Expert?!

[achillesthegreat]

Question Expert:
Are you actually being serious with your threads? They do appear quite annoying and stupid.

Question to everyone else:
What do you think of Expert? Do you like his posts or do you think he is just spamming the forum with BS?

Eitherway I don't mind but I need to check.

[GazOC]

He's a wind up merchant.

[LeedsLad]

lol he has a strange obsession with Hatton fighting at 154:huh

[sandwichsurgeon]

lol he has a strange obsession with Hatton fighting at 154:huh

strange is too soft a word to describe Expert

[Smith]

It tells it all when he calls himself expert, then constantly asks questions

[China_hand_Joe]

He's a wind up merchant.
"Hatton license should be revoked...

for his fighting style?"

But one without any real humour or character. We have Dunky, I'm not sure Expert's services are required.

[stake501]

every forum needs a friendly troll

the naz obsession is hilarious....

[brown bomber]

Question Expert:
Are you actually being serious with your threads? They do appear quite annoying and stupid.

Question to everyone else:
What do you think of Expert? Do you like his posts or do you think he is just spamming the forum with BS?

Eitherway I don't mind but I need to check. I like having him on the Forum- I find his posts hilarious but can see why other people may get pissed- all i'll say is i'd rather have 100 experts then the idiots who speak shit but think they are right.

[GazOC]

every forum needs a friendly troll



But as Joe says, it should be done with sublty, humour and panache! :D

[pambele]

Yes.

[nulty]

I don't really care. I'm a bit bored with him now, but he's harmless enough.

[achillesthegreat]

It appears you all think he is petty but don't mind having him about.

Rock on Expert.

[Dunky McCafferty]

He just annoys me a bit cos he brings the real Hatton haters like me down. When I discuss Hatton, I always have reasons behind my criticisms, & try to back them up in an argument. Granted, even I have got a little petty in the past & got too personal about Hatton at times, but after a few Hatton fans who I like here got a bit annoyed I decided to cut back on the nonsense out of respect to my fellow posters.

Now I only debate Hatton the boxer & not the person, cos its important to respect your fellow posters here. After all, we all llive in the same small space.

So I was annoyed when I put a story about Witters comments on Hatton in for a bit of debate, & Expert threw in some aimless threads above it. So I got annoyed & told him to cut the bullshit.

You know me though, Im a moody cunt:D BUT, if hes just fannying about making aimless threads about how great Naz is & how bad Hatton is without backing it up... Thats just being a pain in the ass for being a pain in the asses sake like I said before. HOWEVER If he can back up his arguments I will love him like a brother, but if he cant? Whats the point of having a guy who causes trouble with one word replys.

Over to Expert! Time to step up to the plate.

[NOrth]

good post that, you been drinking? :-)

[Dunky McCafferty]

"Hatton license should be revoked...

for his fighting style?"

But one without any real humour or character. We have Dunky, I'm not sure Expert's services are required.

Oh is that right is it me old China???

You saying we already have one humourless characterless Hatton hater here that goes by the name of Dunky without the need for another?

I got your card marked Rupert;) :D

[China_hand_Joe]

;) :DYou use too many emotions, the same goes for everyone else here.

[Dunky McCafferty]

good post that, you been drinking? :-)

I read the first three words & thought "aah North, Im beginning to like that fella!"

& then I read the last three words. Now I hate you again.

[NOrth]

wouldnt have it any other way ;-)

[Dunky McCafferty]

You use too many emotions, the same goes for everyone else here.

Its a double edged sword though, isnt it?

I use two emotions on you at the end of my post, & you complain that thats too many(im guessing its cos you cant work out if im joking or being sarcastic & laughing at my own sarcasm)

& then I dont use emotions when talking to North in the next post, & although I could be joking, it looks as if I am being deadly serious when I say I hate him.

In other words, you cant win! I think its all about getting used fellow posters character traits, sense of humour & their idiosyncrasys.

Keeping friends on ESB is a tough business, cos its so diverse that every post you make is under scrutiny.

So think about that next time you pull me up for posting one too many smilies! & the fact I have used no smilies here, does that mean I am being serious & giving you a telling of for pulling me up, or am I being respectful & talking to you as you wish, with no emotions/smilies whatsoever? the permutations are endless my friend, endless!!!

[China_hand_Joe]

Emotions are a sign of weakness.

I have even ceased my use of "smiley number 2" (the one that often expresses you have found humour within a post you are replying to, or indicates humour within your own post).

[Dunky McCafferty]

Emotions are a sign of weakness.

I have even ceased my use of "smiley number 2" (the one that often expresses you have found humour within a post you are replying to, or indicates humour within your own post).

Its all about opinions my good man, howzat for a cop out?;) (& of course, predictable cunt that I am I used a cheeky wee wink smiley at the end just to joke my way out of taking this awkward discussion any further!)

Why? Cos thats how I roll!

[buddynabuick]

Emotions are a sign of weakness.

I have even ceased my use of "smiley number 2" (the one that often expresses you have found humour within a post you are replying to, or indicates humour within your own post).



So a lack of emotion would be a sign of.......:think

[Dunky McCafferty]

wouldnt have it any other way ;-)

Dont worry North, I love you really;) :D

[Amsterdam]

He's a sour Hamed fan who is delusional about what Hamed *could* have been capable of physically but never accomplished.

But as the others have said, he's redundant and his material is weak, but not really a pest.

[China_hand_Joe]

Its all about opinions my good man, howzat for a cop out?;) (& of course, predictable cunt that I am I used a cheeky wee wink smiley at the end just to joke my way out of taking this awkward discussion any further!)

Why? Cos thats how I roll!I am not keen on the excessive use of exclaimation marks either.


But it is undisputable that emotions are a sign of weakness. Just look at all the best people in history.

Roger Federer, Hitler, Thierry Henry...and so on - all show little emotion.


So using excessive smilies should really be bannable on forums like this.

[brown bomber]

:bbb :verysad :-(( :hi: :rasta :thumbsup :rofl :admin :rasta :-( ;) :nut :verysad :rasta :admin :happy I am not keen on the excessive use of exclaimation marks either.


But it is undisputable that emotions are a sign of weakness. Just look at all the best people in history.

Roger Federer, Hitler, Thierry Henry...and so on - all show little emotion.


So using excessive smilies should really be bannable on forums like this.:nut :rofl :oops: :p :scaredas: :yikes

[NOrth]

But it is undisputable that emotions are a sign of weakness. Just look at all the best people in history.

Roger Federer, Hitler, Thierry Henry...and so on - all show little emotion.



"undisputable that emotions are a sign of weakness" - how bizzare, also, Hitler described as one of the best people in history.... You do realise that even in jest thats pretty tasteless. Unless theres another Hitler aside the nut bag who persecuted millions of innocent people.

[Charles187]

"undisputable that emotions are a sign of weakness" - how bizzare, also, Hitler described as one of the best people in history.... You do realise that even in jest thats pretty tasteless. Unless theres another Hitler aside the nut bag who persecuted millions of innocent people.

Harry Hitler from Nuneaton

[buddynabuick]

:bbb :verysad :-(( :hi: :rasta :thumbsup :rofl :admin :rasta :-( ;) :nut :verysad :rasta :admin :happy :nut :rofl :oops: :p :scaredas: :yikes




:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::D:D:oops::oops::oops::hey:tired:tired:b bb:bart:bart:scaredas::p:-( I am very emotional:party

[NOrth]

Harry Hitler from Nuneaton

Oh, HARRY Hitler, that emotionless strong character - get ya now.

--------------------------------------------

"O... Mr Hitler...... any relation?"

"Well, Ive got a mother ??"

"Oh, no, i ment Adolf..."

"yes, thts her."


(dating agency in bottom)

---------------------------------------

[Charles187]

Oh, HARRY Hitler, that emotionless strong character - get ya now.

--------------------------------------------

"O... Mr Hitler...... any relation?"

"Well, Ive got a mother ??"

"Oh, no, i ment Adolf..."

"yes, thts her."


(dating agency in bottom)

---------------------------------------

Harry does alot of charity work in and around the local area. He has had a big burden to bare becouse of his surname but he never lets it get to him, he just goes about his daily life with grace and survility. He is a wonderful human being that we could all stand to learn alot from.

[China_hand_Joe]

"undisputable that emotions are a sign of weakness" - how bizzare, also, Hitler described as one of the best people in history.... You do realise that even in jest thats pretty tasteless. Unless theres another Hitler aside the nut bag who persecuted millions of innocent people.He may have been quite evil, but he is also one of the best leaders of people the world has ever seen, though not on par with Federer's tennis.

[NOrth]

Dont even go there, he persecuted and murdered millions of innocent people. People often make statements like "yeah but he had some good ideas like industry mass production" - yes but they were slightly outweighed by concentration camps and the idea of the super race.

You might think differently towards his "leadership of people" had you been a jew living in germany, after all he would have been your leader too, no?

Go to Auschwitz in Poland, 1.1m died there, from starvation, disease, rigours of hard labour, beatings, torture, shooting, hanging, gassing or Phenol injections to the heart - many of the deaths would have been in the main courtyard for all the other inmates to see thier future fate. Then come back on here and describe him as one of the best people in history. The guy was responsible for the Hollocaust for goodness sakes.

Not sure this is the forum for a discussion on this topic, but go there (aushwitz) its modern history.

[Charles187]

Dont even go there, he persecuted and murdered millions of innocent people. People often make statements like "yeah but he had some good ideas like industry mass production" - yes but they were slightly outweighed by concentration camps and the idea of the super race.

You might think differently towards his "leadership of people" had you been a jew living in germany, after all he would have been your leader too, no?

Go to Auschwitz in Poland, 1.1m died there, from starvation, disease, rigours of hard labour, beatings, torture, shooting, hanging, gassing or Phenol injections to the heart - many of the deaths would have been in the main courtyard for all the other inmates to see thier future fate. Then come back on here and describe him as one of the best people in history. The guy was responsible for the Hollocaust for goodness sakes.

Not sure this is the forum for a discussion on this topic, but go there (aushwitz) its modern history.

Are we still talking about Harry? Il have to ask him but that all seems very out of charecter, hes usually so well mannered.

[China_hand_Joe]

Dont even go there, he persecuted and murdered millions of innocent people. People often make statements like "yeah but he had some good ideas like industry mass production" - yes but they were slightly outweighed by concentration camps and the idea of the super race.

You might think differently towards his "leadership of people" had you been a jew living in germany, after all he would have been your leader too, no?

Go to Auschwitz in Poland, 1.1m died there, from starvation, disease, rigours of hard labour, beatings, torture, shooting, hanging, gassing or Phenol injections to the heart - many of the deaths would have been in the main courtyard for all the other inmates to see thier future fate. Then come back on here and describe him as one of the best people in history. The guy was responsible for the Hollocaust for goodness sakes.

Not sure this is the forum for a discussion on this topic, but go there (aushwitz) its modern history.Do you think Stalin was a poor leader too?

[NOrth]

You say Hitler was a good leader, yet he Murdered millions of his own poeple! If you were one of those million(s), or connected to someone who was would you think he was a good leader? He began a world war which killed (from memory) roughly 60 million people, which included 7million of his own people.

Stalin. Well his main achievment was the advancment of russia through his 5 year plans. On the surface they pushed the economy forwards, but they had flaws in that the targets set were unrealistic. Unskilled peasents were used as skilled labour, in time machinery would break as the peasents had no knowledge of how to work the damned things. This in turn led thefactories to sit idle, whihc in turn led to panic as the unrealistic targets would fall further behind. Factory managers wouldbe shot / executed as targets were not met. This would lead to a fear factor within the idustrial sector, and thus false figures being produced... the vicious circle thus continues.
The workers themselves earnt pittance and their standard of living was shite. but hey, this Stalin (which translates to iron man - or somehting) must be right, so we'll live through a couple of years hard graft and poverty to get there in the end.
Workers would be jailed and executed for not working to standard.

there was famine in russia, not only that stalin was exporting food to make money whilst his own people died of starvation.

Granted, Russia became a strong power in industry.. but his "people" went through a lot of shit to get there.

being a great leader isnt just about the surface end product, its about underlying factors, and the treatment of people at grass roots must be taken into consideration.
-------------------------------------------

Food for thought....


Stalin was responsible for solidifying the Soviet Union after Lenin's death, and became a brutal dictator, ultimately responsible for the deaths of an estimated 20 million people, most of whom were Russians, and ironically mostly workers and peasants whom Stalin claimed to represent. Stalin's regime was marked by brutality, repression, mass murder, extraterritorial expansion into neighboring states, genocide, mass imprisonment and deportation, and was ultimately the cause of much fear and concern around the world for the future of civilisation and the continued freedom of the Human Race. Stalin's policies and practices not only caused much fear and consternation within and without Russia and its occupied territories, but almost irreparably damaged the Russian economy and caused significant harm to the economies of the Free World, in asmuch as untold energy and funds and lives were spent in reacting the continuous threat to freedom posed by the Soviet Russia and even today by way of legacy the Russian Federation. While Stalin had a vision of a great Russia, he explicitly stated that he thought he would have to kill more than half the population (who disagreed with his vision) in order to achieve his goals. Today, it is agreed by all who have studied the topic, whether inside or outside Russia and whether they personally are Russian or German or English or Japanese, Stalin has done more harm to Russia and to Russians than any foreign power could ever have achieved. Even today, Stalin's legacy is one of fear, paranoia and aggression, as seen in the policies of the increasingly desperate acts and statements of Russia's leaders of today.

[China_hand_Joe]

One quarter of Russians would vote for Stalin if he ran for leadership today mate.

[NOrth]

Source of that statistic? Also, not that impressive is it. A great leader only commands 25% of votes through peoples retrospect!
Imagine is you asked Americans how many of themwould vote for Lincon if he were alive today!! (Just an off the cuff example) I'd wager it'd be more than 25%
If Stalin did today what he did back then he'd be lambasted by international powers.

[China_hand_Joe]

Source of that statistic? Also, not that impressive is it. A great leader only commands 25% of votes through peoples retrospect!
Imagine is you asked Americans how many of themwould vote for Lincon if he were alive today!! (Just an off the cuff example) I'd wager it'd be more than 25%
If Stalin did today what he did back then he'd be lambasted by international powers.There are similar statistics littered all over the place just google, "stalin russians poll". He's not nearly as hated as you'd expect a murderer of millions to be and the West don't seem to have a problem with that fact either.

[NOrth]

I doubt Bush even knows who he is! Probably thinks its a make of wardrobe found in Ikea.

[achillesthegreat]

Chinas the man - 'emoticons are a sign of weakness'.