Who do you have rated higher P4P

[quintonjacksonfan]

Hagler or Hearns. Hagler beat Heanrs at his natural weight but

he also beat Duran who everyone has higher then Hagler P4P

Hearns knocked out Geraldo in 1 who went the distance with Hagler

Hearns Knocked out Duran in 2 rounds who also went the distance with

Hagler. I though Hearns looked more impressive in his two fights

with Leonard then Hagler did. Take away common opponents and

Hearns 3 biggest wins over Cuevas,Hill,and Wilfredo in my opinion

are better then Hagler 3 biggest wins

[Robbi]

Hagler or Hearns. Hagler beat Heanrs at his natural weight but

he also beat Duran who everyone has higher then Hagler P4P

Hearns knocked out Geraldo in 1 who went the distance with Hagler

Hearns Knocked out Duran in 2 rounds who also went the distance with

Hagler. I though Hearns looked more impressive in his two fights

with Leonard then Hagler did. Take away common opponents and

Hearns 3 biggest wins over Cuevas,Hill,and Wilfredo in my opinion

are better then Hagler 3 biggest wins


I rate Hagler higher based on his longevity at the top.

[Street Lethal]

Hearns had weaknesses, Hagler didn't until he aged.

This sums it up.

[NickHudson]

I think Hearns is one of the toughest guys to rate.

His combination of speed, grace and power is close to unique in boxing history, IMO.

But, he had a couple of glaring weaknesses, unusual for someone who is rated so highly by most of us...

I personally think he was a fighting genius, and its a good job he didn't have a granite chin as then we would have no P4P debates on ESB...

[SchweitzerMan]

Hearns is my favourite boxer. I am curious why you have the wins over Wildredo Benitez and Virgil Hill over the knockout of Roberto Duran

[Manassa]

Hearns, wherever he fought, was always second best. Hagler was the man to avoid for some time, and then he became king.

[Marnoff]

I think Hearns is one of the toughest guys to rate.

His combination of speed, grace and power is close to unique in boxing history, IMO.

But, he had a couple of glaring weaknesses, unusual for someone who is rated so highly by most of us...

I personally think he was a fighting genius, and its a good job he didn't have a granite chin as then we would have no P4P debates on ESB...

Agreed.

[Fab2333]

I think Hearns is one of the toughest guys to rate.

His combination of speed, grace and power is close to unique in boxing history, IMO.

But, he had a couple of glaring weaknesses, unusual for someone who is rated so highly by most of us...

I personally think he was a fighting genius, and its a good job he didn't have a granite chin as then we would have no P4P debates on ESB...
:good

[brooklyn1550]

I rate Hagler higher based on his longevity at the top.

:good