Vockerman
10-23-2007, 03:16 PM
This is being debated in the general forum right now and it seems they have reached a consensus that amounts to...
"AHhh Hell NO!"
Here is my take -
Arturo "Thunder" Gatti retired with a record of 40 wins and 9 losses, with 31 wins by knockout. Losing that many fights in the modern era is difficult to overcome and he will never be listed as one of the ATG’s. However it is the hall of FAME not the Hall of All Time Greatness, so let me make a case for him.
Gatti is considered by many boxing experts and fans alike to be one of the most exciting boxers of his era. He has participated in Ring Magazine's "fight of the year" a total of four times. Every single guy with four or more appearances as Ring Magazine’s "fight of the year" (win or lose, Gatti is 2-2) are in the Hall (Basilio, Tunney, Foreman, Frazier, Louis, Schmeling and Ali) Gatti became world champion when he narrowly outpointed Tracy Harris Patterson and then signed a multi-fight deal with HBO. On January 24, 2004, Gatti, recovering from a broken hand, scored a tenth round knock-down and defeated Gianluca Branco of Italy by a twelve round unanimous decision to win the vacant WBC junior welterweight title. He has the titles – the wide exposure (HBO) – and the historic fights to legitimately be in the Hall – in my opinion.
So, Classic posters, did I make my case? Can I make it stronger? Should I even be making a case for a guy with great heart but mediocre boxing skills?
What is your opinion of this HOF vote that will likely take place in a few years?
"AHhh Hell NO!"
Here is my take -
Arturo "Thunder" Gatti retired with a record of 40 wins and 9 losses, with 31 wins by knockout. Losing that many fights in the modern era is difficult to overcome and he will never be listed as one of the ATG’s. However it is the hall of FAME not the Hall of All Time Greatness, so let me make a case for him.
Gatti is considered by many boxing experts and fans alike to be one of the most exciting boxers of his era. He has participated in Ring Magazine's "fight of the year" a total of four times. Every single guy with four or more appearances as Ring Magazine’s "fight of the year" (win or lose, Gatti is 2-2) are in the Hall (Basilio, Tunney, Foreman, Frazier, Louis, Schmeling and Ali) Gatti became world champion when he narrowly outpointed Tracy Harris Patterson and then signed a multi-fight deal with HBO. On January 24, 2004, Gatti, recovering from a broken hand, scored a tenth round knock-down and defeated Gianluca Branco of Italy by a twelve round unanimous decision to win the vacant WBC junior welterweight title. He has the titles – the wide exposure (HBO) – and the historic fights to legitimately be in the Hall – in my opinion.
So, Classic posters, did I make my case? Can I make it stronger? Should I even be making a case for a guy with great heart but mediocre boxing skills?
What is your opinion of this HOF vote that will likely take place in a few years?