PDA

View Full Version : Juan Lazcano V Timothy Bradley


Fat Joe
05-04-2008, 07:24 AM
Hatton's and Witter's next opponents.

There's a lot of banter in the Brit Forum about what kind of quality opponent they are.

No one seems to know much about Bradley in the Brit Forum.

I'm not familiar with either fighter. Do any of you American's have an opinion on who is the better fighter?

KCD
05-04-2008, 07:31 AM
Lazcarno on points in a decent scrap.

warrior85
05-04-2008, 07:33 AM
never seen bradley fight,never heard of him until he was matched up with castillo,so i cant say.

Antwuan Maxx
05-04-2008, 07:34 AM
Hatton's and Witter's next opponents.

There's a lot of banter in the Brit Forum about what kind of quality opponent they are.

No one seems to know much about Bradley in the Brit Forum.

I'm not familiar with either fighter. Do any of you American's have an opinion on who is the better fighter?

Lazcano is close to being a shot fighter. Not only did he lose to Vivian Harris, but his previous fight with Manuel Garnica should have been a loss to. While Bradley on the other hand, had no trouble what so ever with Garnica, and put him down twice. Prime for prime, Lazcano beats Bradley. Currently, Bradley UDs him.

Mikey
05-04-2008, 07:42 AM
Bradley by wide UD

PowerPuncher
05-04-2008, 08:32 AM
Lazcano is close to being a shot fighter. Not only did he lose to Vivian Harris, but his previous fight with Manuel Garnica should have been a loss to. While Bradley on the other hand, had no trouble what so ever with Garnica, and put him down twice. Prime for prime, Lazcano beats Bradley. Currently, Bradley UDs him.

Exactly in the 1 common opponent recently Bradley proved to be allot better

What do you make of Bradley?

onourway
05-04-2008, 09:01 AM
Exactly in the 1 common opponent recently Bradley proved to be allot better

What do you make of Bradley?

Wasn't Hatton better than Mayweather in terms of common opponents?

It means nothing.

Lazcano has achievements in boxing, has fought against big names and has proven himself as a good boxer.

Bradley has fought nobody and an unbeaten american with no hype must be pretty poor.

Mikey
05-04-2008, 09:07 AM
Lazcano 15 year career no world titles. A decade to get a title shot.

Takes Bradley 3 years to get a title shot and be rated number 1 in the world rankings.

PowerPuncher
05-04-2008, 09:17 AM
Wasn't Hatton better than Mayweather in terms of common opponents?

It means nothing.

Lazcano has achievements in boxing, has fought against big names and has proven himself as a good boxer.

Bradley has fought nobody and an unbeaten american with no hype must be pretty poor.

Bradley won every round against Garnica and dropped him. Garnica beat Lazcanno (got robbed) and beat Viscous Maussa.

Stop nutthugging Hatton, Lazcanno is done, coming off 2 defeats, hasnt fought in a year and is 33. Just take this fight for what it is, a gimme

Jack
05-04-2008, 10:21 AM
Lazcano 15 year career no world titles. A decade to get a title shot.

Takes Bradley 3 years to get a title shot and be rated number 1 in the world rankings.
It took Leon Spinks 1 year to become the undisputed heavyweight world champion.

Sonny Liston was a pro for 9 years before getting his shot.

Therefore, according to this logic, Spinks > Liston. Get the fuck out of here, with that stupid logic.

I picked Lazcano. Unlike Bradley he's beaten good opponents and has been ranked very highly. Bradley is a nothing fighter. I can't even imagnie how much shit would be kcked up if Hatton decided to fight Bradley instead of Lazcano.

Antwuan Maxx
05-04-2008, 10:37 AM
It took Leon Spinks 1 year to become the undisputed heavyweight world champion.

Sonny Liston was a pro for 9 years before getting his shot.

Therefore, according to this logic, Spinks > Liston. Get the fuck out of here, with that stupid logic.

I picked Lazcano. Unlike Bradley he's beaten good opponents and has been ranked very highly. Bradley is a nothing fighter. I can't even imagnie how much shit would be kcked up if Hatton decided to fight Bradley instead of Lazcano.

Have you even seen Lazcano's recent bouts? Particularly the Harris and Garnica fights? Doesn't sound like it. He looked like shit in both of those fights and clearly lost. He also had a war with Ben Tackie, in which he actually came close to putting Tackie away, but took just as much as he dished out. Those victories you refer to were how many years ago?

Mikey
05-04-2008, 10:51 PM
It took Leon Spinks 1 year to become the undisputed heavyweight world champion.

Sonny Liston was a pro for 9 years before getting his shot.

Therefore, according to this logic, Spinks > Liston. Get the fuck out of here, with that stupid logic.

I picked Lazcano. Unlike Bradley he's beaten good opponents and has been ranked very highly. Bradley is a nothing fighter. I can't even imagnie how much shit would be kcked up if Hatton decided to fight Bradley instead of Lazcano.#

You picked Lazcano cause your totally fucking deluded, get a clue. He carried his lightweight ranking, ranked nowhere by all sanctioning bodies bar the IBO. Plus my logic stands, how many world titles did Liston fight for? How many did Lazcano fight for?