DINAMITA
07-17-2008, 08:06 PM
I think we should all give the Calzaghe stuff a break.
It should be as black and white as this for all of us on either side of the divide:
- if he takes on Pavlik and beats him, he may have been the real deal all along and just never bothered proving it til the last few years of his career, and he has a right to be regarded as one of the elite boxers (say top 10) of his generation
- if he ends his career by beating up an over-the-hill former superstar and doesn't take the Pavlik challenge, or fights Pavlik and gets beaten, then I am inclined to state that 3 fights (Lacey, Kessler, and the poor performance and narrow 'win' v Hopkins) do not make a great career and that he never attained that elite status.
Do we agree on this gentlemen???
It should be as black and white as this for all of us on either side of the divide:
- if he takes on Pavlik and beats him, he may have been the real deal all along and just never bothered proving it til the last few years of his career, and he has a right to be regarded as one of the elite boxers (say top 10) of his generation
- if he ends his career by beating up an over-the-hill former superstar and doesn't take the Pavlik challenge, or fights Pavlik and gets beaten, then I am inclined to state that 3 fights (Lacey, Kessler, and the poor performance and narrow 'win' v Hopkins) do not make a great career and that he never attained that elite status.
Do we agree on this gentlemen???