PDA

View Full Version : why do klitschko fans think we are suprised??


Relentless
07-07-2007, 07:28 PM
anyone who gave brewster half a chance is a fool, klitschko fans are making it like its was an 'in your face' 'i told you so' kinda win

eze
07-07-2007, 07:28 PM
You know how many people were picking Brewster by KO? More then half this board picked Wlad to lose.

Relentless
07-07-2007, 07:30 PM
were half the board rooting for brewster or were they actually picking brewster to win?

WiDDoW_MaKeR
07-07-2007, 07:30 PM
You know how many people were picking Brewster by KO? More then half this board picked Wlad to lose.
Couple that with the fact that before the fight was made, all of the Wlad haters on the board were saying that Wlad would never rematch Brewster because he knew he wouldn't win. Then... the fight is made and all of the sudden half of those guys change their tune in order to save face... and now it has sunken to acting like everyone knew Wladimir was going to win and Brewster is shot.

Pathetic.

Butch Coolidge
07-07-2007, 07:30 PM
anyone who gave brewster half a chance is a fool, klitschko fans are making it like its was an 'in your face' 'i told you so' kinda win

But Brewster beat him before.:scaredas:

lefthook31
07-07-2007, 07:31 PM
No offense to Klitshko fans, but a lot of them see him in the same way the delusional Tyson fans saw him at the end of his career. Unbeatable.
Fact is, it was a good win, but Brewster showed nothing, and a lot of that contributes to how much he has improved under Manny Steward, but i want to see how he does when he faces a guy who can get past his jab and make him fight a bit, like in the Peter fight. Those are the fights that make a fighter great, and unfortunately there isnt much out there. Bring on Holy!! :happy

eze
07-07-2007, 07:32 PM
Couple that with the fact that before the fight was made, all of the Wlad haters on the board were saying that Wlad would never rematch Brewster because he knew he wouldn't win. Then... the fight is made and all of the sudden half of those guys change their tune in order to save face... and now it has sunken to acting like everyone knew Wladimir was going to win and Brewster is shot.

Pathetic.

Exactly it is pathetic. People dont want to look like fools so they change around what they said.

Shotgun
07-07-2007, 07:32 PM
anyone who gave brewster half a chance is a fool, klitschko fans are making it like its was an 'in your face' 'i told you so' kinda win

It's too bad a bunch of the threads from a few months ago got deleted. There were a lot of people saying that it was a near certainty that Brewster win the fight

RUSKULL
07-07-2007, 07:33 PM
Relentless, take a note from Mr. Magic. He gave credit where credit is due. You only stated that Brewster wasn't a challenge because you knew Brewster would lose & wanted to downplay the victory...................admit it!

Relentless
07-07-2007, 07:33 PM
Couple that with the fact that before the fight was made, all of the Wlad haters on the board were saying that Wlad would never rematch Brewster because he knew he wouldn't win. Then... the fight is made and all of the sudden half of those guys change their tune in order to save face... and now it has sunken to acting like everyone knew Wladimir was going to win and Brewster is shot.

Pathetic.

are you saying i didn't think wlad was going to win?? read my old posts cockboy, i have been saying this for ages, i also believe wlad will bat every top heavyweight today exept for chagaev.

Relentless
07-07-2007, 07:34 PM
Relentless, take a note from Mr. Magic. He gave credit where credit is due. You only stated that Brewster wasn't a challenge because you knew Brewster would lose & wanted to downplay the victory...................admit it!

wlad gets my respect for having the balls to challenge brewser after what happened the first fight, but why do you think we are surprised?

WiDDoW_MaKeR
07-07-2007, 07:35 PM
are you saying i didn't think wlad was going to win?? read my old posts cockboy, i have been saying this for ages, i also believe wlad will bat every top heavyweight today exept for chagaev.
Grow up little man. I really don't care about your thoughts on anything. I was refering the Wlad haters in general. If you consider yourself among that group, than that is your own issue.

RUSKULL
07-07-2007, 07:36 PM
No offense to Klitshko fans, but a lot of them see him in the same way the delusional Tyson fans saw him at the end of his career. Unbeatable.
Fact is, it was a good win, but Brewster showed nothing, and a lot of that contributes to how much he has improved under Manny Steward, but i want to see how he does when he faces a guy who can get past his jab and make him fight a bit, like in the Peter fight. Those are the fights that make a fighter great, and unfortunately there isnt much out there. Bring on Holy!! :happy

Wladimir would beatup Holyfield at this stage. Bring on Peter since obviously everyone forgot how easily WK outpointed him last time..............

Wlad will KO Peter this time, mark my words.............Manny & Wladimir knew they had the fight in the bag so they didn't pursue the KO the first time but watch that fuckin' jab this time. :deal

Mr "T"
07-07-2007, 07:38 PM
But Brewster beat him before.:scaredas:
This fight really stirs the conspiracy theory tht WLAD was drugged in the first fight. I mean he owned Brew, just like the first 4 rounds in the first fight..Of course, we can let that die because it is for the better for all of us-- we saw the real champ tonite., and Brew knows who that is.

WiDDoW_MaKeR
07-07-2007, 07:38 PM
wlad gets my respect for having the balls to challenge brewser after what happened the first fight, but why do you think we are surprised?
Who the fuck is "we"? Are you trying to be a representative for this board? There were several people claiming that Wlad would lose... that is who the posts are obviously directed at. What sort of complex, or attention problem do you have that makes you think all of the posts on this board are directed at you?

If you called Wlad to dominate Brewster, then why the hell are you acting like people expect you to be suprised?

I would guess that the "In your face" attitude that you are picking up on has to do with the 3 years of trash talking on Wladimir for his loss to Brewster, and the fact that their was no rematch. Now, he is vindicated.

RUSKULL
07-07-2007, 07:40 PM
are you saying i didn't think wlad was going to win?? read my old posts cockboy, i have been saying this for ages, i also believe wlad will bat every top heavyweight today exept for chagaev.

Cockboy?! Lameeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee.....................................:-(

Rock0052
07-07-2007, 07:41 PM
Personally, I don't care if people want or pick Wlad to lose- fans can cheer for whoever they please for whatever reason.

It's the whole charade that irritates me- how it almost always starts with "Wlad doesn't want to fight him!", which leads into "He's going to destroy Wlad!" once the fight's signed, and ends up with "This guy was a bum/washed up/overrated anyways, Wlad beating him just proves how shitty the division is. I knew Wlad would win"

I'm not saying that about anyone in particular, but I've seen enough of the posts to notice the trend. Shit, if you're going to back whoever's fighting Wlad, at least show the respect to that guy and stick with him.

Relentless
07-07-2007, 07:41 PM
Who the fuck is "we"? Are you trying to be a representative for this board? There were several people claiming that Wlad would lose... that is who the posts are obviously directed at. What sort of complex, or attention problem do you have that makes you think all of the posts on this board are directed at you?

If you called Wlad to dominate Brewster, then why the hell are you acting like people expect you to be suprised?

I would guess that the "In your face" attitude that you are picking up on has to do with the 3 years of trash talking on Wladimir for his loss to Brewster, and the fact that their was no rematch. Now, he is vindicated.

i was always called a klitschko hater, so when somebody says something about klitschko haters i assume they are talking about me.

i never once said wlad needs to avenge his losses, what would it prove if he beats ross purity and corry sanders now?

WiDDoW_MaKeR
07-07-2007, 07:42 PM
Cockboy?! Lameeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee.....................................:-(
The loser obviously watched Harold and Kumar too many times.:lol: Great movie though. Relentless has a complex as if every post is directed at him for some reason. However, I know speaking for myself that he is never on my mind when I am making a post.

T.S.
07-07-2007, 07:43 PM
Cockboy?! Lameeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee.....................................:-(

Geezus I told this kid if he wanted to sound tough not to use words like "Cockboy" :patsch
Next thing ya know he'll accuse you of having a "Hissy Fit".:lol:

WiDDoW_MaKeR
07-07-2007, 07:44 PM
i was always called a klitschko hater, so when somebody says something about klitschko haters i assume they are talking about me.

i never once said wlad needs to avenge his losses, what would it prove if he beats ross purity and corry sanders now?
Once again.. if that is your stance, then stop acting like those posts are directed at you. Pretty simple.

What would it prove for Wlad to beat Puritty or Sanders now? Nothing to me because I already know that he is much better than they ever could dream of being. Outside of the fact that we already have people saying he needs to rematch Sanders. So, obviously it would be proving doubters wrong. However, I see no need for that as his career has surpassed where he was before, and there is no need to go backwards or sideways. Keep pushing forward, and beat the best.

He can no longer be defined by his losses.

Relentless
07-07-2007, 07:44 PM
The loser obviously watched Harold and Kumar too many times.:lol: Great movie though. Relentless has a complex as if every post is directed at him for some reason. However, I know speaking for myself that he is never on my mind when I am making a post.

you're right harold and kumar was a good movie:yep

how about cock jockey?

RUSKULL
07-07-2007, 07:45 PM
i was always called a klitschko hater, so when somebody says something about klitschko haters i assume they are talking about me.

i never once said wlad needs to avenge his losses, what would it prove if he beats ross purity and corry sanders now?

You have a point with Purrity since he's no longer active but Sanders wants a comeback and Wlad should give him a voluntary just to beat the guy who beat him. If Sanders strings together a couple of decent wins that is............

Relentless
07-07-2007, 07:46 PM
You have a point with Purrity since he's no longer active but Sanders wants a comeback and Wlad should give him a voluntary just to beat the guy who beat him. If Sanders strings together a couple of decent wins that is............

beating sanders is nothing,

he needs to move on and face the other champs, the only fighter who has a chance to beat him is chagaev, that would be a good fight.

RUSKULL
07-07-2007, 07:47 PM
you're right harold and kumar was a good movie:yep

how about cock jockey?


Cock Jockey is a bit better.but not much, at least it sounds original!

RUSKULL
07-07-2007, 07:48 PM
beating sanders is nothing,

he needs to move on and face the other champs, the only fighter who has a chance to beat him is chagaev, that would be a good fight.

You are correct. Unification is the next step for Wlad IMO too. Cahgaev is the only guy that really has a chance too, although Sultan is a lefty & we all know how Sanders the southpaw did against Wlad :yikes

Relentless
07-07-2007, 07:49 PM
sultan is nothing, audley harrison could have beaten briggs.

AJAX
07-07-2007, 07:51 PM
The bottom line is nobody has stopped brewster like that before, Wlad proved he can beat a big puncher with a good chin, hell he already beat Peter the great, but yet still people shit on him like it's not enough.

AJAX
07-07-2007, 07:51 PM
sultan is nothing, audley harrison could have beaten briggs.

you still make one stupid post after another!!

Irländsk
07-07-2007, 07:54 PM
No offense to Klitshko fans, but a lot of them see him in the same way the delusional Tyson fans saw him at the end of his career. Unbeatable.
Fact is, it was a good win, but Brewster showed nothing, and a lot of that contributes to how much he has improved under Manny Steward, but i want to see how he does when he faces a guy who can get past his jab and make him fight a bit, like in the Peter fight. Those are the fights that make a fighter great, and unfortunately there isnt much out there. Bring on Holy!! :happyWasn't Lamon meant to get past wlad's jab and make him work??Fact is Brewster showed nothing because Wlad never allowed him to, we all know Brewster is not one to quit, he was just extremely outclassed tonight. And i hope you're not serious about holyfield, unless you want to see him die in the ring.

oblate
07-08-2007, 01:36 AM
anyone who gave brewster half a chance is a fool, klitschko fans are making it like its was an 'in your face' 'i told you so' kinda win
i'm a wlad fan and i knew he will beat brewster but there were a lot of people who said that brewster will crush wlad agian and other saying brewster has wlads number :rofl . anyway if you look at posts prior to the fight you will see that there were many posters who made it sound like brewster will knock wlad out.