View Full Version : Did Peter attack McCline like he attacked Wlad?
Stezzie
10-09-2007, 12:14 AM
Everybody takes the McCline fight now to define Peter...Peter claims his hand was broken 3 weeks ago... Now looking back at the fight does anyone notice anything different about Peters attack on McCline vs his attack on Wlad...? Do you think there is any proof to support the broken hand theory based on his past perfomances?
Stezzie
10-09-2007, 12:21 AM
no. that's just a sorry ass excuse peters is coming up with for his poor performance.
If it were true would it change your out-take on the fight?
Alcaldemb
10-09-2007, 12:23 AM
It isn't. At the post fight presser his hands were not wrapped and he had fully mobility. The reason his attack was different is his fundementals were actually better, that said his power is overrated as his chin. His heart isn't, but as we saw with Gatti, heart will only take you so far.
KobeIsGod
10-09-2007, 12:23 AM
His hands looked ok to me :lol:
[Only registered and activated users can see links]
In answer to the original question, i dont think he pursued mccline like he did wlad and i dont think it was because of his hands. he was clearly less aggressive probably due to the kds and his conditioning (7 pounds heavier) than against wlad. he looked like a brickwall against wlad. now, his body looks preyty soft. he seemed like a hungrier fighter before.
In_FlaMeS
10-09-2007, 01:11 AM
Peter is just a paper champ...
Rudolph
10-09-2007, 03:26 AM
Whoever is training Peter is ruining him. They put a false idea in his head that he's a boxer. He's not. He's a slugger.
vBulletin® v3.8.0, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.