View Full Version : Billy Conn vs. Tim Witherspoon
The Conn that fought Joe Louis I vs. the Witherspoon that was in-shape and prime.
Unforgiven
03-10-2010, 03:42 AM
Billy Conn, by decision.
Mendoza
03-10-2010, 05:52 AM
Billy Conn, by decision.
Based on what? Conn was a weak hitter, and never faced a man of Witherpsoon's size who could jab, and also had defense, and power.
Unforgiven
03-10-2010, 05:57 AM
Based on what? Conn was a weak hitter, and never faced a man of Witherpsoon's size who could jab, and also had defense, and power.
Based on Conn being a superb boxer and very durable.
Mendoza
03-10-2010, 06:11 AM
Based on Conn being a superb boxer and very durable.
If Conn was such a good boxer, why did he lose nine fights by decision and draw once? My point is he was in fact out boxed often.
I agree that Billy was a skilled guy. He just does not have the reach or power to jab with Witherpsoon, and Witherspoon was not a slow footed shuffler like Louis was. Witherspoon was rather hard to hit.
Examples of a shorter man giving up many inches in reach and out jabbing a much larger skilled fighter are rare.
Unforgiven
03-10-2010, 06:29 AM
If Conn was such a good boxer, why did he lose nine fights by decision and draw once? My point is he was in fact out boxed often.
Six of those losses came in 4-round and 6-rounders in his first year of fighting, when he was 16/17 years old. He was learning. He had no amateur fights.
The other three decision losses were to great fighters.
I agree that Billy was a skilled guy. He just does not have the reach or power to jab with Witherpsoon, and Witherspoon was not a slow footed shuffler like Louis was. Witherspoon was rather hard to hit.
Witherspoon wasn't that hard to hit.
And he wasn't quick on his feet either.
Examples of a shorter man giving up many inches in reach and out jabbing a much larger skilled fighter are rare.
Conn would outboxed Witherspoon. And not just with the jab.
vBulletin® v3.8.0, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.