PDA

View Full Version : Better quality of opposition: Cotto or Margarito?


DaveTheWave
04-15-2008, 09:37 AM
Who has the better resume, and who has fought a higher level of opposition? The obvious answer is Cotto to me, am I nuts?

whit
04-15-2008, 09:38 AM
Cotto

thewoo
04-15-2008, 09:40 AM
I'd say Judah, Mosley and Quintana put Cotto over the top. Up until that point they were about even

Rumsfeld
04-15-2008, 09:43 AM
I'd say Judah, Mosley and Quintana put Cotto over the top. Up until that point they were about even

:nod

Asterion
04-15-2008, 09:58 AM
This question is ridiculous.

Cotto by far. Antonio Margarito's resume sucks: his best wins are over a guy that built his reputation beating Mark fuckin Suarez. :rofl

1lehudson
04-15-2008, 09:59 AM
Who has the better resume, and who has fought a higher level of opposition? The obvious answer is Cotto to me, am I nuts?Is this a serious question??? Margo fought Williams and lost, Santos and lost, and a bunch of scrubs.

Montero
04-15-2008, 10:02 AM
Cotto. But to say that Margarito's resume "sucks" is a pretty ignorant statement. Cotto started fighting as a pro when he was a teenager with no amateur experience - many of his early loses were "growing pains" that Cotto had the benefit of getting in the amatuers. So in several ways, Cotto's resume may be "better", but Margarito's has been "tougher" - as in a harder road to travel down...

Make sense?

Relentless
04-15-2008, 10:04 AM
Is this a serious question??? Margo fought Williams and lost, Santos and lost, and a bunch of scrubs.

but he would still kick you and your cock lovin' fathers ass on the same minute.

Asterion
04-15-2008, 10:05 AM
Cotto. But to say that Margarito's resume "sucks" is a pretty ignorant statement. Cotto started fighting as a pro when he was a teenager with no amateur experience - many of his early loses were "growing pains" that Cotto had the benefit of getting in the amatuers. So in several ways, Cotto's resume may be "better", but Margarito's has been "tougher" - as in a harder road to travel down...

Make sense?


I am saying that Margarito's resume sucks not because of his loses, but because his best wins: Kermit Cintron.

1lehudson
04-15-2008, 10:08 AM
but he would still kick you and your cock lovin' fathers ass on the same minute.I would bet not, they have weights for a reason. I could cut off both legs and still out weight Margo by 50 pounds, not to mention Im pretty nice with my hands:bbb

Relentless
04-15-2008, 10:14 AM
combined opponents records of cotto hatton and margo.

Cotto
747-155-18 (6 undefeated)

Hatton
940-383-65 (3 undefeated)

Margarito
828-208-24 (6 undefeated)

Relentless
04-15-2008, 10:15 AM
I would bet not, they have weights for a reason. I could cut off both legs and still out weight Margo by 50 pounds, not to mention Im pretty nice with my hands:bbb

you would outweigh me by 50 pounds too but i'd still molest you like you were my step son.

fitzgeraldz
04-15-2008, 10:50 AM
Cotto

Relentless
04-15-2008, 10:50 AM
Cotto

hows your ass?:hi:

Samurai
04-15-2008, 10:56 AM
Cotto, no question

Ambition_Def
04-15-2008, 11:10 AM
Cotto but don't play like Margo has had it easy. He's had one of the toughest roads as a pro.

Cotto on the other hand has been nurtured and it makes obvious sense that his record and resume of wins would be better.

Besides what difference does it make. If best wins and resumes meant something then Glen Johnson wouldn't have come close to controversy against Chad Dawson.

Scar
04-15-2008, 11:11 AM
Cotto.