PDA

View Full Version : Which promoter is the best*, in Europe, North America and in the rest of the world?


Decebal
11-17-2007, 08:41 AM
BEST* = he can make you good fights that are not too dangerous and help you develop until you move into your peak, he can get you a title fight when you are ready, some good defences that will make you an established name and help you reach your peak and then the big fights against the very best such that even after a loss he can get your career back on track against top opposition and, when you are ready, another title fight/unification fight.

bulakenyo
11-17-2007, 08:48 AM
yep, the Bobfather is the don of all boxing promoters.

Club Fighter
11-17-2007, 08:49 AM
A "good promoter" is an oxymoron so I can't really chime in with an answer. Corruption is so entrenched in the promotion game that it's sickening.

bulakenyo
11-17-2007, 08:52 AM
decebal didnt ask who was a "good" promoter.

he asked who was the best promoter to handle up and comers/prospects to guide them to a future title shot.

Club Fighter
11-17-2007, 08:56 AM
What I'm saying is I can't pick a "better" of two evils. It's sorta like American politics. You're damned if you do, you're damned if you don't.

Decebal
11-17-2007, 08:57 AM
What I'm saying is I can't pick a "better" of two evils. It's sorta like American politics. You're damned if you do, you're damned if you don't.

Ok, then pick the most evil one...according to your definition.

bulakenyo
11-17-2007, 09:01 AM
do you think it would better for a fighter to be a freelancer?

having only 1 fight contract at a time to the highest bidding promoter?

Decebal
11-17-2007, 09:02 AM
do you think it would better for a fighter to be a freelancer?

having only 1 fight contract at a time to the highest bidding promoter?

Interesting...never thought of it...:think

:good

nervousxtian
11-17-2007, 09:05 AM
All promoters are evil bastards.

We need a commission and standards that promoters need to adhere too.

Decebal
11-17-2007, 09:06 AM
I feel some of you are not levelling with the thread's question here, you incorrigible idealists, you!:nono

bulakenyo
11-17-2007, 09:09 AM
Interesting...never thought of it...:think

:good


i think BHop has done that. He's his own manager and I think he only negotiates on a per fight basis.

The problem with that is he never became a "BigName" fighter for years, even when he kept on winning and defending his belt.

He only got big after beating Tito Trinidad.

Sometimes you need someone to sell you to the boxing public.

Decebal
11-17-2007, 09:10 AM
i think BHop has done that. He's his own manager and I think he only negotiates on a per fight basis.

The problem with that is he never became a "BigName" fighter for years, even when he kept on winning and defending his belt.

He only got big after beating Tito Trinidad.

Sometimes you need someone to sell you to the boxing public.

Yeah...it seems to make sense only by the time you are very good and fairly well known...(I am glad you are posting in General, bulakenyo!;)

bulakenyo
11-17-2007, 09:12 AM
:hey

Tom_Tocca
11-17-2007, 09:28 AM
In Europe it has to be a tie between ****** and Universum (Kohl).

Haye
11-17-2007, 10:02 AM
Bob Arum

Decebal
11-17-2007, 10:10 AM
So...Bob Arum, de la Hoya, ******, Kohl...in that case, why aren't ALL the top boxers with them? Or is the catch not worth it to be with the best?

africandawg
11-17-2007, 10:37 AM
A promoter is a necessary [evil] theres no ways you can really create interest as you progress as a fighter without the all important PR & media cover that a promoter can give you as well as being able to make the fights you need as you go further-----just try to pick the best of a very tricky bunch.

Toney
11-17-2007, 10:49 AM
In Europe it has to be a tie between ****** and Universum (Kohl).
Sauerland Event or ******.

Sauerland really takes care of their guys. If I could get my kid to sign with any promotor in the world, it would be Sauerland Event, no doubt about it!