PDA

View Full Version : Which will be the better wins? in 2008


Vincent Gottschalk
01-30-2008, 09:26 PM
IF Chad Dawson beats....
# 1 Glen Johnson
# 2 Antonio Taver vs Clinton Woods winner
# 3 Adrian Diaconu
Or
If Kelly Pavlik beats....
# 1 Jermain Taylor
# 2 John Duddy
# 3 Arthur Abraham

eze
01-30-2008, 09:26 PM
Pavlik

Rickypr18
01-30-2008, 09:33 PM
IF Chad Dawson beats....
# 1 Glen Johnson
# 2 Antonio Taver vs Clinton Woods winner
# 3 Adrian Diaconu
Or
If Kelly Pavlik beats....
# 1 Jermain Taylor
# 2 John Duddy
# 3 Arthur Abraham
Pavlik by far.

RealIzm
01-30-2008, 09:41 PM
Pavliks victories here are the most predictable
Dawson's bouts spell nothing but trouble when it comes to a hungry Adrian Diaconu or an aging warrior in Glen Johnson
So my pick? If Dawson wins the 3 above listed fights convincingly he's the easy winner here for better and more difficult wins

RICH
01-30-2008, 09:43 PM
pavlik for sure.

albeziel
01-30-2008, 09:49 PM
Pavlik without a doubt

BigReg
01-30-2008, 09:50 PM
IF Chad Dawson beats....
# 1 Glen Johnson
# 2 Antonio Taver vs Clinton Woods winner
# 3 Adrian Diaconu
Or
If Kelly Pavlik beats....
# 1 Jermain Taylor
# 2 John Duddy
# 3 Arthur Abraham

Dawson. If he wins all three, he would've beaten a tough contender, a legitimate champ, and the number 1 challenger to his title.

If Pavlik wins all three, he would've beaten a guy he already KO'd, a hype job who struggled with old ass Yori Boy Campas, and a paper champ who should've lost to another hype job that Pavlik already destroyed.

mrplow182
01-30-2008, 09:55 PM
If woods beats tarver then youd have to think dawson would have to fight woods in england cos he's the bigger name and a titlist.....this in itself means dawson wouldnt fancy it

if pavlik beats taylor again and stops duddy then heck, even i will stop questioning his legitimacy

Kostya Zoo
01-30-2008, 09:59 PM
Dawson. If he wins all three, he would've beaten a tough contender, a legitimate champ, and the number 1 challenger to his title.

If Pavlik wins all three, he would've beaten a guy he already KO'd, a hype job who struggled with old ass Yori Boy Campas, and a paper champ who should've lost to another hype job that Pavlik already destroyed.

I don't think there's much that Dawson can do to do better than Pavlik this year just because his division is a mess. Johnson and Tarver are past their primes. Tarver's gonna be 40 this year. Why are these guys still fighting? Diaconu is a legit contender so I think that's a good fight. The division is old and shallow, and the recognized champion is holding it hostage.

mrplow182
01-30-2008, 10:26 PM
Calzaghe if he beats Hopkins and then Jones Jr will have the best record of the year and that isnt an impossible outcome.....I still really wanna see a Pavlik vs Kessler fight too!

TheGrimReaper
01-30-2008, 10:40 PM
john duddy is nothing

PH|LLA
01-30-2008, 10:58 PM
in that scenario Pavlik edges out Dawson just slightly

Chunk
01-30-2008, 11:27 PM
dawson if he wins all three...although pavlick beating taylor is better on H2H than any of the dawson would be wins

brooklyn1550
01-30-2008, 11:27 PM
Kelly Pavlik because a win over Arthur Abraham is better than a win over Johnson, Woods/Tarver, or Diaconu.

sdsfinest22
01-30-2008, 11:52 PM
IF Chad Dawson beats....
# 1 Glen Johnson
# 2 Antonio Taver vs Clinton Woods winner
# 3 Adrian Diaconu
Or
If Kelly Pavlik beats....
# 1 Jermain Taylor
# 2 John Duddy
# 3 Arthur Abraham

pavlik....only 1 loss between those 3 fighters...that says alot in itself..plus 1 is a title holder and 1 is a former title holder...i still think duddy is garbage though