Dwight Davidson vs Mustafa Hamsho

[Titan1]

If these top two middleweights had to fight in 1981-1982, could Dwight use his skills to keep Mustafa off him?

[redrooster]

i've often wondered this myself but have never been able to decide. i suppose the motivation of Dwight would be a factor. Too close to call

[TBooze]

Best ask Parker or Scypion...

I remember Davidson from the Sibson fight... hence my pick:

Hamsho WS10.

[Tony]

I think Davison had the physical tools to beat Hamsho, but not the energy.

Hamsho by split decision, and viewers are left just as they were after Sibson-Davison: wondering what would have happened if Dwight had stepped up the pace a bit.

[Duodenum]

Hamsho takes this decision. He proved against Minter that he could deal with Dwight's physical strength. There's no way Davison would outhustle Mustafa. Additionally, Hamsho's a southpaw, and an extremely rugged one. The Hamsho who shut out Benitez decisions the Davison who dropped Curtis Parker from the unbeatens.

[la-califa]

Mustafa would be too busy for Davison. Dwight would only fight as hard as he had to. Mustafa was always busy & as the rounds pile up, Davison would not be able to knock out Mustafa to pull out the victory.

[ThinBlack]

Toss-up, but at least Mustafa rose to the occasion in bigger fights, so I'm going with him to win a majority decision based on his workrate.If Dwight fought up to his potential, it would go the other way.

[SLAKKA]

the syrain buzzaw could certanlly do what tony sibson did