View Full Version : kevin mitchell vs rocky juarez who wins?
faisal
08-13-2008, 04:26 PM
dispite getting schooled twice by berrara,soto,raheem and marquez
at this point i'd say juarez beats him, kevin is a brawler not a boxer and i'm not too sure he has the type of power to trouble juarez,
faisal
08-13-2008, 04:28 PM
after arthur juarez is probrably the weakest fighter at 130
BIG WORM
08-13-2008, 04:52 PM
i think hed beat mitchell, mitchells got no defence.
Estrada nearly TKO'd mitchell
BIG WORM
08-13-2008, 04:53 PM
i think hed beat mitchell, mitchells got no defence.
Estrada nearly TKO'd mitchell
Claypole
08-13-2008, 05:12 PM
Estrada nearly TKO'd mitchellKevin's defence was leaky and he ate some leather, but to say he was nearly TKO'd is utter drivel.
BIG WORM
08-13-2008, 05:50 PM
Kevin's defence was leaky and he ate some leather, but to say he was nearly TKO'd is utter drivel.
he wasnt one punch away from being stopped but i couldnt see mitchell taking them combinations for another 7 rounds
he wasnt one punch away from being stopped but i couldnt see mitchell taking them combinations for another 7 rounds
Unfortunately we don't have your gift of forsight.
Fact is, he was never close to being stopped - and you don't know what you are talking about
As usual
Polymath
08-13-2008, 06:06 PM
dispite getting schooled twice by berrara,soto,raheem and marquez
at this point i'd say juarez beats him, kevin is a brawler not a boxer and i'm not too sure he has the type of power to trouble juarez,
Schooled by Barrera twice?! What?
Juarez won the first fight on most peoples cards, and barrera knew hed gotten a gift, why else would he rematch him?
D-MAC
08-13-2008, 09:48 PM
Juarez via murder.
Mitchell isn't ready for this kinda fight yet.....he might never be.
Dunky McCafferty
08-14-2008, 04:24 AM
after arthur juarez is probrably the weakest fighter at 130
What was the need for that comment?
Was this thread a cheap excuse to get a dig in at Alex Arthur?
Looks like it to me.
If you want to talk down Scotlands fighters, at least have the balls to do it openly Faisal...
I mean the thread is bullshit unless you analyze it for what it is... & that is that Mitchell is above Arthur already:lol:
Come back & talk to me when Alex finishes the cookie monster for good. In fact dont talk to me, grovel after this utterly disrespectful thread.
You on my hitlist now Faisal, & its all your own fault. Remember that.
BIG WORM
08-14-2008, 05:17 AM
Unfortunately we don't have your gift of forsight.
Fact is, he was never close to being stopped - and you don't know what you are talking about
As usual
shut up little muppet you probs aint ever been in a fight in your whole life man.
Whos WE. You make out like your a well respected man and that your opinion counts for everyone, when most people thought you was a twat.
your just a dumb little calzaghe nuthugger, you probably thought calzaghe schooled hopkins. Coz hes "the greatest supermidlleweight to ever live" aint he you little prat
you aint got a clue, and you aint even british so why you on here every two seconds protecting british fighters like you are best mates with em
dwilson
08-14-2008, 05:43 AM
Juaraez would stop Mitchell pretty easily unfortunetly.
faisal
08-14-2008, 09:35 AM
What was the need for that comment?
Was this thread a cheap excuse to get a dig in at Alex Arthur?
Looks like it to me.
If you want to talk down Scotlands fighters, at least have the balls to do it openly Faisal...
I mean the thread is bullshit unless you analyze it for what it is... & that is that Mitchell is above Arthur already:lol:
Come back & talk to me when Alex finishes the cookie monster for good. In fact dont talk to me, grovel after this utterly disrespectful thread.
You on my hitlist now Faisal, & its all your own fault. Remember that.
dunky dont be silly, i dont like to shyster any boxer, arthur hasnt done anything to justify being a force in the SF division (fighting nicky cook proves this point), however this doesnt change the fact that i rate limmond as a good inring tactician and paul appelby as a decent up and comming fighter, as for mitchell hes too mediocre i think arthur experience at fighting better quality opponents would show on the night.
Beeston Brawler
08-14-2008, 01:35 PM
I agree with Faisal for a change - FW seems to be keeping the WBO 130lb title for a little domestic tournament.
I like Alex Arthur - but he hasn't done anything to justify his standing as a world champion. If he unifies then fair enough, but until then, not for me.
Mitchell was ready to go against Johanneson - if Carl wouldn't have gassed I reckon the 0 was gone. Saw Carl in Leeds on Friday, I asked him when his next fight was but was too pissed to answer :rofl
Top guy actually, just stands in corner with a few mates and stares at the dodgy women that frequent Yates's :lol:
vBulletin® v3.8.0, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.