PDA

View Full Version : would ricky hatton have beat floyd if it wasnt 4 the referee?


glscotland
04-09-2008, 06:01 PM
who will win if the ref wasnt biased?

KO Boxing
04-09-2008, 06:03 PM
:lol:

Another one? This has been done a million times. Simple answer = NO.

For YOUR sake, I really do hope your trolling... With Scotland in your name, though, I'm assuming your British... And you never know with you lot and your fighters!

It's damn threads and thought processes like these that will lead to Hatton-Floyd 2 in England over Floyd-Cotto :-(

Relentless
04-09-2008, 06:05 PM
HELL NO!

when will hatton fans learn hatton is not any good at welter, anyone in the top 15 at welterweight would have hattons ass.

glscotland
04-09-2008, 06:08 PM
floyd wouldnt beat hatton at light welter as hatton would send a castillo lik body punch and he would be out 4 the count.

Relentless
04-09-2008, 06:09 PM
floyd wouldnt beat hatton at light welter as hatton would send a castillo lik body punch and he would be out 4 the count.

:rofl :rofl

you dont know shit about boxing!

Mikey
04-09-2008, 06:09 PM
floyd wouldnt beat hatton at light welter as hatton would send a castillo lik body punch and he would be out 4 the count.

Thats why Hatton ducked him twice at light welter then. :lol:

KO Boxing
04-09-2008, 06:15 PM
floyd wouldnt beat hatton at light welter as hatton would send a castillo lik body punch and he would be out 4 the count.
Oh dear, your being serious.

:scaredas:

brooklyn1550
04-09-2008, 06:15 PM
Mayweather TKO 10

Fab2333
04-09-2008, 06:16 PM
Here we go again, people are stil crying over this lost.
No it doesnt matter if Ramshall was the ref:yep, Hatton woulda still lost

dave82
04-09-2008, 06:16 PM
Nope. This thread is bogus!

tragicliston
04-09-2008, 06:18 PM
Oh good, another one of these threads. To answer your question: NO

CJLightweight
04-09-2008, 06:24 PM
he'd beat him at a beer drinking contest

MancMexican
04-09-2008, 06:25 PM
Seeing as he was dominating Floyd throughout the 10 rounds, and scoring lots of meaningful shots before the ref got involved and changed the course of the action I would say that he could have stopped Floyd in rounds 4-6

BlueApollo
04-09-2008, 06:26 PM
I wouldn't give Rick a 50/50 chance if the 3rd man was James Bond.

So to answer: No.

denilo
04-09-2008, 06:33 PM
who will win if the ref wasnt biased?

Yes, of course dear :nut1 :nut2 :nut3 :nut4 :nut5 :nut6 :nut7 :nut8:nut 9 :nut 10 - over and out.

Now go play on the highway:!: .

Trolling is fine by me. This unfortunately doesnt even qualify as trolling - What is the proper term for the level below?

Eubank
04-09-2008, 06:34 PM
We will never know. Hatton was cheated.

kartog
04-09-2008, 06:34 PM
Haha please don't even think of a PBF-Hatton II...
it's ridiculous!

Claypole
04-09-2008, 06:35 PM
Trolling is fine by me. This unfortunately doesnt even qualify as trolling - What is the proper term for the level below?Trailing.

Mikey
04-09-2008, 06:38 PM
Hatton is just too many classes below Mayweather, Hatton himself and his fans have to just accept it and dont waste anyones time with a rematch.

GOTTIcsc
04-09-2008, 06:39 PM
who will win if the ref wasnt biased?



Dont be ridiculus


Would Ricky Hatton have got KOed no matter who the ref was is the question and the answer is HELL YES :happy

Pimp C
04-09-2008, 06:40 PM
floyd wouldnt beat hatton at light welter as hatton would send a castillo lik body punch and he would be out 4 the count.
PBF would beat Hatton's ass worse at 140. He was faster and threw more combos at that weight.:deal

GOTTIcsc
04-09-2008, 06:40 PM
We will never know. Hatton was cheated.




LOL HE GOT KNOCKED THE FUCK OUT

GET OVER IT

Atritionist
04-09-2008, 06:45 PM
What kind of a question is that? first off, Hatton is nowhere at the level of floyd. floyd stood toe to toe ( which is uncharacteristic of him) and beat hatton at his own dirty fighting. secondly, Hatton was never in control of the fight and the only reason he was landing shots was because Floyd was not backing off like he usually does. Floyd took it to hatton and took him out in a beautiful TKO. NO MORE OF THIS HATTON HAD A CHANCE AGAINST FLOYD SHIT

rreed23
04-09-2008, 06:53 PM
I guess we will see in the rematch, there are definetely alot of Hatton haters on ESB, If you base your response on the matchup as opposed to your own biased opinion, the answer is possibly, who knows. The facts are that Ricky was not allowed to fight and Cortez had a huge impact on the overall outcome. However in the end he did get KO'd. I think he could beat Floyd at 147 in a real boxing match without all the bs breaking, most of those on ESB who say he can't really just don't want him to because then they don't like his style and want to keep hating. I'm guilty of this with regards to Cotto, I wan't to see him lose because I don't like his style.

Pimp C
04-09-2008, 06:55 PM
I guess we will see in the rematch, there are definetely alot of Hatton haters on ESB, If you base your response on the matchup as opposed to your own biased opinion, the answer is possibly, who knows. The facts are that Ricky was not allowed to fight and Cortez had a huge impact on the overall outcome. However in the end he did get KO'd. I think he could beat Floyd at 147 in a real boxing match without all the bs breaking, most of those on ESB who say he can't really just don't want him to because then they don't like his style and want to keep hating. I'm guilty of this with regards to Cotto, I wan't to see him lose because I don't like his style.
:patsch :-(

JohnPaul Futbol
04-09-2008, 06:56 PM
wtf?

Mikey
04-09-2008, 06:57 PM
I guess we will see in the rematch, there are definetely alot of Hatton haters on ESB, If you base your response on the matchup as opposed to your own biased opinion, the answer is possibly, who knows. The facts are that Ricky was not allowed to fight and Cortez had a huge impact on the overall outcome. However in the end he did get KO'd. I think he could beat Floyd at 147 in a real boxing match without all the bs breaking, most of those on ESB who say he can't really just don't want him to because then they don't like his style and want to keep hating. I'm guilty of this with regards to Cotto, I wan't to see him lose because I don't like his style.

Hatton has no chance, remember Mayweather was just as willing to hold and grapple himself which sometimes led Cortez to have no choice to break them up cause there was way too much grabbing and clinching for a boxing match, and when they were actually fighting on the inside Hatton was still getting destroyed.

Mayweather beat Hatton at his own game, and if Mayweather fights his own game next time it will be TKO 6.

PH|LLA
04-09-2008, 07:02 PM
No but the fight would've been closer.

Make it at 140 instead of 147 and the fight becomes even closer still, almost even odds.

MetroMan
04-09-2008, 07:03 PM
No. The referee was a bit quick to break them up at times, but Mayweather whooped Hatton's ass at the end of the day.

Rise Above
04-09-2008, 07:04 PM
Hatton nuthuggers are worse than Pac nuthuggers.

Atritionist
04-09-2008, 07:10 PM
No no no, Im not a Hatton hater, as a matter of fact i was rooting for the englishman. But I am a truthful person, and know Floyd is way superior than Hatton is in that ring. Bring the fight to 140, floyd will just outbox and outsmart hatton to an easy decision. basicly tag and play keep away

RafaelGonzal
04-09-2008, 07:20 PM
the real question is could Hatton would have got passed Tszyu with out the help of his Ref.

Brian123
04-09-2008, 07:54 PM
who will win if the ref wasnt biased?

You have come to the most pro- Mayrunner site on the web for my friend!

Sweet Science and Yahoo have had polls that had it at about 50/50 with 50,000+ votes so that appears to be your true answer.

Pimp C
04-09-2008, 07:58 PM
You have come to the most pro- Mayrunner site on the web for my friend!

Sweet Science and Yahoo have had polls that had it at about 50/50 with 50,000+ votes so that appears to be your true answer.
:patsch :-(

Lance_Uppercut
04-09-2008, 08:12 PM
who will win if the ref wasnt biased?

No. Hatton simply isn't on Mayweather's level.

jlrivera81
04-09-2008, 08:13 PM
floyd wouldnt beat hatton at light welter as hatton would send a castillo lik body punch and he would be out 4 the count.

Is this a joke? Please say it is!!! Hatton is perhaps the most, if not top 3, overated champions of the last 5 years or so.

Hatton was probably the least talented champion of any division. He has 1 defense, and a terrible offense that consist of lunging in with a hook, then holding. If he is not holding, he is simply smothering his punches. Any B class fighter or above makes hatton look below average in the ring.

hatton made his name KO"s english cab drivers and a washed up Kosta and Castillo. Besides them, he hasnt beaten anyone noticeable.

To to answer your question, Hatton stands no chance at all against Floyd at any weight with any ref.

elindiomonzon
04-09-2008, 08:20 PM
N O

Carlos Primera
04-09-2008, 08:26 PM
hatton would have gotten beat down even if his dad was the 3rd man.

TIGEREDGE
04-09-2008, 08:37 PM
the ricky hatton of 07 always gets beat by may. but back in 04/05, i am not so sure

sues2nd
04-09-2008, 08:38 PM
Is this thread serious???

BITCH ASS
04-09-2008, 08:41 PM
NO

Atritionist
04-09-2008, 08:42 PM
the real question is could Hatton would have got passed Tszyu with out the help of his Ref.

This is a way better question?

jlrivera81
04-09-2008, 08:46 PM
This is a way better question?

I concur!!

See Me Flow
04-09-2008, 08:48 PM
[Only registered and activated users can see links]
Enough Said!

Antwuan Maxx
04-09-2008, 08:49 PM
who will win if the ref wasnt biased?

[Only registered and activated users can see links]


Yeah, the biased ref had a whole lot to do with Hatton telegraphing and leaping with his hooks on multiple occasions. :lol:

dave82
04-09-2008, 08:58 PM
hatton didnt make any excuses so why the f@*k are you lot making them?
the guy got knocked out. Simple

PH|LLA
04-09-2008, 09:01 PM
the real question is could Hatton would have got passed Tszyu with out the help of his Ref.
the answer is no.

gatorage
04-09-2008, 09:29 PM
Not ever in a million years ...

RealIzm
04-09-2008, 09:45 PM
[Only registered and activated users can see links]


Yeah, the biased ref had a whole lot to do with Hatton telegraphing and leaping with his hooks on multiple occasions. :lol:Exactly....Cortez is a good ref and did'nt allow Ricky to wrestle....don't like it? watch fucking wrestling or old tapes of John Ruiz or even old Hatton fights.....fucking pathetic:-(

Toopretty
04-09-2008, 10:33 PM
If hatton got inside and fucking punched. The ref would not break shit up. Not one time did the ref break up anything while punches were being thrown. Hatton was trying to wrestle and floyd was wrestling his ass back. So neither are punching.. ITS AGAINST THE FUCKING RULES OF BOXING. NO HOLDING ...........NO HOLDING BY EITHER GUY> Floyd held and Hatton held...the ref is supposed to break that shit up. The ref did the same shit in the Castillo fight...LOL..but you dont want to cry about that b/c Hatton got in the left hook...

SweetScience
04-09-2008, 10:36 PM
floyd wouldnt beat hatton at light welter as hatton would send a castillo lik body punch and he would be out 4 the count.

:rofl :rofl

AlonzoGreene
04-11-2008, 03:53 AM
You have come to the most pro- Mayrunner site on the web for my friend!

Sweet Science and Yahoo have had polls that had it at about 50/50 with 50,000+ votes so that appears to be your true answer.

:patsch Your 33 years old...get a life.

Symphenyceo
04-11-2008, 04:16 AM
:patsch Your 33 years old...get a life.

:good

Betty Swollocks
04-11-2008, 04:20 AM
hatton didnt make any excuses so why the f@*k are you lot making them?
the guy got knocked out. Simple

didn't make any excuses?

so what about moaning continously about Cortez, about the weight issue, about how his fans didn;t help him by booing the American anthem.......are those not excuses?:patsch

saul_ir34
04-15-2008, 01:16 PM
No. The ref had nothing to do with him being completely outclassed and being nothing more than a clinching midget.

KO Boxing
04-15-2008, 01:17 PM
:lol:

Had to dig up this post in YOUR very first post.

Methinks someone was banned or got a new username.

Mrboogie23
04-15-2008, 01:17 PM
simple answer. No.

Bluenose
04-15-2008, 01:26 PM
Simply put no. I did think the referee was a bit of a joke and I was not overly impressed with his performance as I thought it had a negative effect on the fight but the fact is Floyd was a notch above and Ricky would have been beat no matter who was put in charge.

Hatton defence is all over the place and against someone like Floyd Mayweather I'm afraid that just simply is not good enough. Ricky's loss was purely down to his ability and thats coming from someone who has forked out 150 quid for a ticket to his next fight.

I like the guy but no excuses should be made.

walk with me
04-15-2008, 01:28 PM
no

196osh
04-15-2008, 02:32 PM
:lol: at this thread.

Nalian
04-15-2008, 02:36 PM
As much as I hate Hatton, the ref was the MAJOR factor in that fight and not Floyd. Worst referring performance ive ever seen, made even worse by the fact that i watched Cortez ref a fight the other day and he let pretty much everything go.

Also note, floyd was the one using elbows, floyd was the one clinching after throwing one punch, floyd was the one ducking below waist level. I remember at one point Floyd even initiated a clinch and Cortez told Hatton off!

I dont think even the most hardened Floyd fans would disagree that the ref really screwed Ricky.

That being said, Mayweather still cruises to a UD with a neutral ref mainly cuz he's levels above Hatton, and I mean LEVELS.