he has to say about the outcome of fights, his own fighters, etc. He has very high standards for his own people, and that is a great thing about him..
But, the terrible thing about him is that he puts himself at odds with things he doesn't have to. He's one of those types of people who has a need for enemies, arrogant, and absolutely thoughtless at times. The shit he's talked about Couture, Tito, Rampage, Barnett, and Fedor is just idiotic.
He was a great usher of MMA to the United States. Nobody can take that away from him. But when it comes right down to it, he's a pos 50% of the time.
:good A fair analysis! I'll be honest with you guys it is only since i've been an ESB member that I have realised just how much he is disliked! I had read some of his "Comments" prior to becoming a member on here, but I just attributed most those to be the passionate words of a fan! The fact is that he has been good for mma but I guess his comments do sometimes make him very difficult to like!!
theHawtness
12-30-2009, 07:10 AM
"the position for douchebag promoter who thinks he's tough because he hangs out with fighters and insults fighters has already been filled."
i believe an MMA figter said this. haha. so true.
achillesthegreat
12-30-2009, 07:24 AM
Nobody forces him to go out and talk shit all the time. The guy seems to just have that sort of, "Ugly American" character. The guy has some interesting things to say, he puts on some great shows, and most of the time I agree with what he has to say about the outcome of fights, his own fighters, etc. He has very high standards for his own people, and that is a great thing about him..
But, the terrible thing about him is that he puts himself at odds with things he doesn't have to. He's one of those types of people who has a need for enemies, arrogant, and absolutely thoughtless at times. The shit he's talked about Couture, Tito, Rampage, Barnett, and Fedor is just idiotic.
He was a great usher of MMA to the United States. Nobody can take that away from him. But when it comes right down to it, he's a pos 50% of the time.
That is his tell it like it is attitude. He is relatively transparent. He is always talking about all the hot issues in details. I'm not saying I always agree with him i.e. Fedor isn't the best heavyweight.
I do agree that he is abrasive, seems to need enemies, puts himself at odds with people etc Don King etc get bad articles written about them all the time, they don't make blogs with them going crazy, they just take it in their stride.
However I think that is the passion and tell it like it is character coming through. It is a double edged sword. On one side he tells it like it is, exposes boxing, tells us what is going on but on the other side he feels compelled to be at war, be abrasive etc
Sometimes White takes it too far and he'll piss me off but by and large I accept he has his good and bad points BUT doesn't appear to be the devil.
thejokerswild
12-30-2009, 07:52 AM
This is what we get instead of pride.
Boinko
12-30-2009, 10:43 AM
It's also amusing that at least once per season White goes on a tirade against the TUF guys about how he doesn't want the UFC to be viewed in a negative light by the fighters acting inappropriately. i.e. getting into fights inside the house.
Yet White, who is the public face of the UFC, comes across as a pathetic, low-brow fool most of the time.
This is what we get instead of pride.
And there are aspects of the UFC that are better than Pride.. I tend to like the more international feeling of Pride, though it was clearly Japanese, it appealed to MMA fans.
As my taste in MMA has matured, I think no weight class competitions were outright stupid, freakshow matches at the time were okay, but they aren't needed anymore. I think the freakshow matches are Japans sort of version of having the Hulkster hang out with Joe Roegan, a way to appeal to the masses... Genki Sudo vs. Bob Sapp sort of fights are not needed, MMA has evolved past that b.s.
but I can see the validity of a Grand Prix if they are like two one minute rounds in pride rules/no elbows..
I still not sold on cage vs ring, and prefer neither, as both cage and ring can be used as a sort of weapon in a fight..
I feel soccer kicks and knees to the head of a charging opponent should be allowed as in pride.. If you have a great shot as a wrestler or bjj player, part of the risk is getting blown away for putting your head down low in such a vulnerable position and using poor timing.
For elbows, I say allow them all or disallow them all... None of this north south bullshit.. Elbows are going to cause nasty cuts, and are going to break eye sockets regardless of where they are thrown from..
Best of both worlds would be nice.. Best of Pride along with best of UFC would be a dream come true.
thejokerswild
12-30-2009, 11:59 AM
All good points there. I was more relating to the obvious immaturity and unprofressionalism of it all.
I don't want to bring up a ufc v pride argument (done and finished) but seeing this brings back memories of the way things were done better. That and I have personal hate for dana white.
300press
12-30-2009, 03:43 PM
He only does it for money, don't get that confused with loving MMA.
:good
vBulletin® v3.8.0, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.