D-MAC
06-20-2008, 07:20 PM
Is Joe's legacy in jeopardy, a bit anyway, now that he has declared that he wants to have one more fight, and that it be against Roy Jones Jr.
His four biggest wins are against:
(1) Chris Eubank
(2) Jeff Lacy
(3) Mikkel Kessler
(4) Bernard Hopkins
People could throw tags onto these wins (I don't by the way):
(1) Past his best
(2) A hyped-up-nobody (although Lacy has had bad injury problems which have hampered him in a return to good form)
(3) Unproven at top level
(4) Past his best
Roy Jones is obviously not the fighter he was; I think we can all agree with that. So will Joe have to rely upon what Kessler does in the rest of his career to decide if he will rise or fall in All-Time P4P stakes.
Of course I do realise that things can change, and that Joe may end up fighting Pavlik (a more live target), but as things stand at the moment (what with the comments 2nite) does Joe rely on Kessler to a large extent?
I'm not having a go at Joe's HOF credentials (he is in there), but does his stock fall (overall) in comparison with how Kessler fares?
His four biggest wins are against:
(1) Chris Eubank
(2) Jeff Lacy
(3) Mikkel Kessler
(4) Bernard Hopkins
People could throw tags onto these wins (I don't by the way):
(1) Past his best
(2) A hyped-up-nobody (although Lacy has had bad injury problems which have hampered him in a return to good form)
(3) Unproven at top level
(4) Past his best
Roy Jones is obviously not the fighter he was; I think we can all agree with that. So will Joe have to rely upon what Kessler does in the rest of his career to decide if he will rise or fall in All-Time P4P stakes.
Of course I do realise that things can change, and that Joe may end up fighting Pavlik (a more live target), but as things stand at the moment (what with the comments 2nite) does Joe rely on Kessler to a large extent?
I'm not having a go at Joe's HOF credentials (he is in there), but does his stock fall (overall) in comparison with how Kessler fares?