PDA

View Full Version : Why does everyone rate Hopkins higher P4P then Spinks


quintonjacksonfan
07-22-2007, 09:14 PM
Is it because of a longer reign? Spinks never lost at his best weight
Hopkins lost three times. Hopkins beat a 37 year old Tarver who was
15 pounds higher then Hopkins natural weight. Hopkins also beat a 35
year old Wright who weighed 10 pounds more then Hopkins 160
Spinks beat a 31 year Old Gerry Conney who was 63 pounds above Spinks natural weight and a 35 year old Larry Holmes who was 48 pounds more then Spinks natural weight. He also stopped Holmes
from tying the most important record in boxing history
I know people think Holmes was shot but he picked up some nice wins in the 90's

Thread Stealer
07-22-2007, 09:29 PM
Who's "everyone"?

Michael is generally regarded as an ATG, and I haven't seen all these people say "Hopkins is p4p greater than Spinks".

dmille
07-22-2007, 09:37 PM
I rate Spinks as the number one light heavyweight of all-time and I rate him in my all-time pound-for-pound top ten

My dinner with Conteh
07-23-2007, 02:02 AM
I rate Spinks ahead.