PDA

View Full Version : ERIK was better than MAB

chimba
10-07-2007, 02:01 AM
A better MAN a better fighter..
the_what
10-07-2007, 02:02 AM
MAB tapped that ass though.
TanstA
10-07-2007, 02:02 AM
indeed. a better boxer too
Zakman
10-07-2007, 02:04 AM
Nope. And Barrera will historically be regarded as the better fighter, I'd bet money on it, too.
Still~style
10-07-2007, 02:06 AM
A better MAN a better fighter..

ok you little fuckin monkey.
chimba
10-07-2007, 02:06 AM
Not when they remember his whinning cheating lkegacy and what how hardcore Erik was compared to him...Just because he beat Erik 2 out of 3 doesnt mean he was better . Erik Tapped JJones ass while MAB gave him his ...Erik beat PAC while MAB lost twice

Just as a mexican, if this is true warrior aztec shit...Erik hands down
chimba
10-07-2007, 02:07 AM
ok you little fuckin monkey.

dont get mad, shithead:rofl a 50% PAC whupped and outboxed your running piece of shit MAB
4Rounder
10-07-2007, 02:08 AM
Nope. And Barrera will historically be regarded as the better fighter, I'd bet money on it, too.

I don't think so, I think they will go down right next to each other as both have very good and similar resumes. MAB may have two wins over EM but EM has wins over the two men that beat Barrera.

I really don't see why some people hold Barrera in much higher status than Morales.
MagnaNasakki
10-07-2007, 03:05 AM
They're pretty equal. Barrera had longevity and the fact that head to head, prime Barrera beat prime Morales. That evens out the fact the Erik beat Jones and Pacman.
Danny Ocean
10-07-2007, 03:06 AM
Just because he beat Erik 2 out of 3 doesnt mean he was better
:rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl
Boom_Boom
10-07-2007, 03:07 AM
Mab was the better brawler and EM was the better boxer
CASH_718
10-07-2007, 03:09 AM
A better MAN a better fighter..If Pac Man didn't fight Barerra or Morales you wouldn't even know who the fuck they were you asshole.
chimba
10-07-2007, 03:11 AM
If Pac Man didn't fight Barerra or Morales you wouldn't even know who the fuck they were you asshole.

So whats your point? So PAC destroyed them both and I got to know them/ Yeah BTW MAB fought like an Aztec Warrior tonight lol "this is for Mexico" and you know what..pssst I'll tell you something, PAC beat Mab in his own game EASY
PirateGorilla
10-07-2007, 03:12 AM
Morales all CLASS and will ALWAYS be remembered as a WARRIOR.

I can't say much for Barrera.

Morales >>>>>> Barrera
Boom_Boom
10-07-2007, 03:12 AM
Tell pacman to move up to 135 so Anthony Peterson could smack him back down to 126 where he belongs.

would u stfu about a Pacman/Peterson fight happening

thats as dumb and random as a Pavlik/Pascal fight
pejevan
10-07-2007, 03:13 AM
I am thinking that MAB took this fight to show that he is better than Morales. Remember that Junior Jones defeated MAB twice but Jones was annihilated by EM. By surviving against pacman, his legacy will probably be better than Morales. I might be wrong though.

In this fight, MAB was never really intending to fight but to survive. He only throws punch when he is punched. That is why this fight sucks in terms of excitement. Compared to the JMM-MAB fight where here were significant exchanges. MAB has lesser repect for JMM's power that is why there were lot of exchanges.

When MAB went into a defensive clamshell, there is nothing that MP can do to make the fight exciting. Despite being old, accrding to MP, MAB has been the hardest puncher he met. So he has to respect that by trying not get tagged by a counterpunch.What people forget is that MAB has a very respectable power as evidenced when he KDed JMM. This is a fight that MP won using boxing ability.

If you are using this performance to gauge how JMM would do, that would be entirely wrong. JMM and MAB are entirely two different beast. JMM is featherfisted relative to JMM and MP. When MP does not respect your power, it would be a slugfest.
doknochrisan
10-07-2007, 03:16 AM
Humberto Soto would ravish pacman.

Who else would beat PAC? :yep
knockout
10-07-2007, 03:19 AM
[quote=doknochrisan]Who else would beat PAC? :yep[/quotehe would pick any 1 against pac.:lol:
chimba
10-07-2007, 03:19 AM
I am thinking that MAB took this fight to show that he is better than Morales. Remember that Junior Jones defeated MAB twice but Jones was annihilated by EM. By surviving against pacman, his legacy will probably be better than Morales. I might be wrong though.

In this fight, MAB was never really intending to fight but to survive. He only throws punch when he is punched. That is why this fight sucks in terms of excitement. Compared to the JMM-MAB fight where here were significant exchanges. MAB has lesser repect for JMM's power that is why there were lot of exchanges.

When MAB went into a defensive clamshell, there is nothing that MP can do to make the fight exciting. Despite being old, accrding to MP, MAB has been the hardest puncher he met. So he has to respect that by trying not get tagged by a counterpunch.What people forget is that MAB has a very respectable power as evidenced when he KDed JMM. This is a fight that MP won using boxing ability.

If you are using this performance to gauge how JMM would do, that would be entirely wrong. JMM and MAB are entirely two different beast. JMM is featherfisted relative to JMM and MP. When MP does not respect your power, it would be a slugfest.

This a great post, I wouldnt call JMM featherfisted but PAC did respect MABS power, I do remember his saying that MAB was the hardest puncher hes faced