View Full Version : pavlik taylor on setanta
stuey
02-16-2008, 05:25 AM
its a set the alarm job.
any idea what time the fight starts? uk time?
Jetset78
02-16-2008, 05:37 AM
Dont know if they're showing the undercard
stuey
02-16-2008, 05:44 AM
the programe starts at 2 am, but i just wanna watch the main event tonight.
dwilson
02-16-2008, 06:27 AM
Definetly get the alarm set up for this one. Well done setanta.
GazOC
02-16-2008, 06:28 AM
Theres a repeat at noon of just the main event.
dan-b
02-16-2008, 06:35 AM
Is everyone staying up for this then? I was thinking of sky plussing it & watching it early morning but if everyone else is staying up I guess I have to as well.:lol:
GazOC
02-16-2008, 06:38 AM
I'm staying up, I've got a sporting extravaganza planned for tonight. Arsenal-ManU, Valuev - Lak and then Pavlik-Taylor.
dwilson
02-16-2008, 06:41 AM
Great day for sport. I am gonna be so fucking tired tomorrow.
stuey
02-16-2008, 06:42 AM
i am out boozing, so will get back and try not to pass out......
i need to put some kind of booze lock on my keyboard, i will be posting all manner of shit tonight:yep
GazOC
02-16-2008, 06:44 AM
i am out boozing, so will get back and try not to pass out......
You'll fall asleep mate, I've tried it many times and never seen the main event...:D
stuey
02-16-2008, 07:01 AM
You'll fall asleep mate, I've tried it many times and never seen the main event...:D
probably. will try to avoid finding out the result till the midday re run...
dan-b
02-16-2008, 07:42 AM
Valuev - Lak
Where are you watching this?
GazOC
02-16-2008, 08:01 AM
[Only registered and activated users can see links]
Smith
02-16-2008, 08:05 AM
i am out boozing, so will get back and try not to pass out......
i need to put some kind of booze lock on my keyboard, i will be posting all manner of shit tonight:yep:lol:Pretty much sums up exactly how my night will be.
dan-b
02-16-2008, 08:32 AM
[Only registered and activated users can see links] ([Only registered and activated users can see links])
Cheers.:good
I've heard you can view it here as well just in case.
[Only registered and activated users can see links]
GazOC
02-16-2008, 08:49 AM
Ta, its always nice to have a backup with streams!!
Jack Dempsey
02-16-2008, 01:01 PM
Staying up, my Sky + is fucked
Max Molyneux
02-16-2008, 01:14 PM
Sweet, I can sleep then get up for the main event then sleep again.
GazOC
02-16-2008, 04:59 PM
Well, I've had my nap hopefully I'll be able stick it out until the fight.
Benjiabc
02-16-2008, 05:19 PM
thank god someone finally tells me a site thats showing the fight. cheers lads:good
hitman_hatton1
02-17-2008, 08:59 AM
what did u think then guys??
close fight for 10 rds.
i had it level with 2 to go.
but pavlik closed well.
hurt taylor in the 11th and outworked him in the 12 to bring it on home.
taylor can come again against the likes of miranda, froch, bute, kessler etc.
i say bring on pavlik-tito. :bbb better than a duddy fight anyway.
joekirkbycobra
02-17-2008, 10:52 AM
what did u think then guys??
close fight for 10 rds.
i had it level with 2 to go.
but pavlik closed well.
hurt taylor in the 11th and outworked him in the 12 to bring it on home.
taylor can come again against the likes of miranda, froch, bute, kessler etc.
i say bring on pavlik-tito. :bbb better than a duddy fight anyway.
draw for me
taylor v froch id love to see
tito past it, best figh would be for pavlik to fight winky but thats not even in the picture
stuey
02-17-2008, 12:29 PM
I agree pavlik won, 115-113, primarily because of the 11th (hard body shot took Taylor out of it) and 12th.
I still think Pavlik is mediocre and he looked pedestrian beside an equally mediocre fighter in Taylor.
same scorline here, i reckon pavlik is pretty good though. he works well of the jab and is busy throughout the twelve, obviously has good power too.
Max Molyneux
02-17-2008, 01:07 PM
Had It a draw.
I thought Taylor's boxing ability was better though.
Pavlik's an aggressive come forward guy who wouldn't be good enough without his size at Middleweight. Not hard to hit either.
i had this as a narrow win for pavlik.
pavlik should stay down at middleweight and try to unify, and taylor will be a welcome addition to an increasingly strong supermiddleweight division.
kessler-bute-froch-lacy-miranda-pascal-mundine and now taylor
steelem
02-17-2008, 03:23 PM
pavlik won that 2 rounds plus - his gonna hold that title for a while ild say
mike464
02-17-2008, 03:54 PM
Had it 115-113 Pavlik. Setanta are so crap. Why didn't they start the show earlier and how us the Navarro-Mijares fight from the start? That's what Sky would have done.
GazOC
02-17-2008, 03:57 PM
It may be unfair but Taylor always looks like he could be doing a lot more if only he could be arsed.
steelem
02-17-2008, 03:59 PM
i was lucky i got up at 3:30 this morning & it was about 5 mins away ..
steelem
02-17-2008, 03:59 PM
It may be unfair but Taylor always looks like he could be doing a lot more if only he could be arsed.
never liked taylor though gaz - your right lazy boxer
Claypole
02-17-2008, 04:45 PM
I could not believe how bad the commentators were. One of them was punch drunk, and the other one was just a bit too camp for my liking.
Setanta do the absolute bare minimum they can possibly get away with.
GazOC
02-17-2008, 04:50 PM
Claypole, thats exactly what I thought. He sounded like a right 'one'...camp as a row of tents.
The other guy was Ray Mancini, did you catch the bit where he said he thought Pavlik may tire in the 3rd half of the fight???
I could not believe how bad the commentators were. One of them was punch drunk, and the other one was just a bit too camp for my liking.
Setanta do the absolute bare minimum they can possibly get away with.
i don't get why hbo provide different commentators for the overseas feed.
Dunky McCafferty
02-17-2008, 05:52 PM
Well, I havent read the general forum yet, but did anyone else from these shores think that Taylor did enough to win that fight? Or was it just me?
Claypole
02-17-2008, 05:58 PM
The other guy was Ray Mancini, did you catch the bit where he said he thought Pavlik may tire in the 3rd half of the fight???I remember Ray Mancini. The only bits I could make out were "believe me" and "Let me tell ya"
I reckon they got the other guy from a hair salon in L.A. Truth is, it was still better than Bunce grunting and groaning.
Claypole
02-17-2008, 06:03 PM
Well, I havent read the general forum yet, but did anyone else from these shores think that Taylor did enough to win that fight? Or was it just me?I thought it was a hard fight to score. Taylor threw better looking punches, and a fair few of them. Was it enough though? I Not for me, but if Taylor got the decision it wouldn't be the worst call ever.
GazOC
02-17-2008, 06:20 PM
Depends how you scored the aggression, there were quite a few 10/10 rounds that would have been given to Pavlik based purely on coming forward.
GazOC
02-17-2008, 07:37 PM
but pavlik's agression was generally hitting Taylor's gloves and Taylor was getting through.
Just a style preference thing there.
Yep, thats what I'm saying. It wasn't 'effective aggression' but it may have been better than no aggression in the judges eyes?
puremental2
02-17-2008, 07:47 PM
i had it 115 - 112 pavlik
Dunky McCafferty
02-17-2008, 08:10 PM
I thought it was a hard fight to score. Taylor threw better looking punches, and a fair few of them. Was it enough though? I Not for me, but if Taylor got the decision it wouldn't be the worst call ever.
Thats the thing, I thought Taylor was excellent. great jab, lightning left hook exploding on Pavliks face time & again, nice bodywork, whilst pavlik was walking forward & doing well with his jab, but not much else. Pavlik was methodical & does exactly what it says on the tin.
But Taylor aprt from when he got caught with a beautiful right to the solar plexus in the 11th I thought out thought a determined but limited Pavlik.
I normally favour the aggressor in fights, but Taylor IMO did more than enough to edge a points decision.
The Lads
02-18-2008, 09:53 AM
I'd had a few... was there really bizzare scoring on one undercard fight?
The Lads
02-18-2008, 09:56 AM
Found it. The Mijares fight.
One judge had it 120-108 Navarro. The other 2 judges had it 117-111 & 115-113 MIjares
wtf?
Dunky McCafferty
02-18-2008, 10:08 AM
Found it. The Mijares fight.
One judge had it 120-108 Navarro. The other 2 judges had it 117-111 & 115-113 MIjares
wtf?
The boxing writer Mike Katz was supposed to have said that the scoring was the worst he had ever seen in all his years in the sport. I didnt see the fight myself.
Was away over the weekend so haven't seen the fight yet.
Did tip Pavlik to win in one of the threads beforehand - look forward to watching a recording of the bout and will attempt to score it.
vBulletin® v3.8.0, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.