Jake La Motta v Marvin Hagler

[Napuis]

at 168 lbs, you decide

[Rattler]

Hagler UD

LaMotta isn't going to push Marvin around and bully him, or he'll get counter-dissected into a face sized band-aid.

[robert ungurean]

Hagler gives Jake a good going over.

[Napuis]

La Motta not getting much support here is he.

[salsanchezfan]

Why 168?

[Bummy Davis]

Lamotta is a lot tougher than given credit, in a trilogy Hagler MAY or May not get the best but Jake would be the toughest opponent that Hagler ever fought and I would bet Hagler would losse one at least of 3

[Napuis]

I meant 160 lbs.

[brooklyn1550]

Hagler UD

[la-califa]

Great brawl! Hagler couldn't Knock out LaMotta, But more importantly LaMotta couldn't knock out Hagler. So it would be Hagler's boxing ability which would be the difference. Hagler UD.

[laxpdx]

Hagler has all the ingredients. LaMotta had toughness second to none. Throw together these factors, and the result is........Hagler UD.

[mightyd40]

Hagler has all the ingredients. LaMotta had toughness second to none. Throw together these factors, and the result is........Hagler UD.
i feel the same way

[Ted Stickles]

Great brawl! Hagler couldn't Knock out LaMotta, But more importantly LaMotta couldn't knock out Hagler. So it would be Hagler's boxing ability which would be the difference. Hagler UD.


Agreed!!!