PDA

View Full Version : F*ck compuBOX

GARCIA
10-07-2007, 01:37 AM
How accurate are they?

I don't believe any of the numbers they put up.

Barrera landed more than given credit, and PAC landed less but given credit for more...
Boom_Boom
10-07-2007, 01:39 AM
Keep telling yourself that...
allenko1
10-07-2007, 01:40 AM
lol...How do you figure?
1punch1nder
10-07-2007, 02:10 AM
i don't think you are better than the people in compubox.
Rsanchez
10-07-2007, 02:17 AM
Pac won easy, but compubox has always been worthless.
Shane_Erich
10-07-2007, 02:32 AM
I thought Pac won easy, but I thought the compubox numbers were bullshit. Barrera landed alot more punches than he was given credit for. Do they have a couple 90 year olds counting punches??
LeonMcS
10-07-2007, 02:36 AM
I've had my doubts on it for a little while, would like to know how they tally it up. Its like in the amateurs, they have five judges who press a button when they think a punch has landed, and its only scored if three or more press within a second [This was the method a few years ago, unsure if it still is].
My point is, if 3 guys cant see a clear punch, and it does happen, how accurate is compubox? Is it one guy tallying one fighters total, one counting punches thrown? Basically, does it come down to one guys opinion if a punch landed or not?
cardstars
10-07-2007, 02:40 AM
I've had my doubts on it for a little while, would like to know how they tally it up. Its like in the amateurs, they have five judges who press a button when they think a punch has landed, and its only scored if three or more press within a second [This was the method a few years ago, unsure if it still is].
My point is, if 3 guys cant see a clear punch, and it does happen, how accurate is compubox? Is it one guy tallying one fighters total, one counting punches thrown? Basically, does it come down to one guys opinion if a punch landed or not?

It depends how trigger happy they are.....did they have decaf?
Rsanchez
10-07-2007, 02:40 AM
Compubox counts the pitty pat puches that PACMAN typically throws in his combinations. Once again, PAC won easy and he is a hard puncher when he's not pitty pattying, but compubox doesn't differentiate; quantitative, not qualitative.
Rsanchez
10-07-2007, 02:43 AM
Compubox is perfect for Jim Lampley; he doesn't know shit about boxing so he uses this worthless tool as a guide for his blow by blow commentary.
Rsanchez
10-07-2007, 02:46 AM
Compubox differentiates between powershots, jabs, and bodyshots? Yea; a powershot is anything other than a jab or body shot; even if the overhand right is a mere slap. Sorry El Rey, it needs to be more sophisticated than that.
Rsanchez
10-07-2007, 02:51 AM
Yea, but you said it's a little more complicated. I don't agree; I think it's too simplistic.
chimba
10-07-2007, 02:52 AM
What are you getting at? Their system is shit. I'm just telling you how it's done.

Hes telling you its not correct the way its done. not all punches that are not jabs and bodyshots are powerpunches but compubox counts it this way
andyZOR
10-07-2007, 02:52 AM
woot
Rsanchez
10-07-2007, 02:55 AM
Okay, then I misunderstood.
cuchulain
10-07-2007, 03:00 AM
Compubox is not a good way to measure the course of a fight.

However, Pac won by a WIDE margin.