PDA

View Full Version : If they go toe-to-toe, who survives Saturday night?


swedeone
07-06-2007, 04:17 PM
You know Lamon is going to be aggressive and come after Wlad. IF Wlad is baited into a slugfest, will be stay in there and trade? If so, and they go toe-to-toe... what happens? :bbb

Interesting.... :think

KillerInstinct
07-06-2007, 04:20 PM
Brewster probably stop him. How about, who would win a jab fest!?!?! Hmm..interesting!

Muchmoore
07-06-2007, 04:22 PM
Wlads head will fly into 7th row. Brewster is unstoppable.

Fat Tony
07-06-2007, 04:23 PM
You know Lamon is going to be aggressive and come after Wlad. IF Wlad is baited into a slugfest, will be stay in there and trade? If so, and they go toe-to-toe... what happens? :bbb

Interesting.... :think

Brewster would knock him out.

But why should Wlad trade with Lamon? :huh He'll stay on the outside, jab, jab, jab, ..., straight right AND good bye Lamon.

swedeone
07-06-2007, 04:27 PM
Brewster would knock him out.

But why should Wlad trade with Lamon? :huh He'll stay on the outside, jab, jab, jab, ..., straight right AND good bye Lamon.



That was against a few tomato cans... and not Lamon Brewster. I think if Lamon does not fight scared and goes after Wlad, he can hurt Wlad. If he fights on the outside and doesn't press the action and let his hands go, I agree with your prediction.

vonBanditos
07-06-2007, 04:28 PM
If Klitschko is stupid enough to slug and allow Brewster to slug back then he deserves to get knocked out. It'd be a fantastic fight, but it's the absolute last thing that he wants to do.

Shpion
07-06-2007, 04:28 PM
You know Lamon is going to be aggressive and come after Wlad. IF Wlad is baited into a slugfest, will be stay in there and trade? If so, and they go toe-to-toe... what happens? :bbb

Interesting.... :think

Have ever seen the younger Klitschko go toe to toe with anybody? I have not.

BoxingGuru
07-06-2007, 04:28 PM
Wlads head will fly into 7th row. Brewster is unstoppable.

Funny considering his losses. By that logic, I believe he is stoppable.

We've all seen that Brewster doesn't show up for every fight. Kali Meehan beat him and was freaking robbed. That says a lot.

swedeone
07-06-2007, 04:33 PM
Funny considering his losses. By that logic, I believe he is stoppable.

We've all seen that Brewster doesn't show up for every fight. Kali Meehan beat him and was freaking robbed. That says a lot.


Lamon has a LOT of pride and shows it when it counts. I think he will fight well tomorrow night and will either KO Wlad or get KO'd. He is a warrior. :yep

brooklyn1550
07-06-2007, 04:34 PM
Lamon would win if they went toe to toe

Shpion
07-06-2007, 04:38 PM
Lamon would win if they went toe to toe

No doubt.

Gabriel R.
07-06-2007, 04:39 PM
If they went toe to toe, that would mean we see the best Brewster ever. And still, that wouldn't be enough to beat Klitschko.

kg0208
07-06-2007, 04:40 PM
If Brewster can't get on the inside, Wlad is gonna beat him. If he can get inside and stay there....then it becomes a different fight. Getting inside can be painful fighting Wlad. I think Wlad hits harder than Brewster.

Muchmoore
07-06-2007, 04:40 PM
Funny considering his losses. By that logic, I believe he is stoppable.

We've all seen that Brewster doesn't show up for every fight. Kali Meehan beat him and was freaking robbed. That says a lot.

Brewster was poisoned by the Meehan camp. Thats the only logical way that Brewster could have had a CLOSE fight with Meehan.

Brewster KO1.

kg0208
07-06-2007, 04:41 PM
If they went toe to toe, that would mean we see the best Brewster ever. And still, that wouldn't be enough to beat Klitschko.

That makes no sense....how do you account for Brewster beating Wlad already if this statement is true?

MrMagic
07-06-2007, 04:42 PM
Wlad would not handle Brewsters heat.
Wlad would get pulverized.

Gabriel R.
07-06-2007, 04:47 PM
That makes no sense....how do you account for Brewster beating Wlad already if this statement is true?

How I account for it? Brewster didn't beat Wlad by going toe to toe with him, he beat him when he was far behind on the scorecards. Got the sense?

kg0208
07-06-2007, 04:53 PM
How I account for it? Brewster didn't beat Wlad by going toe to toe with him, he beat him when he was far behind on the scorecards. Got the sense?

No....that makes no sense still. You're saying that him going toe to toe would somehow equate that to being the best possible version of Brewster ever. Then you go on to say that this version of the best Brewster still couldn't beat Wlad. But if the best version couldn't....then how did the earlier version?

wrastla285
07-06-2007, 04:55 PM
Wlad will not have to go toe to toe. He will control the ring, hit him with a lot of jabs, and eventually hit him on the button with a crushing right. It may take a few of the to hit the spot, but I believe he will.

When he caught him in the 4th round of the first fight, Lamon will go down. Wlad throws is a lot less now, but throws it with twice the conviction now. If it hits the spot, the match is over.

Im not saying that Wlad isn't going to get tagged a long the way a few times, but I believe you will see the ref stop the fight after lamon gets up from the canvas after a stright right down the pipe.

Round 8 TKO

Gabriel R.
07-06-2007, 05:06 PM
No....that makes no sense still. You're saying that him going toe to toe would somehow equate that to being the best possible version of Brewster ever. Then you go on to say that this version of the best Brewster still couldn't beat Wlad. But if the best version couldn't....then how did the earlier version?

You probably have a different understanding of "the best Brewster" than I have. I say, he would have to have significantly improved if he wanted to go toe to toe with Wlad. That means, he would have to be better than before, even better than ever before. He would have to be the best Brewster ever. According to that definition, it is obviously possible that an earlier, worse version of Brewster could still defeat Wlad, as we all could see back in 2004. A worse version, because he couldn't go toe to toe with Wlad.

Cookie
07-06-2007, 05:46 PM
Brewster would be favoured to win a slugfest due to his superior durability. It would be much more sensible for Klitschko to box patiently and pick his shots, looking to land the big ones. Which he'll almost certainly do tomorrow night.

kg0208
07-06-2007, 06:04 PM
You probably have a different understanding of "the best Brewster" than I have. I say, he would have to have significantly improved if he wanted to go toe to toe with Wlad. That means, he would have to be better than before, even better than ever before. He would have to be the best Brewster ever. According to that definition, it is obviously possible that an earlier, worse version of Brewster could still defeat Wlad, as we all could see back in 2004. A worse version, because he couldn't go toe to toe with Wlad.

OK, but even then, if a worse version of Brewster by your own definition could beat Wlad, why would a better version of him, the best ever from what you're saying, lose to Wlad?

Mohak
07-06-2007, 06:04 PM
Brewster would be favoured to win a slugfest due to his superior durability. It would be much more sensible for Klitschko to box patiently and pick his shots, looking to land the big ones. Which he'll almost certainly do tomorrow night.

I agree with everything you said.

swedeone
07-06-2007, 06:06 PM
You probably have a different understanding of "the best Brewster" than I have. I say, he would have to have significantly improved if he wanted to go toe to toe with Wlad. That means, he would have to be better than before, even better than ever before. He would have to be the best Brewster ever. According to that definition, it is obviously possible that an earlier, worse version of Brewster could still defeat Wlad, as we all could see back in 2004. A worse version, because he couldn't go toe to toe with Wlad.



Ohhh of course. If Lamon is "significantly improved" over the Lamon that beat Wlad already, then he has a chance to win. That's makes all the sense in the world. :nut :rofl

If Lamon comes in "significantly improved" over the first Lamon, Wlad is getting carried out of the ring on a stretcher. Funny how people seem to casually forget that Lamon already kicked Wlad's ass. :-(

Bigcat
07-06-2007, 06:37 PM
Klitschko will Ko Brewster...................

liljp361
07-06-2007, 06:52 PM
That was against a few tomato cans... and not Lamon Brewster. I think if Lamon does not fight scared and goes after Wlad, he can hurt Wlad. If he fights on the outside and doesn't press the action and let his hands go, I agree with your prediction.

it doesnt matter...Klitschkos right hand will knock out just about any man....

Loufatski
07-06-2007, 08:08 PM
You know Lamon is going to be aggressive and come after Wlad. IF Wlad is baited into a slugfest, will be stay in there and trade? If so, and they go toe-to-toe... what happens? :bbb

Interesting.... :think

Lamen did nothing the last time he fought Wlad... until he hit the lottery.

KillerInstinct
07-06-2007, 08:18 PM
Ohhh of course. If Lamon is "significantly improved" over the Lamon that beat Wlad already, then he has a chance to win. That's makes all the sense in the world. :nut :rofl

If Lamon comes in "significantly improved" over the first Lamon, Wlad is getting carried out of the ring on a stretcher. Funny how people seem to casually forget that Lamon already kicked Wlad's ass. :-(

Such a ridiculous overstatement. Brewster showed amazing heart and chin in that fight, but there is no way he "kicked Wlad's ass". Wlad is able to hurt Brewster, a lot of people seem to forget how Wlad knocked him down with a 1-2 combination..which is what Klitschko will do tomorrow.

Max Molyneux
07-06-2007, 08:22 PM
If Brewster can't get on the inside, Wlad is gonna beat him. If he can get inside and stay there....then it becomes a different fight. Getting inside can be painful fighting Wlad. I think Wlad hits harder than Brewster.

Wlad will just hold If Lamon gets Inside and then the ref will just separate them.

kg0208
07-06-2007, 08:27 PM
Wlad will just hold If Lamon gets Inside and then the ref will just separate them.

That doesn't mean that Brewster won't go right back inside and launch a couple of shots before the ref can seperate them.

Loufatski
07-06-2007, 08:29 PM
That doesn't mean that Brewster won't go right back inside and launch a couple of shots before the ref can seperate them.

Right, because Wlad will let him do that.

kg0208
07-06-2007, 08:32 PM
Right, because Wlad will let him do that.

He doesn't have to LET him do anything. There are 2 men in the ring. If Brewster is determined to get inside, I think he certainly can.

If holding was the solution to stopping a fighter from landing punches on the inside, every fighter would do it. There are ways around it, and if Brewster is smart, he is training to deter it.

Loufatski
07-06-2007, 08:46 PM
He doesn't have to LET him do anything. There are 2 men in the ring. If Brewster is determined to get inside, I think he certainly can.

If holding was the solution to stopping a fighter from landing punches on the inside, every fighter would do it. There are ways around it, and if Brewster is smart, he is training to deter it.

Right, Brewster will probably outsmart Wlad.

swedeone
07-06-2007, 08:54 PM
Right, Brewster will probably outsmart Wlad.


You got it correct, finally. :yep

Mr "T"
07-06-2007, 08:56 PM
Wlads head will fly into 7th row. Brewster is unstoppable.
Where's your smug ass going to be Saturday night?

Sundance
07-06-2007, 08:59 PM
Right, Brewster will probably outsmart Wlad.


If it was a war based on respective IQ's I imagine Dr. Wlad would knock out Brewster and most other American heavies at the first bell :yep

Mr "T"
07-06-2007, 09:07 PM
Such a ridiculous overstatement. Brewster showed amazing heart and chin in that fight, but there is no way he "kicked Wlad's ass". Wlad is able to hurt Brewster, a lot of people seem to forget how Wlad knocked him down with a 1-2 combination..which is what Klitschko will do tomorrow.
And then some, all these posters that are coming out of the wood work, tell you one thing--they are scared! And they are looking for other "scared" posters to bolster them. The will not sleep well Saturday nite.

OBCboxer
07-06-2007, 09:10 PM
This is really a toss up, if Wlad stays on the outside and jabs he will win by UD. If Brewster mixes it up on the inside he wins by KO.

kg0208
07-06-2007, 09:15 PM
Right, Brewster will probably outsmart Wlad.

If outsmarting Wlad is the key to beating him.....well then he has been outsmarted by Brewster before.

You aren't exactly making a point now are you.

Loufatski
07-06-2007, 09:21 PM
If outsmarting Wlad is the key to beating him.....well then he has been outsmarted by Brewster before.

You aren't exactly making a point now are you.

Right, he will outsmart him again.