PDA

View Full Version : WBA OK's 9 and 11 rounds


Daddy
10-11-2007, 02:58 PM
[Only registered and activated users can see links]

Check it. WBA is OKing 9 and 11 rounders. What's your thoughts? I think it's pretty good to have odd numbers of rounds again.

Drew101
10-11-2007, 03:03 PM
Ugh!

And to think I bitched about the reduction from fifteen to twelve!

bumdujour
10-11-2007, 03:05 PM
[Only registered and activated users can see links]

Check it. WBA is OKing 9 and 11 rounders. What's your thoughts? I think it's pretty good to have odd numbers of rounds again.

great:patsch

the WBA is working really hard to give boxing the bullet to the neck:tired

achillesthegreat
10-11-2007, 03:10 PM
They are such fucking morons.

It doesn't help draws. If judges are properly scoring even rounds then one even round and the rest split makes a draw.

These ABCs have one goal - kill boxing. I think Dana White owns them now or some shit. This is madness.

Ambition_Def
10-11-2007, 03:24 PM
They are such fucking morons.

It doesn't help draws. If judges are properly scoring even rounds then one even round and the rest split makes a draw.

These ABCs have one goal - kill boxing. I think Dana White owns them now or some shit. This is madness.

[Only registered and activated users can see links]

sues2nd
10-11-2007, 03:30 PM
Its great to have an odd number of rounds. Should be universal.

Lampley
10-11-2007, 03:31 PM
I'd like to hear his logic for saying that this will help prevent controversial decisions. What difference does number of rounds make if the scores are wrong?

And are draws a serious problem in the sport? How many major fights end up in draws? It happens from time to time, and in a good fight it sets up a juicy rematch.

The worst part of this is it will give Heavyweights even more incentive not to train. Those guys would love to have 8 round fights.

TBooze
10-11-2007, 03:32 PM
I remember the NABF trying an extra 13th round in the 80s, if a fight was scored a draw. It did not last long, as it was quite simply stupid and dangerous to expect two fighters to have another round at least five minutes (nearer 15 me thinks) after the last action. (Ron Essett WS13 Sanderline Williams is no misprint!)

I know what the WBA purposes is slightly different, but still rather silly IMO.

allenko1
10-11-2007, 03:39 PM
They are such fucking morons.

It doesn't help draws. If judges are properly scoring even rounds then one even round and the rest split makes a draw.

These ABCs have one goal - kill boxing. I think Dana White owns them now or some shit. This is madness.

It's stupid. I read it this morning and I can't see any way this makes since even for those made-up titles...

sues2nd
10-11-2007, 03:40 PM
I'd like to hear his logic for saying that this will help prevent controversial decisions. What difference does number of rounds make if the scores are wrong?

And are draws a serious problem in the sport? How many major fights end up in draws? It happens from time to time, and in a good fight it sets up a juicy rematch.

The worst part of this is it will give Heavyweights even more incentive not to train. Those guys would love to have 8 round fights.

Good points....the more I think about it....the more I dont like it.

mike464
10-11-2007, 04:08 PM
Why does the number of rounds have to go down. How about moving it up to 13?

Fab2333
10-11-2007, 04:10 PM
great:patsch

the WBA is working really hard to give boxing the bullet to the neck:tired:deal