View Full Version : Pacquiao vs. the ATGS in "The Ring"
KobeIsGod
06-18-2007, 09:58 PM
In the most recent The Ring magazine, they did a really great analysis of how Pacman would stack up against the very best 130 pounders of all-time. As a huge Pac fan, i thought it was interesting but it seemed the general consensus was Pacman's constant attacking style would play right into the hands of the slicker atgs. I'm interested what the classic experts here think of Ring's predictions?
Pac vs.
1-Kid Chocolate 136-19-6 (51) > Chocolate by close decision
2-Henry Armstrong 151-21-9 (101) > In a war, Armstrong by late ko
3-Willie Pep :admin 230-11-1 (65) > Pep by comfortable decision
4-Sandy Saddler 144-16-2 (103) > Saddler by mid-round stoppage
5-Flash Elorde 86-27-2 (33) > Pacman by comfortable decision
6-Vicente Saldivar 38-3 (27) > Pacman by ko in 10
7-Ruben Oliveras 88-13-3 (78 > Pacman, late, on cuts
8-Bobby Chacon 59-7-1 (47) > Pacman by TKO after 10
9-Salvador Sanchez 44-1-1 (32) > Sanchez on cuts
10-Azuman Nelson 39-5-2 (27 > Nelson comfortable decision or late stoppage
brimey
06-18-2007, 10:04 PM
Did this issue just come out? I didn't see this article.
KobeIsGod
06-18-2007, 10:10 PM
Did this issue just come out? I didn't see this article.
Yeah. I got it today. Its the September issue Pages 72-79. Why does Ring date it so far ahead though? :think
salsanchezfan
06-18-2007, 10:14 PM
Where is Arguello?
I see Arguello taking him out, but not before being troubled (perhaps dropped) early. Arguello's class and straight punching do it eventually, though.
KobeIsGod
06-18-2007, 10:16 PM
How bout Mayweather at 130 and Camacho?
I wondered the same thing. It looks like they leave out the more contemporary 130 pounders. It seems to be organized chronologically by their featherweight reigns. First was Kid Chocolate (1932-1934) and the last was Nelson (1984-1988) Since Arguello was in the early 80's i guess that's not how they came up with the list. Strange they left him off.
seb melmoth
06-18-2007, 11:00 PM
Mayweather is the greatest 130 lbs fighter ever, and he would school Pacman in that weight class.
Sizzle
06-19-2007, 12:26 AM
Mayweather Vs Pacquiao would not be pretty for the Filipino community.
As Steward says, "Pacquiao doesn't actually box, he just moves around the ring."
And we all know Pacquiao only has one good punch to defend against.
He'd be outboxed and stopped late.
I think the Ring predictions are alright.
sweet_scientist
06-19-2007, 02:45 AM
Surprised he got picked over Saldivar and Olivares, I don't see that at all.
Amsterdam
06-19-2007, 02:55 AM
Where is Arguello?
I see Arguello taking him out, but not before being troubled (perhaps dropped) early. Arguello's class and straight punching do it eventually, though.
Arguello's great chin>Pac's power.
I don't see him getting dropped and I see Arguello demolishing him.
Amsterdam
06-19-2007, 02:56 AM
Mayweather Vs Pacquiao would not be pretty for the Filipino community.
As Steward says, "Pacquiao doesn't actually box, he just moves around the ring."
And we all know Pacquiao only has one good punch to defend against.
He'd be outboxed and stopped late.
I think the Ring predictions are alright.
Mayweather could hit decent at 130 and 135, he'd stop Pacquaio after a one sided boxing display. But a guy like Arguello is the type that I'd pick to beat Floyd comfortable, which is why I see him having no trouble with Pac.
jyuza
06-19-2007, 03:35 AM
Pacman would be easily beat by Olivares.
Arguello would destroy him too.
The Morlocks
12-08-2009, 03:38 PM
Where is Arguello?
I see Arguello taking him out, but not before being troubled (perhaps dropped) early. Arguello's class and straight punching do it eventually, though.
I think Arguello ko's him too. WAAAYYYY too much power:hat
ricardoparker93
12-08-2009, 04:08 PM
Pac is getting KO'd in all of his fantasy match ups again...
Mantequilla
12-08-2009, 04:21 PM
They picked him to win almost half of the fights...
Bill Butcher
12-08-2009, 04:27 PM
In the most recent The Ring magazine, they did a really great analysis of how Pacman would stack up against the very best 130 pounders of all-time. As a huge Pac fan, i thought it was interesting but it seemed the general consensus was Pacman's constant attacking style would play right into the hands of the slicker atgs. I'm interested what the classic experts here think of Ring's predictions?
Pac vs.
1-Kid Chocolate 136-19-6 (51) > Chocolate by close decision
2-Henry Armstrong 151-21-9 (101) > In a war, Armstrong by late ko
3-Willie Pep :admin 230-11-1 (65) > Pep by comfortable decision
4-Sandy Saddler 144-16-2 (103) > Saddler by mid-round stoppage
5-Flash Elorde 86-27-2 (33) > Pacman by comfortable decision
6-Vicente Saldivar 38-3 (27) > Pacman by ko in 10
7-Ruben Oliveras 88-13-3 (78 > Pacman, late, on cuts
8-Bobby Chacon 59-7-1 (47) > Pacman by TKO after 10
9-Salvador Sanchez 44-1-1 (32) > Sanchez on cuts
10-Azuman Nelson 39-5-2 (27 > Nelson comfortable decision or late stoppage
Why the :admin next to Pep v Pac ? :huh
anarci
12-09-2009, 11:16 AM
i kind of agree with most of this list,but i dont think Nelson wins comfortably,in fact id take Pac over Nelson by a close decision. Although at feather id take Azumah,Nelsons resume was better at 130 but i think 126 was his prime weight. im not so sure if Chocolate beats him either.
What about Chavez? arguably the greatest JL of all time along with Arguello and Mayweather,and i dont remember Olivares ever fighting at JL? This looks more like a 126 list to me. Saldivar too
PowerPuncher
12-09-2009, 11:17 AM
You need a very good right hand to beat Pacquaio if you don't have 1 you lose, if you have 1 you don't necessarily win, you also need to be pretty quick, and being a good counter puncher with a good defense will help
TommyV
12-09-2009, 11:27 AM
i kind of agree with most of this list,but i dont think Nelson wins comfortably,in fact id take Pac over Nelson by a close decision. Although at feather id take Azumah,Nelsons resume was better at 130 but i think 126 was his prime weight. im not so sure if Chocolate beats him either.
What about Chavez? arguably the greatest JL of all time along with Arguello and Mayweather,and i dont remember Olivares ever fighting at JL? This looks more like a 126 list to me. Saldivar too
This list is from 2 years ago, that's why.
PowerPuncher
12-09-2009, 11:33 AM
In the most recent The Ring magazine, they did a really great analysis of how Pacman would stack up against the very best 130 pounders of all-time. As a huge Pac fan, i thought it was interesting but it seemed the general consensus was Pacman's constant attacking style would play right into the hands of the slicker atgs. I'm interested what the classic experts here think of Ring's predictions?
Pac vs.
1-Kid Chocolate 136-19-6 (51) > Chocolate by close decision
2-Henry Armstrong 151-21-9 (101) > In a war, Armstrong by late ko
3-Willie Pep :admin 230-11-1 (65) > Pep by comfortable decision
4-Sandy Saddler 144-16-2 (103) > Saddler by mid-round stoppage
5-Flash Elorde 86-27-2 (33) > Pacman by comfortable decision
6-Vicente Saldivar 38-3 (27) > Pacman by ko in 10
7-Ruben Oliveras 88-13-3 (78 > Pacman, late, on cuts
8-Bobby Chacon 59-7-1 (47) > Pacman by TKO after 10
9-Salvador Sanchez 44-1-1 (32) > Sanchez on cuts
10-Azuman Nelson 39-5-2 (27 > Nelson comfortable decision or late stoppage
1. Havent seen enough of him
2. Pacquaio's faster straighter shots land first, he has the reach advantage too, Pac widish UD
3. Pep UD probably by countering and using lateral movement - is it same day weigh in rules, if Pac gets 24/36 hour weigh ins he'll come in the ring at 140lbs and be too big/strong for PEp but on the same day Pep most likely takes it, Pac has a punchers chance though
4. Pac UD in a war
5. Havent seen enough of him
6. Pac UD maybe late stoppage, too short and too left hand reliant imo
7. Pacman late KO
8. Pacman late ko
9. Sanchez UD - outboxes Pac in a war
10. Pacman UD
TommyV
12-09-2009, 11:38 AM
Sorry PP, but I entirely disagree with picks #2 & 4. I think Pac gets knocked out on both occasions.
PowerPuncher
12-09-2009, 01:02 PM
Sorry PP, but I entirely disagree with picks #2 & 4. I think Pac gets knocked out on both occasions.
Both are slower without particularly good right hands or countering skills, which I think you need to beat Pacquaio. Armstrong I give a better chance to because he can bob and weave his way inside, maybe make Pac miss and turn it into an inside fight, Saddler is easier to hit and seriously left hook happy, which is a no no against Pac, I'd put serious money on Pac if they fought
Mantequilla
12-09-2009, 01:08 PM
Backing pac up is the quickest way to success at this weight imo.I actually thnk Armstrong matches up really well with him, probably the most one sided of all these fights.Can't see pac putting enough leather on him to stop his advance.Hank was a viscious puncher at this weight too.
vBulletin® v3.8.0, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.